Clinton Donors Want to Investigate How Hillary Spent $1.5 Billion in Campaign Donations

I posted this awhile back but seams fitting for this thread.

a reply to: xuenchen

How drunk do you think she is right now?

Ive been saying it since before she lost. She better find a way to pay up since she cant produce what she sold.

You have to have a plan B. Even God has a plan B.

Bye mafia family that operated through government.

Take all your friends with you.

originally posted by: VinylTyrant
$1.5 BILLION!!!!!!

For a campaign?????

Donations?????

Is it just me or is that a staggering amount of money????
I'm sure plenty people would like to know how you lose when you have $1,500,000,000 to buy the American publics vote along with the entire media empire of the WORLD in your corner?
That was the most EPIC loss in the modern history of anything, take your pick. No wonder why you libs can't stop soaking your bib in tears, the feeling of defeat has been kept from you for far too long. Uncle Donnie will show you how to spend that kind of change wisely.

Unfortunately for the donors, all those promises you bought and got nothing for,
I can't stop laughing at.

As someone asked before, "what kind of moron loses $1.5 bil in a year?"

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: xuenchen

They are demanding an honest investigation of how Clinton failed to read the mood in swing states and how her Brooklyn operation misread polling data.

I can answer that.

They failed to factor in that people are tired of having candidates forced on them.

Someone gets it. Ya, something is broken here.

Denny

originally posted by: DaCook

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: xuenchen

They are demanding an honest investigation of how Clinton failed to read the mood in swing states and how her Brooklyn operation misread polling data.

I can answer that.

They failed to factor in that people are tired of having candidates forced on them.

Someone gets it. Ya, something is broken here.

Denny

I got a feeling more than just "something" will get broken.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: DaCook

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: xuenchen

They are demanding an honest investigation of how Clinton failed to read the mood in swing states and how her Brooklyn operation misread polling data.

I can answer that.

They failed to factor in that people are tired of having candidates forced on them.

Someone gets it. Ya, something is broken here.

Denny

I got a feeling more than just "something" will get broken.

Speaking of broken? I just like to know what happen to Harry Reid's eye / face?

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: DaCook

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: xuenchen

They are demanding an honest investigation of how Clinton failed to read the mood in swing states and how her Brooklyn operation misread polling data.

I can answer that.

They failed to factor in that people are tired of having candidates forced on them.

Someone gets it. Ya, something is broken here.

Denny

I got a feeling more than just "something" will get broken.

Speaking of broken? I just like to know what happen to Harry Reid's eye / face?

Actually nothing.

It was a fake knee jerk reaction to gain sympathy after the Republicans got control of the Senate in the 2014 elections.

Reid was booted down to minority leader from majority leader.

Plus he was under a couple of investigations too.

So let me get this straight. The mega donors who were able to donate as much money as they wanted anonymously through anonymously controlled Super PACs that had no controls at all over how they spent any of their money (and they knew this when they donated) now want accountability on how their anonymous donations were spent?

Sounds legit,

They paid but didn't get to play, and are now having buyers remorse.

The Clintons don't return other people's money...and they never spend their own.

originally posted by: Konduit
They paid but didn't get to play, and are now having buyers remorse.

Normal saying: "no deposit no return"

Clinton way: "big deposit no return"

Leave Hillary Alone!!!

So, old Hillary has a party, even a "bash" according to the source, to thank her biggest donors. So far, so good. Gotta thank your biggest supporters.

What stopped me was that all these people donated over a million dollars to her campaign.

More than a million god damn dollars. Each.

First off, how is that legal? I'm no expert at campaign finance law, but that's insane. Super PAC, anonymous, blah blah blah. We know who these people are, and what they thought they were doing. That shouldn't be allowed.

Second, it's actually kind of funny. I'm no big fan of Trump, but I'd take anyone, anyone at all, over Clinton. And these people each blew, absolutely wasted, over a million god damn dollars for her to lose anyway.

It would be even funnier if it wasn't so disgusting that this amount of money was flushed down the drain. A responsible, decent-hearted person could have changed so many lives for the better with that kind of loot, but of course that kind of person would not be running for the office.

Christ, is our system broken. Busted. $1.5 billion pissed away. For nothing, nothing positive to show for it.

Well, hopefully these folks get the answers they seek, though we all know there is no good way to explain any of this b.s.

Just another right wing conspiracy brought to you by Fox news and Rush Limbaugh.

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: VinylTyrant
$1.5 BILLION!!!!!!

For a campaign?????

And Trump spent about half as much--to win.

And 100 million of that was his own money even. Hillary to greedy for that. Trump even challenged her to inject 10 or 30 million of her own during the debate.

originally posted by: Stevemagegod
Just another right wing conspiracy brought to you by Fox news and Rush Limbaugh.

Got proof of that?

a reply to: schuyler

Yeah I could care less about both parties.
But I have to say,, against that type of money and power, to win is either an act of God or an act of Satan himself. As of now I go with the first, hoping it's not just a different lane on the same highway to he'll.
Trump baby

Ya'll paranoid. She spent it on Yoga lessons. Nothing to see here. Go back to your regularly scheduled infotainment.

a reply to: xuenchen

Life is GREAT!!!

But this will probably lead nowhere.
*sigh*

originally posted by: xuenchen
Looks like the big money people in the Clinton Campaign are questioning a few things.

Things like who got the money and what went wrong.

Some aren't necessarily buying the excuses offered so far either.

Interesting if audits and investigations turn up some illegal activities.

Maybe it was purple people eaters !!

Clinton Donors Want to Investigate How Hillary Spent $1.5 Billion in Campaign Donations

Clinton’s fallout is interestingly causing an internal revolution among Hillary’s big donors. At her New York bash to “thank” her big donors of $1 million or more, she took no blame and pointed the finger at Comey and Putin. Her spin did not work and she has lost a lot of credibility according to confidential sources. They were smart enough to realize that even if Russia “hacked” the DNC and Podesta emails, there would be no release if there had been no wrongdoing to begin with.

Now Clinton’s biggest backers want a “campaign autopsy,” which could expose Clinton’s entire operation. The donors are demanding to know where Clinton spent the near $1.5 billion in campaign resources she collected in the closing months. They want the receipts. They are demanding an honest investigation of how Clinton failed to read the mood in swing states and how her Brooklyn operation misread polling data.

The donors are not buying the Russian hack story. Putin isn’t the only explanation for her failure and they are now pointing the finger at Hillary. She never bothered to go to Wisconsin. The story running behind the curtain is that fundraisers are cutting off all donations to the Democratic Party until this honest review is carried out. They do not want to hear about Comey and Putin.

Bad source as usual. More spam.

Do you even try to be credible? The premise of the entire article (which is actually another poorly written blog post) is about big donors backing away from the Democrats, but it doesn't provide any source and only refers to donors as "they" while the article openly admits to using gossip.

Notice this little tidbit at the end of the article? "The story running behind the curtain is that...". Lol. Again. If you want people with brains to take you seriously then you're going to have to do a lot better than this. Ffs, the only citations they have are Trump and Bill Clinton quotes. Here's a quarter. Buy a clue.

Do you get all your news from TMZ?



Stop spamming

Provide a better source or you'll need to be reminded that CLINTON LOST, GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!