Clinton Donors Want to Investigate How Hillary Spent $1.5 Billion in Campaign Donations

Looks like the big money people in the Clinton Campaign are questioning a few things.

Things like who got the money and what went wrong.

Some aren't necessarily buying the excuses offered so far either.

Interesting if audits and investigations turn up some illegal activities.

Maybe it was purple people eaters !!

Clinton Donors Want to Investigate How Hillary Spent $1.5 Billion in Campaign Donations

Clinton’s fallout is interestingly causing an internal revolution among Hillary’s big donors. At her New York bash to “thank” her big donors of $1 million or more, she took no blame and pointed the finger at Comey and Putin. Her spin did not work and she has lost a lot of credibility according to confidential sources. They were smart enough to realize that even if Russia “hacked” the DNC and Podesta emails, there would be no release if there had been no wrongdoing to begin with.

Now Clinton’s biggest backers want a “campaign autopsy,” which could expose Clinton’s entire operation. The donors are demanding to know where Clinton spent the near $1.5 billion in campaign resources she collected in the closing months. They want the receipts. They are demanding an honest investigation of how Clinton failed to read the mood in swing states and how her Brooklyn operation misread polling data.

The donors are not buying the Russian hack story. Putin isn’t the only explanation for her failure and they are now pointing the finger at Hillary. She never bothered to go to Wisconsin. The story running behind the curtain is that fundraisers are cutting off all donations to the Democratic Party until this honest review is carried out. They do not want to hear about Comey and Putin.

a reply to: xuenchen

They are demanding an honest investigation of how Clinton failed to read the mood in swing states and how her Brooklyn operation misread polling data.

I can answer that.

They failed to factor in that people are tired of having candidates forced on them.

a reply to: xuenchen

Interesting if they do want to know. They should! However...

Your link is a blog and appears to be the original source.

So I wonder if it is true or not?

Their desire to know where the money went and why She lost is justified. I doubt if Hillary will provide them with anything more than half truths or outright lies though. When she gets challenged she gets kinda nasty from what I read.

These backers should have examined her better before donating to her, they should have backed Bernie instead.

I have nothing personal against the Clintons, I just do not think she was a good choice for president of this country. She should just enjoy her retirement and quit the deception. Maybe she is so deep into deception that it is hard to break away from it, I feel she believes some of the crap that she is saying.

Oh! S+F!!

This is going to be interesting and I would like to see how it unfolds.

Oh goody! Now we will get to find out how much snacks cost on pedophile island.

originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
Oh goody! Now we will get to find out how much snacks cost on pedophile island.

Pizza ain't cheap...

a reply to: xuenchen

It's not about the money. They are mad with her for obvious reasons.

One step closer to jail for her.

originally posted by: GreyScale
a reply to: xuenchen

Interesting if they do want to know. They should! However...Your link is a blog and appears to be the original source. So I wonder if it is true or not?

Would it be more true if it appeared on CNN? If anyone has been caught spewing "fake news" it's the MSM. I;d question what appears on CNN and MSNBC more than a normal blog.

originally posted by: GreyScale
a reply to: xuenchen

Interesting if they do want to know. They should! However...

Your link is a blog and appears to be the original source.

So I wonder if it is true or not?

Some other "sources" ..............

Democratic donors call for Clinton campaign post-mortem

As well they should.

However the article claims 'big time donors' and 'they'. It never once names who those donors are. It never once names which donor companies, just 'they'. It also says that donations from foreign nations have dried up, but it never says which foreign nations those donations came from.

Clinton lost. She was the wrong woman at the wrong time. And while I agree that the whole Democrat Party needs to do some very deep deep soul searching if they ever wish to be relevant again, articles like this one are just petty when they make vague claims like this one does.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: GreyScale
a reply to: xuenchen

Interesting if they do want to know. They should! However...

Your link is a blog and appears to be the original source.

So I wonder if it is true or not?

Some other "sources" ..............

Democratic donors call for Clinton campaign post-mortem

OK.. THAT appears to be the original source, not the one in your OP.

Thanks for clearing that up... S&F and let the autopsy begin!!!

a reply to: xuenchen

It must be true because Martin Armstrong says he has a "confidential source." That would be Martin Armstrong who spent seven years in prison for contempt of court during his fraud trial. Then pled guilty to fraud and was sentenced to five more years.

Clearly when he blogs that a confidential source told him something, people should believe him because he's got a decades long history of integrity.

Got a better source that doesn't have a decades long history of fraud?

a reply to: theantediluvian

If anything, his experience put him in the spot light. Ill take his word for it.

a reply to: xuenchen

So basically, people want to know why their candidate didn't win. Check. Post-election autoposies aren't new. I'm sure you're aware of the RNC doing them. You can bet that the RNC is going to be looking at how Trump won in hopes of incorporating parts of the strategy into future campaigns.

Somehow post-election SOP was spun to become the dubious basis for claims that DNC donors are calling for an investigation into possible malfeasance because... fake news?

If you were dumb and/or evil enough to give a creep like HRC any sum of money then you got more than you deserved. Imho opinion you deserve slow torture and misery. Among other things I won't even speak of here... Bet she gets her own place in hell, even Satan could not possibly tolerate her and would not like the power struggle. Someone please drone strike this p.o.s. into oblivion and make the Universe a better, safer, and less corrupt place to exist.

oh gee, another story from a right-wing blog....what impeccable journalism

a reply to: jimmyx

Oh, that's right, we're supposed to wait for CNN to lead a story, then we can talk about it.

a reply to: xuenchen

Maybe it was purple people eaters !!

I would not be surprised to find out that it was Russian hackers posing as a Nigerian prince:

Ms Clinton,
I am a Nigerian prince and I have $200,000,000,000,000,000,000 US dollars being held in a Nigerian bank. If you wire me $1.5 Billion US Dollars, I will be able to send it to you.

Yours truly,
Mjboto Mubotu
Nigerian Prince