It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
UN Security Council passes resolution urging end to Israeli settlements, after US refuses to use veto.
The motion was passed with 14 votes in favour and one abstention.
The Egyptian-drafted resolution had been withdrawn after Israel asked Donald Trump to intervene but it was proposed again by Malaysia, New Zealand, Senegal and Venezuela.
The US has traditionally sheltered Israel from condemnatory resolutions.
The issue of Jewish settlements is one of the most contentious between Israel and the Palestinians, who see them as an obstacle to peace.
About 500,000 Jews live in about 140 settlements built since Israel's 1967 occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The settlements are considered illegal under international law, though Israel disputes this.
after US refuses to use veto.
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
a reply to: Cobaltic1978
Obama hates Jews Israelis and Netanyahu especially.
originally posted by: Kharron
Ooooh another one, can't wait to see what happens with this one.
Wonder what the wording was; maybe they "strongly urge them to comply," or maybe they're "really, really asking them to stop."
It's a charade, no one is gonna go against money.
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
a reply to: Cobaltic1978
Obama hates Jews Israelis and Netanyahu especially. The settlements today add up to a tiny percentage of what Mizrahi and Sephardic Israelis got stolen from them in land and wealth by the Arabs
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
Good.
The Terror State of Israel is on borrowed time anyways.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Cobaltic1978
after US refuses to use veto.
Better late than never Barack.
It's way past time the UN did more than urge an end to and took steps against Israel for its flagrant flouting of UN Resolutions.
Israel can't be exempt from international law.
originally posted by: loveguy
I'm just curious, was it a british mandate that afforded a zionist policy in that region?
Or was that the birth of a zionist policy?
I'll thumb-wrestle myself while I think about it...
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Cobaltic1978
after US refuses to use veto.
Better late than never Barack.
It's way past time the UN did more than urge an end to and took steps against Israel for its flagrant flouting of UN Resolutions.
Israel can't be exempt from international law.