It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sirlancelot
Im cautiously optimistic about Trump and creating jobs. Obama was nothing more then a community organizer who never created a job while Trump has created 34,000 jobs according to CNN/Money!
originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: DBCowboy
Why would you want the American people to slave away when they could be living a relaxing lifestyle of welfare?
*Joke Warning*
originally posted by: stormcell
originally posted by: sirlancelot
Im cautiously optimistic about Trump and creating jobs. Obama was nothing more then a community organizer who never created a job while Trump has created 34,000 jobs according to CNN/Money!
Left wing parties are more concerned with wealth redistribution and addressing inequality. It's quicker and more popular raising taxes and handing out credit vouchers than to encourage companies to invest, especially when taxes are rising.
originally posted by: sirlancelot
Im cautiously optimistic about Trump and creating jobs. Obama was nothing more then a community organizer who never created a job while Trump has created 34,000 jobs according to CNN/Money!
originally posted by: Shr00mz
a reply to: buster2010
No one said Saudi is good now. They're buttering us up because knows if he don't pamper Trump bad things will happen. Remember Saudi king didn't have much faith in Trump and Trump cant stand him. We will know if he bows to him like others. Nothing wrong with trying to work out problems and/or differences, this proves Trump can have compassion and understanding.. and move to better America and bring strong foreign policies. Trump already made clear he don't take no # though.
originally posted by: matafuchs
WOW! So, the economy is going to tank after Trump huh? A giant move for one of the worlds largest tech companies.
50 billion dollars to invest and the CEO says they would have NEVER done this is Trump would not have been elected.
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: introvert
This was already in the works before Trump even won the election. This appears to be more theater than anything else.
And note that Saudi money is involved.
Indeed. Could you imagine the reactions this would get if it was Hillary instead of Trump?
Luckily, she isn't president and we won't have to worry about that.
Most people do not like to think about their own hypocrisy, so I can see why they wouldn't worry about it.
It says it's their money in a Saudi investment fund, not that it's Saudi money. There is a difference.
The addition of the Public Investment Fund boosts SoftBank’s investment firepower. The fund is central to Saudi Arabia’s plan to diversify its economy beyond oil. The plunge in crude prices since 2014 has hurt the finances of the kingdom, which depends on oil income for more than two-thirds of government revenue. Last year, Saudi Arabia’s budget deficit was a record $98 billion, or 16% of gross domestic product.
The Saudi government is expanding the scope and size of the PIF, effectively turning it into a war chest for non-oil investments abroad. In June, it invested $3.5 billion in Uber, its largest overseas bet.
Riyadh plans to transfer ownership of state-owned oil giant Saudi Arabian Oil Co., or Aramco, to the fund, which Saudi Deputy Crown Prince Mohammedbin Salman estimated will eventually be worth nearly $3 trillion.
originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: theantediluvian
He handed his business to his family. Of course he will still pull strings but he will do it legally.
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Indigo5
He sold all of his stocks in June.
What is wrong with ANY company saying they want to invest in US jobs and infrastructure?
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: Indigo5
Did you make this up because from a business standpoint you seem clueless.
Softbank is a Japanese investment firm in fact they own half if sprint. The deal your referring to from October has nothing to do with this unless you know otherwise.
That was setting up an investment fund for a client namely Saudi arabia.
The investment, which could create 50,000 new U.S. jobs, revived speculation on Wall Street that U.S. telecommunications giant Sprint Corp, 82-percent-owned by SoftBank, might rekinkdle merger talks with T-Mobile US Inc that died under pressure from U.S. regulators.
The investment announced Tuesday would come from the $100 billion investment fund SoftBank Chief Executive Masayoshi Son is setting up with Saudi Arabia’s sovereign-wealth fund and other potential partners, according to the Wall Street Journal.
It was not immediately clear how much of SoftBank’s investment had been disclosed before.
Softbank said on Nov. 7, the day before the U.S. election, it planned to make future large-scale investments via the $100 billion tech fund, rather than on its own, to avoid growing already-bloated debt.
As Dow Jones adds, $50 billion of the $100 billion investment will come from a joint investment fund Softbank had set up with Saudi Arabia.
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: Indigo5
Because they made a deal in October with the Saudis who invested 30 billion by the way you somehow morphed that into a deal with softbank for 500 billion. 30 billion is a far cry from 500 but I would love to see your source that is where softbank is getting the funds from have any??
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: Indigo5
Now the Saudi thing yes Saudi invests in markets oh nooooooos real shocker there.
Did you make this up because from a business standpoint you seem clueless. Softbank is a Japanese investment firm in fact they own half if sprint.
The deal your referring to from October has nothing to do with this unless you know otherwise.
That was setting up an investment fund for a client namely Saudi arabia.