It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Edumakated
An "an anti-abortion woman" called some clinics, and only three or four offered any other service than abortions.
Hmmm... I wonder, if she is an anti-abortion campaigner, can her results be trusted? I mean, clearly, to be described as such, she is not an unbiased source. How can we know that she did not deliberately call a huge number of locations which she KNEW provided only limited service, rather than calling a larger sample of locations, and getting a more realistic look at the service provision in the area?
originally posted by: Edumakated
I was listening to Hannity the other day and he was interviewing an anti-abortion woman who called like 100 planned parenthood facilities and only like 3 or 4 offered any kind of "women's health" beyond abortions and the ones that did offer other services actually just referred the patient out to other clinics. It was pretty clear that PP is just an abortion mill hiding under "women's health".
I'd be curious as to how that chart is developed. What is the underlying data?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Edumakated
I was listening to Hannity the other day and he was interviewing an anti-abortion woman who called like 100 planned parenthood facilities and only like 3 or 4 offered any kind of "women's health" beyond abortions and the ones that did offer other services actually just referred the patient out to other clinics. It was pretty clear that PP is just an abortion mill hiding under "women's health".
I'd be curious as to how that chart is developed. What is the underlying data?
If anything screams, "I like being told things I want to hear" its what you wrote above. Especially the bolded part.
originally posted by: drewlander
a reply to: neo96
Actually I think Planned Parenthood should exist. You'd be surprised how much less they offer care for than the hospital. Consider that as much as 20% of all pregnancies fail without an "abortion" as you might define. Most women dont want to wait for their body to expell an unborn fetus as a daily reminder of their failed pregnancy, so they generally choose to get a d&c, which is the same procedure as an abortion on paper. A d&c at the hospital costs about 10x more than at planned parenthood to remove the unborn carcass. Would you like to pay a hospital 10x more for the same procedure that planned parenthood does routinely?
Also not to side track, but whenever you hear or see a number for the amount of abortions in your state , city or nationwide, remember that information is voluntary. I personally believe the number is likely to be inflated by as much as 20% because of what I previously stated.
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
Got a source for that statistic?
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: windword
Women who use Planned Parenthood don't have family doctors or insurance.
that's isn't really true.. at least not all cases..
some people might have the insurance, but her doctor would charge her more than the planned parenthood so she will go to planned parenthood.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Edumakated
No it is not telling.
Its one hundred locations, and we only have her word for it that the numbers she dialed even connected to the actual PP locations. You could just as easily be looking at a vicious hoax, a propaganda creation here.
originally posted by: gladtobehere
a reply to: misskat1
Its insane that tax payers are forced to pay for abortions.
That is all.
Carry on.
what happens if/when they do away with the ACA and millions lose healthcare. where will they go for affordable family planning?
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: gladtobehere
a reply to: misskat1
Its insane that tax payers are forced to pay for abortions.
That is all.
Carry on.
prove that taxpayers pay for planned parenthood abortions.