U.S. 2016 - Presidential Election VOTE RECOUNTS - - An Ongoing Status Thread.

Here's the update....

Recounts aren't going to matter squat.

Though it would be nice for the process to bring some visibility to the absurdity of things like not requiring ID to vote or motor voter states, where it doesn't even matter if you're on the roster or a citizen, as long as you have a drivers license.

Not sure how many folks remember this, but voting is actually a PRIVILEGE of citizenship, that you gain when basically saying you will participate in government (i.e. being available for Jury Duty, etc.). So yes, you need to prove that you are ELIGIBLE as a participating citizen to vote folks.

originally posted by: UKTruth
This is becoming more evident as now John Podesta has demanded that the 538 electoral college representatives each hear evidence of Russian hacking in private meetings... they have moved on to plan C.

Is that even legal? kosher? appropriate??

ETA
Well...FFS!
Does this name look familiar....one of the 10 who want this to happen.....

The list of electors includes Christine Pelosi, a daughter of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, Rep.-elect Carol Shea-Porter and Terie Norelli, a former speaker of the New Hampshire House of Representatives.

www.wmal.com...

a reply to: DontTreadOnMe

Since when have legalities ever mattered to Clinton / Democrats?

a reply to: DontTreadOnMe

What this activist electors with links to the Democrats in higher positions are asking is illegal they are becoming anarchist and are trying to influence other electoral voters, for this they should be excused from the electoral voters pool and should never be allowed to vote again.

This people in particular have personal relationships with the loser party and former presidential candidate, their motives are bias, suspicious and irregular.

They can not have briefings because they are supposed to be regular American citizens and have not security clearance of any kind.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Wisconsin Final Recount Results

Trump +874
Clinton +712

Net Trump +162


Jill Stein +66

This is the full explanation of changes:
elections.wi.gov...

This part is interesting:

Milwaukee County : Increase of 246 votes in City of Milwaukee Ward 34 due to a discrepancy in the original results. The total ballots for Trump/Pence should have been 254 instead of the 8 reported.

That is not really a clear explanation of what would cause such a large "discrepancy".

Thankyou SO MUCH for keeping us up-to-date on this Wisconsin recount. In Milwaukee, they drink BEER and eat CHEESE all day and night. The 246 Trump ballots were probably "misplaced" by some drunk/gorged polling place honcho who thought he could swing the election to Clinton!

Are we to assume that this recount fiasco is now behind us, and Democrats are preparing their next strategy to de-legitimize the Presidential election results? Maybe the RUSSIANS will be the next boogey-man. Never mind that Hillary was a phucked up candidate.

a reply to: carewemust

Well I guess the big discrepancy can not be explained, oops let see, they probably will blame the Russians for it.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: carewemust

Well I guess the big discrepancy can not be explained, oops let see, they probably will blame the Russians for it.

Russian agents bought off the recount authorities.

Simple explanation.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Wisconsin Final Recount Results

Trump +874
Clinton +712

Net Trump +162


Jill Stein +66

This is the full explanation of changes:
elections.wi.gov...

This part is interesting:

Milwaukee County : Increase of 246 votes in City of Milwaukee Ward 34 due to a discrepancy in the original results. The total ballots for Trump/Pence should have been 254 instead of the 8 reported.

That is not really a clear explanation of what would cause such a large "discrepancy".

Thankyou SO MUCH for keeping us up-to-date on this Wisconsin recount. In Milwaukee, they drink BEER and eat CHEESE all day and night. The 246 Trump ballots were probably "misplaced" by some drunk/gorged polling place honcho who thought he could swing the election to Clinton!

Are we to assume that this recount fiasco is now behind us, and Democrats are preparing their next strategy to de-legitimize the Presidential election results? Maybe the RUSSIANS will be the next boogey-man. Never mind that Hillary was a phucked up candidate.

Completely agree.. Thank you.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
The final results are in:

The Latest: Trump’s Wisconsin victory secure after recount

The final results for Wisconsin are: +162 for Trump. And no signs of any trouble.

Pennsylvania Officially Certified Donald Trump as the victor in that state today as well.
www.nytimes.com...

This whole recount is getting redundant.

I sure hope it ends soon.

originally posted by: PillarOfFire
This whole recount is getting redundant.

I sure hope it ends soon.

It is over.

Trump is now at 2-0.

The big event is on Monday 19th when the real election happens.

a reply to: UKTruth

Thanks that's good to know!

originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe

originally posted by: UKTruth
This is becoming more evident as now John Podesta has demanded that the 538 electoral college representatives each hear evidence of Russian hacking in private meetings... they have moved on to plan C.

Is that even legal? kosher? appropriate??

ETA
Well...FFS!
Does this name look familiar....one of the 10 who want this to happen.....

The list of electors includes Christine Pelosi, a daughter of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, Rep.-elect Carol Shea-Porter and Terie Norelli, a former speaker of the New Hampshire House of Representatives.

www.wmal.com...

I doubt it is legal but even if it is it's not ethical for one side to get a hearing with the electors, in private, to try to sway them. It would be like allowing the defence or prosecution in the room with a jury whilst they were deliberating.

New thread - Federal judge has ruled electors must vote for the person who won the state (Colorado).

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Jill Stein Spent $1 million of the funds raised for the recount on her staff. That's some crazy high overhead, isn't it?!

Full Story: www.foxnews.com...

originally posted by: carewemust
Jill Stein Spent $1 million of the funds raised for the recount on her staff. That's some crazy high overhead, isn't it?!

Full Story: www.foxnews.com...

Ah.

So THAT's where the con was focused.

Not a bad take.

originally posted by: carewemust
Jill Stein Spent $1 million of the funds raised for the recount on her staff. That's some crazy high overhead, isn't it?!

Full Story: www.foxnews.com...

so she is using the Clinton Foundation Business model.

Some additional interesting statistics on how Jill Stein spent the recount funds.

Story: freebeacon.com...

$1.6 million in Attorney fees just to prove that the system works.

originally posted by: carewemust
Some additional interesting statistics on how Jill Stein spent the recount funds.

Story: freebeacon.com...

$1.6 million in Attorney fees just to prove that the system works.

I somehow don't think she will be back doing interviews and holding press conferences outside Trump Tower now that she has been caught stealing people's money.