It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MrSensible
a reply to: TheBulk
I don't know. The article/reports didn't say. But if they were, shouldn't we be against them as well? And pretty much any kind of supremacy? Can we just make a blanket rule that if it a group can be defined as ______ Supremacy then we're against it?
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: TheBulk
Well, this isn't about brown supremacists, it's about the whites ones. So instead of deflecting, let's stick to the OP's topic. Wanna talk about the FBI's report on brown supremacy then make your own thread.
The guide, which details the process by which the FBI enters individuals on a terrorism watchlist, the Known or Suspected Terrorist File, notes that “domestic terrorism investigations focused on militia extremists, white supremacist extremists, and sovereign citizen extremists often have identified active links to law enforcement officers,” and explains in some detail how bureau policies have been crafted to take this infiltration into account.
originally posted by: Kali74
Kind of what people have been saying all along. The system needs to be cleansed from the bottom up... like an enema.
An enemy of the US government is not automatically my enemy
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: burdman30ott6
An enemy of the US government is not automatically my enemy
If they are an enemy of the US government, should they be in a position of power to enforce it's laws on the streets?
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
I also have to laugh and shake my head at anyone who doesn't see the manipulative nature of this. From the OP's article:
The guide, which details the process by which the FBI enters individuals on a terrorism watchlist, the Known or Suspected Terrorist File, notes that “domestic terrorism investigations focused on militia extremists, white supremacist extremists, and sovereign citizen extremists often have identified active links to law enforcement officers,” and explains in some detail how bureau policies have been crafted to take this infiltration into account.
Look at what they did there...
"militia extremists, white supremacist extremists, and sovereign citizen extremists"
They sandwiched the Neo-Nazi/Aryan idiots who are rightly feared and despised by citizens WHO THEY TRULY POSE A THREAT TO between two classifications of "extremists" who simply dislike, distrust, and philosophically threaten the federal government. WTF is that!?!? An enemy of the US government is not automatically my enemy... or should most of us be heading out to places like Berkley campus with our sidearms to start mowing down those folks making such a fuss over how much they hate the current government? It would seem they're a threat under this report...
Like white supremacist groups are rushing to be in law enforcement is pretty laughable..... sounds like liberal BS!
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: burdman30ott6
An enemy of the US government is not automatically my enemy
If they are an enemy of the US government, should they be in a position of power to enforce it's laws on the streets?
If they're local LEO, absolutely. To my knowledge, state and local police do not take any oath with respect to federal individuals or policies. An enemy of the US Constitution would be something else entirely, but the US government isn't the US Constitution in any way, shape, or form.
originally posted by: introvert
About as laughable as some moron strapping a bomb to himself and praising god before he kills himself and as many as he can around him.
Laughable, sad and yet it still happens.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: burdman30ott6
An enemy of the US government is not automatically my enemy
If they are an enemy of the US government, should they be in a position of power to enforce it's laws on the streets?
If they're local LEO, absolutely. To my knowledge, state and local police do not take any oath with respect to federal individuals or policies. An enemy of the US Constitution would be something else entirely, but the US government isn't the US Constitution in any way, shape, or form.
It depends on their oath?
So your ok with enemies of the government, including potential supremacists, patrolling the streets and expect their actions to be completely unbiased and just, and in compliance with all laws/regulations?
originally posted by: imitator
originally posted by: introvert
About as laughable as some moron strapping a bomb to himself and praising god before he kills himself and as many as he can around him.
Laughable, sad and yet it still happens.
yeah but... white supremacist groups rushing to be in law enforcement is probably a unrealistic lib fairy tale.
No, I'm not OK with supremacists in uniform, and you know damn well I didn't say that.
I am, however, fine with some of the folks the government has called their "enemies" in uniform serving their communities. These include sovereign citizens and militia members.