How to silence an entire block of protestors

a reply to: Navieko

The guy is very compelling but that wasn't just some impromtu interview on the street. Let's not pretend it was.

Nice... Interesting how the leftist female starts trash talking him because he is on a bike.. May I quote Cindy Lauper.. "I see your true colors, shining through" lefties.

a reply to: TrueBrit

So does that mean if a female brings a "fetus" to term and the male doesn't want it he can kill it or absolve himself from it completely? If it's truly only a women's body then why do men owe alimony?

originally posted by: loam

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Cancerwarrior

He has not made a very good start.

Already taking rights away from women, first thing off the bat, first piece of paper he signed. Does not bode well in the least.

It's a woman's right to have the US Government financially support with US taxpayer dollars international family-planning organizations that provide abortions?

Wow. Your definition of a woman's right is pretty broad.

Utterly ridiculous.

With regard to the OP, excellent video. The left can continue to ignore, rather than try to understand, perspectives like his at their peril. How else does one explain the left's complete and continued routing from the halls of government from a party that only eight years ago everyone was saying was so decimated it would take decades before they recover?

I'm just quoting you because that's exactly what my reaction was.

It's the global community of women's right to have American dollars finance their....anything? Weird.

We hear day in and day out here on ATS how America needs to stay out of other countries and out of their business. But when the money dries up, suddenly we're taking away people's rights? Which is it, you want our money or don't you?

a reply to: kosmicjack

Also my reaction. Hard to swallow they just randomly picked this guy and let him run with the speech...

originally posted by: butcherguy
That woman was telling him that he was 'on a bike' , as if he didn't know that... and what is negative about using a bike for transportation there today? I thought the left wanted us all to ride bikes.

When a SJW goes full retard and is then confronted by a paradox (in this instance a black Trump supporter) they will link inanimate objects to degrading of social status, like she is living Facebook.

In other words, she couldn't call him a racist so her mind went into a feedback loop as she tried to be nasty to him another way.

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
Everyone needs to watch this - random black dude shuts down a herd of triggered SJWs with logic and an awareness of history as to why Trump won and how the liberals have been infiltrated and are hell bent on destroying America.

He totally pwned the lot of them, knowledge is power.

he's just a dude

a reply to: Navieko

Big Joe just leveled up to Great Joe.

Awesome.

When he started dropping Margaret Sanger bombs, I knew that man was woke.

The funds that Trump's executive order withdrew... People do know that such funds help rape victims in war-torn nations. Places where rape is used as a tool.

Would you birth a child to a soldier who raped you?

It isn't a jump considering the people Trump has used to fill positions that some time in the future, more restrictions upon abortion may occur within the USA.

I don't think Trump is stupid, I reckon if he's inclined to push religious rhetoric, he won't do it on day one... He'd test the waters no?

Let me sum it up in a way that almost misses the point and is off topic.

Getting shot in the USA bankrupts people - Care should be for all and affordable.

Abortion - Despite religious "reasoning" plenty of reasons exist for it, if I was uneducated enough to be pregnant at 14 I'd like the option.

Education - Well I was hypothetically pregnant at 14, it happens. Despite all the money thrown at education, something is failing. I ain't read much on Trump's "Trump" on that.

Same sex marriage - More religious BS, might as well have racially based bus services again. I see no reason two people of the same sex cannot have a civil partnership. Other than religious leanings and/or homophobia.

I'll stop now, probably enough there to trigger a few righties.

Fact is, this video was a loud mouth just shouting at people. Baiting? Yeah sure, I'd be doubtful he'd be able to ride a bike through a crowd of "angry" and "aggressive" protestors either. I'm nowhere near his size and have quite a few hours of experience on bicycles and I'd avoid riding a bike in crowds because frankly it isn't safe. A reflection of his stupidity or yours?

He shows his colours, if he wasn't a plant for the "lols" and baiting then I'd have to assume he reads too many right-wing fake news sights.

When are we allowed to blame Trump anyways?

When he's dead?

We can't keep pushing back the date.

What a great guy. If you fancy a beer Big Joe I'm buying.

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Cancerwarrior

Well, the executive order he signed has to do with preventing US aid from being used to provide ANY family planning to 27million women around the world, so one has to assume, in conjunction with the fact that he is also appointing pro-life judges, that the American female reproductive organ, will shortly become a place he has sway over as well. Not just grabbing this time, but ordering women to bring fetuses to term, every time, no matter whether they want to, whether they are ready to... enforcing sexual morality, and controlling/abusing women in the process. Trump all over.

You do realize that this was not Trumps executive order, right? He was reinstating an order that was also under Reagan & Bush. A bill that takes no rights from anyone. It just removes federal monies being used overseas by anyone that does fund abortion. The USA as a nation has the right to remove monies from anyone overseas.

TPTB are pushing very hard to make sure everyone sees Trump as a sexist & racist. I thought you were able to see through the propaganda but I guess not, what a shame.

a reply to: Navieko

Most likely a lot of those protesters are searching for jobs because of how bad the economy is.

That said, the "educated ones" listened while it seemed the uneducated ones chirped back.

Either way, I enjoyed his session of free speech. Non combative, respectful, and polite. It was a nice watch thank you OP

originally posted by: RAY1990
The funds that Trump's executive order withdrew... People do know that such funds help rape victims in war-torn nations. Places where rape is used as a tool.

Would you birth a child to a soldier who raped you?

It isn't a jump considering the people Trump has used to fill positions that some time in the future, more restrictions upon abortion may occur within the USA.

I don't think Trump is stupid, I reckon if he's inclined to push religious rhetoric, he won't do it on day one... He'd test the waters no?

Let me sum it up in a way that almost misses the point and is off topic.

Getting shot in the USA bankrupts people - Care should be for all and affordable.

Abortion - Despite religious "reasoning" plenty of reasons exist for it, if I was uneducated enough to be pregnant at 14 I'd like the option.

Education - Well I was hypothetically pregnant at 14, it happens. Despite all the money thrown at education, something is failing. I ain't read much on Trump's "Trump" on that.

Same sex marriage - More religious BS, might as well have racially based bus services again. I see no reason two people of the same sex cannot have a civil partnership. Other than religious leanings and/or homophobia.

I'll stop now, probably enough there to trigger a few righties.

Fact is, this video was a loud mouth just shouting at people. Baiting? Yeah sure, I'd be doubtful he'd be able to ride a bike through a crowd of "angry" and "aggressive" protestors either. I'm nowhere near his size and have quite a few hours of experience on bicycles and I'd avoid riding a bike in crowds because frankly it isn't safe. A reflection of his stupidity or yours?

He shows his colours, if he wasn't a plant for the "lols" and baiting then I'd have to assume he reads too many right-wing fake news sights.

When are we allowed to blame Trump anyways?

When he's dead?

We can't keep pushing back the date.

None of which answers why it's our responsibility to fund it.

If our government is going to discipline soldiers that kicked the crap out of pedophiles amidst the ranks of our "allies" in other countries then why should our government fund any sort of birth control in other countries?

We're told that that Afghan boy-love is "cultural" and we need to stay out of it. But staying out of abortion and birth control in countries with a legitimate rape culture is somehow us taking away rights from women?

WOW.
Big Joe for President.
That is one smart man who knows exactly what is going on. Those people gathered around might have wanted to not listen, but they did. Some of that will have got through to some of those people.

Absolutely awesome.

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Cancerwarrior

Well, the executive order he signed has to do with preventing US aid from being used to provide ANY family planning to 27million women around the world, so one has to assume, in conjunction with the fact that he is also appointing pro-life judges, that the American female reproductive organ, will shortly become a place he has sway over as well. Not just grabbing this time, but ordering women to bring fetuses to term, every time, no matter whether they want to, whether they are ready to... enforcing sexual morality, and controlling/abusing women in the process. Trump all over.

You don't really understand what you are talking about. To be fair, I didn't understand this particular issue until he signed that exec order, but at least I had the good sense to look into it before reacting. All Trump has done here is re-instate something that Reagan and Bush did before him and it makes perfect sense.
Why in the world should the US tax payer be funding overseas abortions and why should abortions be marketed as part of family planning?
At least do some thinking before charging off on a talking point.

a reply to: butcherguy

nd what is negative about using a bike for transportation there today? I thought the left wanted us all to ride bikes.

Queen wrote a song just for this day...



www.lyriczz.com...

"Bicycle Race"

Bicycle bicycle bicycle
I want to ride my bicycle bicycle bicycle
I want to ride my bicycle
I want to ride my bike
I want to ride my bicycle
I want to ride it where I like

a reply to: Martin75

I wanted to tell everyone how long I was reading yesterday before I found even one article that explained these details.

I'm paraphrasing but if you weren't aware this bill has vacillated between repeeled and enacted for the last four presidents. That's a very important detail that I for one can't understand why it's not in every article about this topic.

a reply to: Iamthatbish

I'm paraphrasing but if you weren't aware this bill has vacillated between repeeled and enacted for the last four presidents. That's a very important detail that I for one can't understand why it's not in every article about this topic.

I think the answer is very simple....push the divide.

If people think that Trump is the one that got this ball rolling then they will hate Trump and think he is a sexist racist pig. We can't show that this has been done in the past by other republicans and is just being reinstated.