It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tovenar
Mexico as a soverin nation has a duty to see that other countries treat its citizens with respect when they are abroad.
Basically what we are talking about here is basic human services. The measure is basically just a thinly vailed form of racism.
Arizona is also the state that doesn't respect Martin Luther King Day, and won't let it's employees have the day off.
Originally posted by tovenar
Mexico as a soverin nation has a duty to see that other countries treat its citizens with respect when they are abroad.
Basically what we are talking about here is basic human services. The measure is basically just a thinly vailed form of racism.
Originally posted by tovenar
we demand that international law be enforced in other countries (like iraq) but don't want it in our own boarders.
Originally posted by Kidfinger
This superb example of the Mexican mentality . . . . What a bunch of smucks!
I by no way mean any disrespect to people of spanish decent.
[edit on 1/28/05 by Kidfinger]
Originally posted by shots
What gives a Mexican official the right to challenge a law that was passed in Arizona?
The proposition passed by 60% majority vote. Forty percent of the 60% were legal Mexican immigrants, yet we have this bozo wanting to get the law declared unconstitutional by International courts, no less.
This brings up my next question; what would give an international court the right to decide which laws the U.S. or its states can or cannot make?