Photos: the crowd at Donald Trump’s inauguration vs. Barack Obama’s

a reply to: veracity

...meanwhile roving bands of anti-trump idiots are damaging business, attacking the police and assaulting the public. But you fear the imaginary ticking trump time-bombs.

Lol.

So transparent.

originally posted by: face23785
Today they barely let Trump walk any of it.

What does that say?

Trump was not fit enough/too lazy to walk to far!

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: veracity

...meanwhile roving bands of anti-trump idiots are damaging business, attacking the police and assaulting the public. But you fear the imaginary ticking time-bombs.

Lol.

So transparent.

no, not imaginary...proof of roving bands of "anti-trump idiots"? Not so sure that is true, you guys do like to twist truths. Just as I do not trust Don, I also do not trust his trumpluvrs

Trump had EIGHT TIMES more stream viewers than Obama in 2009 and set a record for live stream views.

Inauguration Sets Record for Live Video Streaming of News Event on Akamai
finance.yahoo.com...

What does that say, Trump haters?

a reply to: veracity

Police injured, more than 200 arrested at Trump inauguration protests

Six police officers were injured and 217 protesters arrested after they smashed windows, damaged cars and threw rocks at police near Donald Trump's inauguration ceremony on Friday in Washington.

At least two DC police officers and one other person were taken to the hospital for undetermined injuries after run-ins with protesters...

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Indigo5

What does that tell us about our current POTUS?

It say he was extremely lucky that the DNC picked a turd named Hillary to run against him.

You worded that exactly right. The DNC picked her. The Dem voters weren't allowed to decide. GOP establishment didn't want Trump but were overridden by the people. That's how it's supposed to work. The DNC doesn't believe in Democracy, they rigged their primary.

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
What does that say, Trump haters?

It says that more people have internet and viable devices to watch streams on in 2017 than they did 8 years ago, techno-philistine.

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: face23785
Today they barely let Trump walk any of it.

What does that say?

Trump was not fit enough/too lazy to walk to far!

If you watched it it was clearly the security detail that decided when to put him back in.

Nice try though.

a reply to: neformore

Yeah, no one had a computer in 2009.

Valid point though. The internet, and YouTube wasn't as mainstream back then as it is now.

a reply to: Deny Arrogance

That streaming has come a long way in 8 years. Did Netflix even have Instant Watch then?

a reply to: Xcalibur254

No, It was still a DvD-to-home service.

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: face23785
Today they barely let Trump walk any of it.

What does that say?

Trump was not fit enough/too lazy to walk to far!

If you watched it it was clearly the security detail that decided when to put him back in.

Nice try though.

Im sure Trump could run marathons and is in great shape.

a reply to: face23785

Moreover, he's 70 and I'm amazed at the schedule he can maintain. I'm significantly younger and can't imagine holding up as well.

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: veracity

Police injured, more than 200 arrested at Trump inauguration protests

Six police officers were injured and 217 protesters arrested after they smashed windows, damaged cars and threw rocks at police near Donald Trump's inauguration ceremony on Friday in Washington.

At least two DC police officers and one other person were taken to the hospital for undetermined injuries after run-ins with protesters...

that happened earlier today, not still going on now. I do not condone that behavior, but also not too surprised considering what they were protesting. They are also NOT droning idiots, they are people who are protesting for their country.

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: Xcathdra
The photo comparison is just anther attempt by the left to argue the failed point Clinton won the popular vote (which she didnt).

Trump won the popular vote in every single state he won, as did Hillary. Trump won more states than Clinton, which is why he won the electoral college.

The photo of Trump's was conveniently taken as people were still coming to the event. You can clearly see in other photos when Trump was onstage that the big white squares in the distance were filled with much more people than the starting post comparison photo used to make this thread.

Hence the time disparity shown between the pictures. Media tried that trick before with one of Trumps rallies. The photo they showed was taken several hours before the event, as people were still arriving.

a reply to: veracity

What were they protesting? un-burned cars and intact store front windows?

a reply to: veracity

The day is not over. Moreover, the whole point is you're more motivated to post about what you fear *might* happen rather than what does happen.

Fear of the imaginary.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: veracity

What were they protesting? un-burned cars and intact store front windows?

Everything Trump and his candidate picks stand for.

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: veracity

The day is not over. Moreover, the whole point is you're more motivated to post about what you fear *might* happen rather than what does happen.

Fear of the imaginary.

au contraire

dbl post edit