It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: HUMBLEONE
originally posted by: BlueAjah
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: UKTruth
With wins in South Carolina, Arkansas, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee and West Virginia, President-elect Donald Trump has won 44 of the 270 votes he needs to formally win the presidency. Hillary Clinton meanwhile has won Vermont's three votes
So Trump is 44-3 up so far...
The electors that have been causing issues and taking it to court are from Colorado, Washington State and California. Those are states Clinton won so their attempt to vote for someone else hurts Clinton and doesnt affect Trump.
I read in various places that these Clinton faithless electors were trying to make a deal with Trump electors.
The deal was if they would vote for a Republican other than Trump, so would the Trump electors.
The goal was so that Trump would not get 270 and it would go to Congress.
I guess we will know soon how well that plan worked.
ETA: I think the end game goal was hoping Congress would choose Clinton re. the popular vote.
Thats not a deal! They should offer what Madonna offered! (until she welched on her offer! Since then, I have lost ALL respect for her)
They should have gotten Sam Smith up there to give the offer if they wanted to reach out to liberal men.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: UKTruth
and you are the one who believes everything you hear on the news also so...
It wasn't news. It was the elector himself speaking in an interview.
Death threats to get Republican electors to not vote for Trump. That is what he said.
originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: xuenchen
Do you know why they are replacing some electors?
This is below the video of Texas
In some states, if the electors don't vote for the candidate chosen by their party, they can face a fine. But here in Texas, the electors are not bound to vote for their party's choice -- in this case Donald Trump.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Texas just replaced another elector.
More coming !!
C-Span does not want anybody watching
Watch Texas here
originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: Xcathdra
oh, so they are supposedly NOT voting for Trump?
Is that the law, they MUST vote for Trump?
What law are they not following?
originally posted by: jjkenobi
a reply to: Xcathdra
Has there been any other election where the electoral college voting has been of any interest to anyone?
It's all a dog and pony show.
originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: Xcathdra
oh, so they are supposedly NOT voting for Trump?
Is that the law, they MUST vote for Trump?
What law are they not following?
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: xuenchen
hey xue, what does that mean when they replace an elector?
LOL
I'm not on your page or even in your book.