It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: HVTONE
Defund it. The people it serves arent worthy of my taxes. If you libturds want it pay for it yourself.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: HVTONE
You think it is cheaper for you for women to die from breast cancer. It is a slow process with many emergency room visits.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: misskat1
Wouldnt we be better off to give our tax dollars to clinics that not only offer the same services, but also provide medical health for the whole family?
Planned Parenthood specializes in "family planning",
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: misskat1
I had an argument with my nephew yesterday, regarding Planned Parenthood, and the critical roll they play in our society by providing health care to millions of American Women. He tells me that they dont use any Federal money to pay for abortions. The money they will loose if funding is cut off will cut off all the other services they provide, which will have a huge impact on womens health.
This is the pie chart he used to validate his argument.
Lets put Abortion off the table for a minute. And look at the other 97% of their services.
Their services are pretty much limited to paps, birth control and treating sexually transmitted diseases. But, all these services are provided at any Clinic or Drs office in America. Wouldnt we be better off to give our tax dollars to clinics that not only offer the same services, but also provide medical health for the whole family?
When I take Abortion off the table, it becomes clear (to me at least) that they are irrelevant to womens health. And actually the money they receive is draining a health care system that needs all the help it can get. Defunding Planned Parenthood isnt going to make Abortions illegal. And the services they provide, are already available.
His argument: Women are too shy or embarrassed to go to their own drs for stds and paps. In my book that just isnt a good enough reason to keep funding them.
Anyone else have an opinion on this??
I was listening to Hannity the other day and he was interviewing an anti-abortion woman who called like 100 planned parenthood facilities and only like 3 or 4 offered any kind of "women's health" beyond abortions and the ones that did offer other services actually just referred the patient out to other clinics. It was pretty clear that PP is just an abortion mill hiding under "women's health".
I'd be curious as to how that chart is developed. What is the underlying data?
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: HVTONE
the point is that mammograms is more a radiological service. many doctors and clinics in the US will refer their patients to a facility that specializes in those services. it kind of saves money, since this way not every danged doctor needs to buy the expensive equipment needed to provide these services! some doctors will even refer you to another place just for a simple x-ray.
originally posted by: HVTONE
a reply to: FredT
Thats not my problem.
Me and mine are more important than any and all of the above. Liberty and freedom necessitates both success and failure.
originally posted by: HVTONE
Less than 5 Planned Parenthoods perform mammograms, they only refer patients to licensed facilities. So in actuality, it would be cheaper by cutting out the middlemen.