It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Quaria
a reply to: supermilkman
Although I do agree with some of the points, too many of the points to list sound more like a world from one of those futuristic horror movies. I'd rather off myself than live in this kind of world.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
to do half that stuff would require us reimagining what civilzation is, and how it functions.
i think most would be impossible, just due to human nature. While humans are prone to irrational behavior, it is wholly rational that unmotivated people are unrewarded in life, and are unproductive in general.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: supermilkman
Many of these ideas have been in the minds of social scientists for over half a century. Back then people called them liberals and most of these ideas were squashed.
I 63 or 5, I read about a think tank. Back then , the about the only think tanks were organized by scientists mostly. Social and technological etc. They put out a paper on what the thought the world would look like by 2000. They gave a spectrum of possible futures 2000 ranging from utopian to fascist and corporate dictatorship. On a graph, the year 2000 was on the top, and the present day, the mid sixties, was on the bottom.
In between the present and the future were a whole range of changes and things that would need to be done to reach any of the possible futures described on the graph. The things that needed to be done were not simple and the ones that would be needed to reach a utopia were dramatic much like many of the suggestion brought out in your OP
If one wanted a future of fascism, all we needed to do was nothing, just let things go on the way they were, economically ecologically socially etc. Guess which way things have gone.
600 Celsius isn't quite enough to eliminate transmission, but 1000 Celsius should do it. Obviously this means any ordinary cooking temperatures are insufficient.
originally posted by: supermilkman
Your every day meat eaters that will probably not stop eating meat yet are potentially spreading BSE pathogens is another (which by the way needs temperatures as high as 600-700 celsius to eliminate.)
So 5 out of 35 hamsters experienced transmission after 600 Celsius, none after 1000 Celsius.
Exposure to 600°C completely ashed the brain samples, which, when reconstituted with saline to their original weights, transmitted disease to 5 of 35 inoculated hamsters. No transmissions occurred after exposure to 1,000°C.
The video doesn't say free energy, it says something about improved efficiency. While it may have practical applications eventually, what they've done doesn't seem remarkable to me and I certainly wouldn't call it free energy.
originally posted by: supermilkman
a reply to: TerryMcGuire
Here's a video about Maxwell's demon. It might be a link to free energy.
m.youtube.com...
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
600 Celsius isn't quite enough to eliminate transmission, but 1000 Celsius should do it. Obviously this means any ordinary cooking temperatures are insufficient.
originally posted by: supermilkman
Your every day meat eaters that will probably not stop eating meat yet are potentially spreading BSE pathogens is another (which by the way needs temperatures as high as 600-700 celsius to eliminate.)
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
So 5 out of 35 hamsters experienced transmission after 600 Celsius, none after 1000 Celsius.
Exposure to 600°C completely ashed the brain samples, which, when reconstituted with saline to their original weights, transmitted disease to 5 of 35 inoculated hamsters. No transmissions occurred after exposure to 1,000°C.
The video doesn't say free energy, it says something about improved efficiency. While it may have practical applications eventually, what they've done doesn't seem remarkable to me and I certainly wouldn't call it free energy.
originally posted by: supermilkman
a reply to: TerryMcGuire
Here's a video about Maxwell's demon. It might be a link to free energy.
m.youtube.com...
originally posted by: Denoli
That's great but what about religion swaying its ugly head or heads ?
That would screw the lot up for everyone 👍
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: supermilkman
Food is art. Automating restaurants just won't happen, unless you are simply wanting sandwiches and whatnot.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: supermilkman
yeah, you could totally automate stuff like McDonalds. And probably do better, as the computer is disinterested and with a bad attitude. So despite the impersonal nature of it, the experience would likely be better for the consumer.
But i employ actual chef's that make cuisine. And we are a loong way from having that type of thing automated. Although there are a million ways to improve on the system.
We've tried out systems like "plateIQ" to convert invoicing directly into AP entries. Saves on invoice coding and entry, which is maybe 10 hours of my week. Maybe a little less, depending. We are probably less than 10 years from removing the need for accounting folks. HR has already been almost totally automated, with my HR functions being solely decision making now. Records, requests, all that administrative stuff has been automated through Paycom (or any other number of HRIS providers)