Fort Lauderdale Airport Shooting Suspect Claims U.S. Intelligence Forced Him to Watch ISIS Videos

a reply to: mikegrouchy

Well its time to chip in as a schizophrenic I can tell you Psychiatrists have two principal concerns,1.are you a threat to yourself and others and 2.are you compliant in taking your medication in this case the answer is no in both cases the legal system as it has been argued for the last few pages did what the law suggested however the mental health system and probably veterans affairs dropped the ball if we are told is indeed true I just saw a facebook page of a Emir Mohammed Sikkim,who would seem to be the perps identical twin.

Yes, it was HAARP mind control. Him, the ONLY person out of how many people whom live up there, to have any reaction whatsoever.

What utter moron-level bulls#.

originally posted by: Bedlam

originally posted by: mikegrouchy

The family says that "something got to him".

Yes, we all got that. And from their point of view, he went into the service ok and came out nuts.

But in your early 20's, your head rewires a lot of connections. Trims out and discards things you didn't use as a kid. When that happens, sometimes it #s up. And a common wiring mistake produces paranoid schizophrenia. And the features of that are often illogical thought, and hallucinations.

Yeah. Either that, or he is telling the truth.

originally posted by: mikegrouchy
I find it interesting that the Navy Yard shooter claimed something similar.

James Tilly Matthews claimed something similar in like 1820. Only he blamed the 'AirLoom'. Fascinating study. He claimed that a governmental agency had a machine called the AirLoom that could control people's thoughts at a distance. He claimed he had been implanted with a magnet, which allowed teams of dwarves to read his thoughts and control his actions with bar magnets they carried. He claimed he was being gangstalked. Pretty much every facet of modern schizophrenic thought, he documented at some point. It's really amazing that there is this commonality of experience.

originally posted by: 3daysgone

Yeah. Either that, or he is telling the truth.

Oh, I suppose the CIA could have picked out an engineering battalion National Guard to inflict mind control on, or he could have developed schizophrenia, been given a general discharge for unsuitability, admittedly started having hallucinations and then shot up a pile of people while screaming he's not Jewish. Personally, I'm betting schizophrenia.

originally posted by: 3daysgone
The system let this guy down along with his victims, no matter how you look at it. Not only could it have been stopped, it should have been stopped, but wasn't.

Which part do you see having the right to lock the guy up for being schizophrenic?

originally posted by: Bedlam

James Tilly Matthews claimed something similar in like 1820. Only he blamed the 'AirLoom'. Fascinating study. He claimed that a governmental agency had a machine called the AirLoom that could control people's thoughts at a distance. He claimed he had been implanted with a magnet, which allowed teams of dwarves to read his thoughts and control his actions with bar magnets they carried. He claimed he was being gangstalked. Pretty much every facet of modern schizophrenic thought, he documented at some point. It's really amazing that there is this commonality of experience.

If we are bringing in supporting cases, here are a few more.



Human Microchip Implants , Electronic Torture, & Mind Control
educate-yourself.org...

Hearing “Voices” The Hidden History of the CIA’s Electromagnetic Mind-Control Experiments
sites.google.com...



Voice of God: from the movie "Real Genius" (1985)
www.youtube.com...

a reply to: 3daysgone

Yeah. Either that, or he is telling the truth.

Christ-on-a-crutch.

No.

After all of that?

You're my friend now.

I can't let an friend continue on in such ignorance.

Esteban? Steve?

He was sick.

His family didn't know what to do.

You want an end to this?

It's education,

You just had some.

Yet you persist.

Which is admirable.

But WTF?!!!

originally posted by: mikegrouchy


If we are bringing in supporting cases, here are a few more.

Ah. "Educate-yourself". One of the greats.

originally posted by: Bedlam

originally posted by: 3daysgone
The system let this guy down along with his victims, no matter how you look at it. Not only could it have been stopped, it should have been stopped, but wasn't.

Which part do you see having the right to lock the guy up for being schizophrenic?

The part were he murdered people. The part that came to past because his government let him down.

Couldn't the fbi have escorted the guy to the local state hospital for a 72 hr hold for psych evaluation. That's legal and the right thing to do. After the guy, if schizophrenic, has been medicated and leveled out then the fbi follow up when he's cleared for release.

I understand the fbis not equipped to handle things like that but a ride or a call in to the state hospital isn't hard.

"hey Joe, this guy's nuts, talking about Isis and mind control stuff, what do we do? " " call the state Hospital to pick him up for a 72 hr psych evaluation and follow up to see if he just was schizophrenic "

originally posted by: Dan00
a reply to: 3daysgone

Yeah. Either that, or he is telling the truth.

Christ-on-a-crutch.

No.

After all of that?

You're my friend now.

I can't let an friend continue on in such ignorance.

Esteban? Steve?

He was sick.

His family didn't know what to do.

You want an end to this?

It's education,

You just had some.

Yet you persist.

Which is admirable.

But WTF?!!!

lol. I have to be skeptical for the same reason you are complacent. I am still your friend though.

originally posted by: PlasticWizard
Couldn't the fbi have escorted the guy to the local state hospital for a 72 hr hold for psych evaluation. That's legal and the right thing to do. After the guy, if schizophrenic, has been medicated and leveled out then the fbi follow up when he's cleared for release.

I understand the fbis not equipped to handle things like that but a ride or a call in to the state hospital isn't hard.

"hey Joe, this guy's nuts, talking about Isis and mind control stuff, what do we do? " " call the state Hospital to pick him up for a 72 hr psych evaluation and follow up to see if he just was schizophrenic "

If we take the suspect at his word it is the C.I.A.'s fault.

What can the F.B.I. actually do to the C.I.A. ?

a reply to: 3daysgone

You're awesome.

have a good weekend.

originally posted by: 3daysgone
The part were he murdered people. The part that came to past because his government let him down.

You're doing the time travel thing again. Without looking into the future, at which point could you have known 'this guy will murder five people in January'? You can't go around arresting someone for future events you don't know will come to pass.

The government didn't "let him down", either. There's no law that says you can forcibly treat the mentally ill and isolate or imprison them. Unless they meet really specific criteria, which he didn't.

originally posted by: PlasticWizard
Couldn't the fbi have escorted the guy to the local state hospital for a 72 hr hold for psych evaluation. That's legal...

And again, it's not. They can't hold, arrest, escort, force, coerce, sit on him, beat him, cuff him or detain him for thinking the CIA is using mind control on him and showing him ISIS videos. Any more than I can. It's not legal. They don't have the authority or jurisdiction to do so.

originally posted by: mikegrouchy

originally posted by: PlasticWizard
Couldn't the fbi have escorted the guy to the local state hospital for a 72 hr hold for psych evaluation. That's legal and the right thing to do. After the guy, if schizophrenic, has been medicated and leveled out then the fbi follow up when he's cleared for release.

I understand the fbis not equipped to handle things like that but a ride or a call in to the state hospital isn't hard.

"hey Joe, this guy's nuts, talking about Isis and mind control stuff, what do we do? " " call the state Hospital to pick him up for a 72 hr psych evaluation and follow up to see if he just was schizophrenic "

If we take the suspect at his word it is the C.I.A.'s fault.

What can the F.B.I. actually do to the C.I.A. ?

The suspect shouldn't be taken for his word until after a proper psych evaluation. If the suspect is actually cia, he's not making it out of the psych eval.

originally posted by: Bedlam

originally posted by: 3daysgone
The part were he murdered people. The part that came to past because his government let him down.

You're doing the time travel thing again. Without looking into the future, at which point could you have known 'this guy will murder five people in January'? You can't go around arresting someone for future events you don't know will come to pass.

The government didn't "let him down", either. There's no law that says you can forcibly treat the mentally ill and isolate or imprison them. Unless they meet really specific criteria, which he didn't.

Just what would that criteria be? Hallucinating ISIS maybe, on top of anger issues? Which I think we can all agree would be a very bad thing.

a reply to: Bedlam

What about using false aliases such as Emir Mohamed Sikkim on Jihadi forums since 2007,would that qualify as being a danger? just saw the facebook page of Esteban Santago's genetic twin-you can go on all you want denying mind control but theres a bad stink floating over this one

a reply to: Bedlam

They can call local law enforcement to handle the dirty work. They come out and if he seems like he's at danger, they will call an ambulance and take his ass to the state hospital for 72 hrs to get everything straightened out.

Literally happened out front of my house(roommate went schizophrenic)