originally posted by: Blue Shift
I'd be more impressed if they were actually accurate.
This is an interesting observation. The map is actually surprisingly accurate in my opinion, it is just skewed more as if it was accounting for the
curvature of a larger sphere than what we accept as the size of earth, being plotted on flat paper.
Just to be clear, I am conceptually arguing the idea that the earth is larger than TPTB will admit, and we have been surrounded by an ice mass
(natural or otherwise) that we consider as Antarctica. Beyond the ice barrier could be other intelligent life, a breakaway civilization, etc. They may
look at us the way we look at a tribe in the Amazon. They just leave us be. Maybe that’s where UFO’s come from. Who knows. I’m floating this as
an interesting concept because it’s been on my mind since I saw the map.
In support of this theory, I think one possibility if the map is legitimate, is that it doesn’t show a flat earth, but a larger earth where the
continents we are familiar with are completely surrounded by this large ice mass. We may know this ice ring as Antarctica. The flat earth theory of
being encircled by an ice wall could be just a misinterpretation of the observation that the circumference of Antarctica is many times what we admit
it to be on maps. They think we’re on flat earth surrounded by an ice wall. I propose a larger globe where the continents we are familiar with are
actually all in the norther hemisphere. So instead of a wall it just becomes an ice mass encircling the entire globe at that norther latitude.
Then below that ice mass you have the other continents we can see on the map. Some close to the edge would be near the actual South Pole. Other near
the ring may be near or at the actual equator. Also the landmasses outside of the ice ring would be much smaller than represented on the map as they
are distorted by nature of the map being centered on the North Pole and them being in the Southern Hemisphere mostly.
I don’t buy the idea that these continents are all just Antarctica from different approaches. They are mapped much too precisely, some even with
water bodies within shown. Based on the accuracy of the inner map I would assume the same accuracy of the rest of the land masses. Again, if this is a
real map.
Some other notable properties of this theory are that all of the typical flat earth anti arguments fall short. The earth is still round, Antarctica
would still be a place you could travel to (assuming you are prevented from attempting to circumnavigate it, and you are not allowed to cross it while
flying over it, both of which happen to be somewhat true). There would still be a round horizon, and none of the do at home tests really have the
precision to say wether the earth is 2x as large as claimed. Sure I’ve ridden in an airplane, but can I really extrapolate the size of the earth
from my view out the window? Also, isn’t it strange that we have the largest ratio of moon size to planet size that we have ever observed?
Wouldn’t it make more sense if the earth were actually larger? GPS satellites could compensate for the actual size, and programmers building
software that use them would be none the wiser. It wouldn’t be the most difficult thing to keep secret. Even the video you see from the ISS isn’t
far enough out to see entire size of earth, just the relative area it is over.
So I challenge someone to convince me that my baseless theory is wrong. I am aware we have to write off all of the images from DSCOVR as altered or
fake, as well as the original blue pearl from 1973.
edit on 19-10-2019 by NewPerspectiveHomie because: More
edit on 19-10-2019 by NewPerspectiveHomie because: Clarification
edit on 19-10-2019 by NewPerspectiveHomie because: (no reason given)
edit on 19-10-2019 by NewPerspectiveHomie
because: (no reason given)
edit on 19-10-2019 by NewPerspectiveHomie because: (no reason given)
edit on 19-10-2019 by
NewPerspectiveHomie because: (no reason given)
edit on 19-10-2019 by NewPerspectiveHomie because: (no reason
given)
edit on 19-10-2019 by NewPerspectiveHomie because: (no reason given)