It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: network dude
See?
You aren't interested in having an intelligent discussion about the merits of the information provided. You just draw your line in the sand and that's that.
And it wasn't a jab, it's a belief based in actual evidence that Trump has Russian ties he refuses to talk about. There's evidence to support that.
~Tenth
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: loam
If it is fake, then somebody within the agency(ies) did it out of principle to their cause.
To me though, wikileaks coming out in defence of Russia and Trump is very telling.
~Tenth
Yea, no chance at all they are concerned with the TRUTH, must be some backroom dealing. Oh yea, Trump is bad, Mkay.
Oh please, if you replace the word Trump with Hillary, you'd be foaming at the mouth to claim all of this was absolutely true.
You have to admit ND, that this is far too coincidental to be a complete fabrication. Trump just lied in the series of tweets he just posted, he claims to have no deals, nothing in Russia, which isn't true.
Doesn't matter, I don't believe the whole 'golden' showers thing or anything within that report - so I'm on your side in this case, but I don't think he's completely 100% innocent of wrongdoing where Russia is concerned.
~Tenth
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Grambler
But if you don't believe this report, how are you not deeply disturbed that the intelligence agencies took it seriously? How can you trust anything they say?
If you can not trust what they say, how will they be able to prosecute anyone?
Is reporting what's posted on click bait sites considered journalism now?
I didn't think it was the Intelligence Agencies' jobs to actually prosecute. I thought they only produced the evidence and then recommended whether or not to prosecute based on that assessment.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Me too.
Why is any respectable news outlet reporting unsubstantiated claims, especially since other reputable news outlets haven't been able to verify it for six months?
Is reporting what's posted on click bait sites considered journalism now?
=====
As to the OP, I thought the timeline on this indicated it could not have come from 4chan? Also, has anyone chased down an Evan McMullin angle on this? He was the NeverTrump wing's candidate of choice and he is former C.I.A.
originally posted by: WorShip
LMAO this is #ing hilarious. It's like a #ing reverse psy-op on the government, from the people to the power. I love it, how embarrassing!