It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

why the NWO cant take over

page: 2
0
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:
Ric

posted on Jan, 30 2005 @ 08:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by faddinglight
If only a country could be formed that didn't use money, that was independent from the rest of the world, and focused on reducing the amount of work needed to be done in society, it could be done with the help of robotics..


It could be achieved if the NWO take over, of course there will always be the elite ruling class.



posted on Jan, 30 2005 @ 09:11 PM
link   
Lets say for a moment that the NWO does exist. I don't see how they would suffer any depletion of munitions and such if they operated using a puppet system of government for every region. Boundaries would still exist and force management would be centralized to each region. I havn't put alot of thought into that so feel free to tear it apart.



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 07:10 AM
link   
Read what I said again, then you'll understand.

Its not about forced one-world-government. Its about convincing people so that they don't know any better - its the only solution to some sort of global problem.

Look at what Bush convinced the World about Iraq. People may disagree, but do you see any violent protests against that? Exactly.



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 08:35 AM
link   
how could they control it though? The arab countries mainly control oil as it is but a swift military strike from nonOPEC nations could easily break the monopoly. The main resource for the future is not oil though; it is water. Jack Welch, former GE CEO, is investing heavily in the water industry. The way of the future is H2O fuel and the world in many places need water such as the Sahara and the northern deserts of China. Why not try to control the water purification industry as a means to take over the world? "Water water everywhere but controled is the type to drink."



posted on Jan, 31 2005 @ 08:57 AM
link   
GLOBAL & AN IMMINENT ATTACK ON AMERICA

This is real, scarey, and deserves serious consideration / discussion. Let the reader beware; this information is freaking people out.

Three websites (and more) are linked together which creates a frightening scenario.

www.rtkl-foundation.org...
inverseoption.safeshopper.com...
thesentinel.injesus.com...

What do you make of this?




posted on Feb, 1 2005 @ 09:43 PM
link   
First of all why would a serious terrorist organisation draw up plans that look like a 4 year old made them? Let's use some common sense. These people are not rocket scientists but they are out of kindergarten.


Ric

posted on Feb, 4 2005 @ 06:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by faddinglight
If only a country could be formed that didn't use money, that was independent from the rest of the world, and focused on reducing the amount of work needed to be done in society, it could be done with the help of robotics..


I think to work as a nation we need money, but if the country were made of small farming communities like the amnish then maybe it could work. But when you use more technology, societies become more complex, and with humans you need money to make it work.



posted on Feb, 6 2005 @ 12:30 AM
link   
It wouldn't work. Socialism, communism, anarchy like states never work in large masses. They require small areas which is funny....small groups large government....spooky
the only real case of socialism that i have heard actually working well was some community in Scotland....it was an anarcho-syndocist commune where they took turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. all the decisions of that officer had to ratified at a special biweekly meeting.



posted on Feb, 6 2005 @ 04:09 AM
link   
the nwo is the same sorta thing as the UN but they are a secret group of countries



posted on Feb, 7 2005 @ 12:12 AM
link   
well either that is the most "obvious" conversation killer post ever, or you are making a charge that the un is a public version of the nwo. What are you saying?



posted on Feb, 7 2005 @ 12:34 AM
link   


Its not about forced one-world-government. Its about convincing people so that they don't know any better - its the only solution to some sort of global problem.


Excellent point, thats the way I see it.




Since the NWO doesn't exist its an entirely hypothetical situation.


I'm curious as to why you think the NWO doesn't exist in one form
or another.
Just Curious, not being sarcastic or anything



posted on Feb, 7 2005 @ 12:40 AM
link   
.......Why even bother with oil.........Wouldn't it be more logical to just create hydrogen powered vehicles?


Thats IF even the NWO exists which I highly doubt it does.



posted on Feb, 7 2005 @ 06:34 AM
link   
has anyone else seen the reports of former GE ceo Jack Welch advising GE to take over water purification companies? Water will soon be the new oil and one company taking over the market is one sure fire way to start a pseudo-NWO,



posted on Feb, 7 2005 @ 09:52 AM
link   
geez some of yall are real idiots. the new world order is one in which all countries of the world are aligned and under the influence of lucifer. If anyone doesn't know it it is our very own gw bush (the antichrist) who is paving the way. We can't stop it, as it has been ordained. The end of time is almost here. Do not be afraid unless your on the wrong side as most people are. The end of time is merely the beginning of forever. How many of you know the flag is a false idol?

Though thou exalt thyself as the eagle, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith the LORD.
Obadiah 1:4



posted on Feb, 7 2005 @ 10:45 AM
link   
The nwo has nothing to do with religion. Some may say that the eccumenical movements of Christianity are the NWO. Satan i feel has better things to do than to make one united government across the earth. Also, the prophecy of the end times has been predicted since the death of christ. What makes you think that the time is now?
Weather? Political situations? The only reason we even pay attention to these things is that we are able to seem them now. Before this century we could not notice earthquakes or weather or global warming or know of political movements until way after they occured. The information age has made man more paranoid and fearful than when man was superstitious.


Also why the scripture? it has nothing to do with what you are talking about. It in no way makes reference to the existance of an NWO or the involvement of the unholy. All that quotation does is show that you can read the bible and regurgitate whatever the scripture of the week is.

[edit on 7-2-2005 by CAConrad0825]



posted on Feb, 7 2005 @ 11:59 AM
link   
wow! the ignorance of your statement floors me. You can be shown the signs high and low and people would still not believe. How can you say the new world order has nothing to do with religion. It has everything to do with religion. The new world order is the goal of the illuminati based on luciferian principles.

Somehow i don't think that you believe that lucifer exists.

Believe me he is very real.

And you ask how i know that we are at the end of time?

Let's just say for now that it has been revealed to me.

How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.

Re 18:8
Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.

Re 18:9
And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived deliciously with her, shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning,



posted on Feb, 7 2005 @ 03:08 PM
link   


How can you say the new world order has nothing to do with religion. It has everything to do with religion. The new world order is the goal of the illuminati based on luciferian principles.


My ignorance? l
what about spelling? Also you are going off on tangents. The illuminati is not the topic of discussion. Also, you need more proof than just stating its name to prove that such a group exists or even is behind the end of religion. All because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean that they are ignorant.

Also i do deny the existance of Satan or Lucifer or the Anti-Christ or any of such. I believe that he does not exist at least in this world. Satan is embodied in human nature and the will to control others so that man does not have to better upon himself and take the harder road of life. That is ignorance! Stating that someone is unfaithful or shall be condemned is against the law of God. These scare tactics that you subscribe to will be the tools of the NWO. Also, if you want to point fingers: one religious president of the USA, George Bush Sr. coined the term NWO. Is he a tool of satan? He brought this theory to light.

Why does the NWO have to be about bad religion? Some may say that the modern christian ecumenical movements, like nondenominationalism, is the NWO. Something for us all to think about: Christian, Jew, Gentile, or no religion at all, the key is to participate and listen to what is being said and to not ignore the suspicious messages. There is no one wrong group or right group. The people corrupt the system not vice-versa. Just look at Eden and also the world after the flood.



posted on Feb, 7 2005 @ 04:01 PM
link   
First, im not sure what was misspelled. Could you point that out? Second how can you deny that lucifer doesn't exist in this world. Do you think all of the evil that occurs is due to GOD. No, you are mistaken. This is quite literally lucifers realm. This life is just an illusion to the real one on the other side. I can't expect you to have faith. Just don't do evil to anyone. In time, you will believe.



posted on Feb, 7 2005 @ 07:05 PM
link   
I believe, just not the same way that you believe. God does commit acts that people claim are evil. How many times was Jerusalem sacked? That was all by God's command. He also according to your arguments, is evil by condemning those who do not believe. I appreciate you voicing your beliefs but to say that one is not saved because of your observation is wrong. That is up to god to decide. Jesus came to save the sick not the healthy, so let him be the doctor. I admire you for your reverence for the Lord but the path you are traveling down will turn more people away from God than torwards him. People of this world judge by appearance not by content. A good thing to remember during the lifelong mission that is our time on the world. Some are born into grace while others take till their last days to find it. I am still on my spiritual journey and will never be completed. God is so vast and mysterious that no man can ever fully understand him. As stated in John's Gospel:


There are also many things that Jesus did, but if these weret o be described individually, I do not think the whole world would contain the books that would be written.
John 21:25
God is beyond human comprehension. I do not feel that any theologian whether annointed or not can ever fully know what he is capable of because it is infinite.

[edit on 7-2-2005 by CAConrad0825]



posted on Feb, 7 2005 @ 07:40 PM
link   
believe me i was exactly like you were. i didn't believe anything because my father would force it down my throat when he was drunk. i will tell u what opened my eyes was the shroom.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join