Catholic Nun Perfectly Explains the Hypocrisy of the "Pro-Life" Argument

a reply to: windword

So far I've only seen the hard side of the pro-choice view thrown around in here. It got me thinking, I know at least one in here is crazy about this "nonbinary gender' stuff. And here we seeing the symptoms of this (left right) Binary Mentality running amok. Typical partisan inability to meet in the middle; to compromise. Which got me thinking about the larger Big Deal made by these nonbinary people; and yet the far left is every bit as obtuse as their far right binary mentalist counterparts ever could be. Which would be yet more hypocrisy. But that discussion would be off topic.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Grambler

I am telling you that your belief that it should be legal for a mother to terminate a nine month term baby is wrong and disgusting, regardless of why you believe that.

I'm telling you that no one has the right to legislate a woman's body. Period!

It's no different then slavery. "I own you and your reproductive system".

Does the mother own the child's body?

The fetus is a growth inside a host.

Not a child until born and independent of host.

You're comparing a fetus to a growth.

It is a growth.

Not a comparison.

A cyst is a growth, a fetus isn't.

Parasite.

You prefer that?

You do. I prefer human being.

A human fetus is the parasite of a human being.

originally posted by: JD163
a reply to: Bluntone22

Of course, no sex, no pregnancy.....but you know how it goes,....people do have sex, and having sex is not the same as agreeing to carrying a fetus to term.

Well skydiving is not the same as agreeing to hit the ground at 200 miles and hour but it is known to happen.
There is an undeniable risk.

a reply to: Grambler

They are saying there should be NO LAWS for any reason to restrict a womans right to abortion.

It's a decision that should be up to her, her family and her doctor. The government shouldn't be involved. But, I'm willing to accept their intrusion as it stands now, for the sake of a civil society. Displace the rights from the woman to the fetus and you're going to have civil upheaval. That genie isn't going back in its bottle!

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Grambler

I am telling you that your belief that it should be legal for a mother to terminate a nine month term baby is wrong and disgusting, regardless of why you believe that.

I'm telling you that no one has the right to legislate a woman's body. Period!

It's no different then slavery. "I own you and your reproductive system".

Does the mother own the child's body?

The fetus is a growth inside a host.

Not a child until born and independent of host.

You're comparing a fetus to a growth.

It is a growth.

Not a comparison.

A cyst is a growth, a fetus isn't.

Parasite.

You prefer that?

You do. I prefer human being.

A human fetus is the parasite of a human being.

A parasite is of a different species to a host. That's not the case with a fetus.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: windword

So far I've only seen the hard side of the pro-choice view thrown around in here. It got me thinking, I know at least one in here is crazy about this "nonbinary gender' stuff. And here we seeing the symptoms of this (left right) Binary Mentality running amok. Typical partisan inability to meet in the middle; to compromise. Which got me thinking about the larger Big Deal made by these nonbinary people; and yet the far left is every bit as obtuse as their far right binary mentalist counterparts ever could be. Which would be yet more hypocrisy. But that discussion would be off topic.

What the hell does "non-binary" gender have to do with this?

Meet in the middle? Is that like government owns a woman from the waist down?

originally posted by: windword


You can find someone to kill your wife too. Doesn't make it legal. What's your point?

My point is Annee is saying there should be no law, and many others are agreeing!

You said no doctor would do it anyways, I showed you one that would. Gosnell is only stopped because it was illegal. Annee says it should not be illegal, thats what I am arguing against. Even you say the government should stay out of it, so you too think that if a woman and gosnell wanted to terminate a 9 month old baby, it should have been legal.


Lets take your wife killing argument.

This is the equivalent of saying we should remove laws that make it illegal for someone to kill you wife.

This is insane.

originally posted by: Annee

A human fetus is the parasite of a human being.

Ah. Now we're getting to the bottom of this 'lets choke the life out of newborn babies' mindset. Humans, the parasites.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Grambler

I am telling you that your belief that it should be legal for a mother to terminate a nine month term baby is wrong and disgusting, regardless of why you believe that.

I'm telling you that no one has the right to legislate a woman's body. Period!

It's no different then slavery. "I own you and your reproductive system".

Does the mother own the child's body?

The fetus is a growth inside a host.

Not a child until born and independent of host.

You're comparing a fetus to a growth.

It is a growth.

Not a comparison.

A cyst is a growth, a fetus isn't.

Parasite.

You prefer that?

You do. I prefer human being.

A human fetus is the parasite of a human being.

A parasite is of a different species to a host. That's not the case with a fetus.

I know the argument.

Claim is not a parasite because it benefits the species through procreation.

Not everyone agrees.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Grambler

I am telling you that your belief that it should be legal for a mother to terminate a nine month term baby is wrong and disgusting, regardless of why you believe that.

I'm telling you that no one has the right to legislate a woman's body. Period!

It's no different then slavery. "I own you and your reproductive system".

Does the mother own the child's body?

The fetus is a growth inside a host.

Not a child until born and independent of host.

You're comparing a fetus to a growth.

It is a growth.

Not a comparison.

A cyst is a growth, a fetus isn't.

Parasite.

You prefer that?

You do. I prefer human being.

A human fetus is the parasite of a human being.

A parasite is of a different species to a host. That's not the case with a fetus.

I know the argument.

Claim is not a parasite because it benefits the species through procreation.

Not everyone agrees.

Parasite is a technical term. You can use it correctly or not. Either way, your usage goes against biology.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: LesMisanthrope


Does she own her eggs?

Yes, but an egg is not a child.

Is a fertilized egg a child?

It will be.

Is an egg part of a woman's body? Is a fertilized egg still part of a woman's body? Or, did a chemical reaction somehow magically make that egg separate and not part of her body?

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: Annee

A human fetus is the parasite of a human being.

Ah. Now we're getting to the bottom of this 'lets choke the life out of newborn babies' mindset. Humans, the parasites.

NO, we're not. I am not the one who moved the goal posts.

RIGHT OF CHOICE.

No one has the right to own a woman's body and reproductive rights. Period.

a reply to: Annee

Nonbinary gender people go nuts with a left/right binary mindset is the situation I just realized during this course. That's all.

Until the government (whom all the liberals seem to LOVE the past 8 years btw) goes around impregnating chicks I dont see your comparison there holding much water.

How about you try to compare what goes down in an abortion clinic to the natural order of things. That would be a doozy!

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: LesMisanthrope


Does she own her eggs?

Yes, but an egg is not a child.

Is a fertilized egg a child?

It will be.

Is an egg part of a woman's body? Is a fertilized egg still part of a woman's body? Or, did a chemical reaction somehow magically make that egg separate and not part of her body?

Well the vagina is magic

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Grambler

I am telling you that your belief that it should be legal for a mother to terminate a nine month term baby is wrong and disgusting, regardless of why you believe that.

I'm telling you that no one has the right to legislate a woman's body. Period!

It's no different then slavery. "I own you and your reproductive system".

Does the mother own the child's body?

The fetus is a growth inside a host.

Not a child until born and independent of host.

You're comparing a fetus to a growth.

It is a growth.

Not a comparison.

A cyst is a growth, a fetus isn't.

Parasite.

You prefer that?

You do. I prefer human being.

A human fetus is the parasite of a human being.

Hahaha! Wow, the picture is becoming clearer.

Racist also call other races parasites.

As I pointed out earlier, this is the exact same argument used to commit genocide, and people on here are cheering it on.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Grambler

I am telling you that your belief that it should be legal for a mother to terminate a nine month term baby is wrong and disgusting, regardless of why you believe that.

I'm telling you that no one has the right to legislate a woman's body. Period!

It's no different then slavery. "I own you and your reproductive system".

Does the mother own the child's body?

The fetus is a growth inside a host.

Not a child until born and independent of host.

You're comparing a fetus to a growth.

It is a growth.

Not a comparison.

A cyst is a growth, a fetus isn't.

Parasite.

You prefer that?

You do. I prefer human being.

A human fetus is the parasite of a human being.

A parasite is of a different species to a host. That's not the case with a fetus.

I know the argument.

Claim is not a parasite because it benefits the species through procreation.

Not everyone agrees.

Parasite is a technical term. You can use it correctly or not. Either way, your usage goes against biology.

As I said, I know the argument.

I've read both sides from scientific points of view.

Some say a parasite is one who nourishes from the host body. That same species doesn't matter.

Scientists do not always agree. That's science.

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: LesMisanthrope


Does she own her eggs?

Yes, but an egg is not a child.

Is a fertilized egg a child?

It will be.

Is an egg part of a woman's body? Is a fertilized egg still part of a woman's body? Or, did a chemical reaction somehow magically make that egg separate and not part of her body?

Women are not born with fertilized eggs.

a reply to: Grambler

My point is Annee is saying there should be no law, and many others are agreeing!

Right. The government shouldn't interfere and come between a woman, her doctor and her family's choice when it comes to her body.

The government shouldn't have a say over anyone before they're born and within their constitutional jurisdiction. But Roe V Wade allows for states to interfere after viability.

this thread went off the deep end fast...

ninth month abortions??? lol....
it probably costs as much as it does just to induce labor early..
and it can be more dangerous...
and, if she wants to not be pregnant that badly, she could simply have them induce labor, or a c-section at that point.
so why would a women want one??

she's insane??
a severe defect has been found in the fetus..
or, it somehow is endangering her life and because of the nature of the problem, neither inducing labor or a c-section is a safe option.
or the doctor is the nut and has convinced her that this is her only option....

in two of those four options, yes, she should be allowed to abort...
the other two, someone should be sent to a psychiatrists...

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Grambler

I am telling you that your belief that it should be legal for a mother to terminate a nine month term baby is wrong and disgusting, regardless of why you believe that.

I'm telling you that no one has the right to legislate a woman's body. Period!

It's no different then slavery. "I own you and your reproductive system".

Does the mother own the child's body?

The fetus is a growth inside a host.

Not a child until born and independent of host.

You're comparing a fetus to a growth.

It is a growth.

Not a comparison.

A cyst is a growth, a fetus isn't.

Parasite.

You prefer that?

You do. I prefer human being.

A human fetus is the parasite of a human being.

A parasite is of a different species to a host. That's not the case with a fetus.

I know the argument.

Claim is not a parasite because it benefits the species through procreation.

Not everyone agrees.

Parasite is a technical term. You can use it correctly or not. Either way, your usage goes against biology.

As I said, I know the argument.

I've read both sides from scientific points of view.

Some say a parasite is one who nourishes from the host body. That same species doesn't matter.

Scientists do not always agree. That's science.

Both a growth and a parasite, both of which are false terms. It sounds like you're attempting to justify something with dubious language.