Feminism now targeting: Mansplaining

originally posted by: RedDragon
Obviously,

No, you should start with facts when people discredit your logic. You have never even read this persons material and you're going with that assumption? How can you even deny your own ignorant bias at this point?

a reply to: Annee

Total lie. Nothing has changed the decades since women joined the workforce.

Nothing changed as men first entered the fields of science as they first developed either.

If you look at a sample of modern women they will still conform to this pattern and nothing has changed there. There won't be born more intelligent woman just because more of them choose a career in academia, that's preposterous. From where would you even get such an absurd notion from?

The women that pursue an intellectual career will develop their intellect.. that is all. And from that little bit of information you invent this whole theory of yours. Simply ridiculous. This is supposed to change the genes responsible for intelligence in the whole gene pool? And how many totally implausible assumptions did you make to create this childish hypothesis of yours?

It's a total fabrication on your part. There is no evidence at all for this flimsy assertion of yours.

This difference between men and women is rooted in biology and nothing about the collective intelligence of women have changed in several decades. Your hypothesis is dead.

Besides, there is already an explanation. There is as many severely unintelligent men out there as there are geniuses.. so this discrepancy is already accounted for. There is already a balance, the general IQ of men and women are still roughly the same. These women idiots do not exist because there is no need to account for any significant population of geniuses.

Or do you perhaps imagine that a new crop of idiot women will also turn up as there's all of a sudden 8 TIMES AS MANY genius level women? So as to balance the situation? No.. those women won't show up and all of your assertions are based on total fantasies.

originally posted by: DeadMoonJester
a reply to: Annee

If you look at a sample of modern women they will still conform to this pattern and nothing has changed there. There won't be born more intelligent woman just because more of them choose a career in academia, that's preposterous. From where would you even get such an absurd notion from?

Here's one way to get there:

en.wikipedia.org...

The plastic brain. How the brain changes when it learns.

Stuff I've found fascinating and followed for a while.

I'm gonna keep learning.

You all do what you want.

a reply to: imjack

You're talking gibberish.

No gas has been closed. Genius level men still outnumber women 8 times to 1 and nothing at all has changed there. Because it's biology and because it's accounted for by 8 times as many idiot men..

The truth is it's likely there's not even any data on this. You completely made that fact up..

Please apologise and rectify this situation immediately.

a reply to: RedDragon

This is humanity in general.. not women only.

And it has no bearing on the fact that genius level men still outnumber genius level women 8 to 1..

Why is this FACT so painful for some of you here?

Deal with reality please I have no time to deal with recalcitrant children throwing temper tantrums.

It's time to put your big boy pants on liberals.

a reply to: RedDragon

This is humanity in general.. not women only.

And it has no bearing on the fact that genius level men still outnumber genius level women 8 to 1..

Why is this FACT so painful for some of you here?

Deal with reality please I have no time to deal with recalcitrant children throwing temper tantrums.

It's time to put your big boy pants on liberals.

a reply to: RedDragon

This is humanity in general.. not women only.

And it has no bearing on the fact that genius level men still outnumber genius level women 8 to 1..

Why is this FACT so painful for some of you here?

Deal with reality please I have no time to deal with recalcitrant children throwing temper tantrums.

It's time to put your big boy pants on liberals.

a reply to: RedDragon

No, facts and data aren't the way to respond to someone who is "gonna keep learning".

The proper response is...

"You can post whatever you want. Whatever report you find. Whatever, whatever."

"Ben Barres is a little cuckoo."

"I'm not saying stuff like that doesn't happen. Just not sure everything Ben says is 100%."

Dismissals and ad hominem, that's how you discuss things with someone who is interested in learning.

originally posted by: DeadMoonJester
a reply to: imjack

You're talking gibberish.

No gas has been closed.

I assume you mean 'gap'. Yes there is/was a gap that's been closing. It was at 5 points difference for like 100 years, however the test itself had methodology changes to help curb this. Now it's vague and people like RedDragon quote 2% as if it's statistically relevant at all. It's not.

In other words, the IQ test itself was sexist for a long time.

It also doesn't take genius level IQ to be an Engineer. Get off your high horse.

wtf.

originally posted by: angeldoll
wtf.

Yes, this is definitely a thing I was just reading an article about unions having hotlines to report mansplaining. I think it is going too far. Glenn Beck was on CNN the other day, and he was talking about how all the false claims of racism (think micro-aggressions) made us forget about the real racists out there.

originally posted by: darkbake
Yes, this is definitely a thing I was just reading an article about unions having hotlines to report mansplaining. I think it is going too far. Glenn Beck was on CNN the other day, and he was talking about how all the false claims of racism (think micro-aggressions) made us forget about the real racists out there.

If you say something to someone and they get offended.

Why not apologize and ask them to explain why it was offensive.

Sometimes, you really don't know why.

a reply to: imjack

This is no gap that I have mentioned and nothing you say has any bearing on what I've been saying. All my points still stand..

I also don't know why you are talking about engineers.. acting as if I am one?

It is time for you to stop acting delusionally now. I have no horse, and if I had one it certainly wouldn't be doing drugs.

I also expect you to apologise immediately for having the temerity to call me an engineer. I don't take kindly to such slander.

originally posted by: imjack

originally posted by: DeadMoonJester
a reply to: imjack

You're talking gibberish.

No gas has been closed.

I assume you mean 'gap'. Yes there is/was a gap that's been closing. It was at 5 points difference for like 100 years, however the test itself had methodology changes to help curb this. Now it's vague and people like RedDragon quote 2% as if it's statistically relevant at all. It's not.

In other words, the IQ test itself was sexist for a long time.

It also doesn't take genius level IQ to be an Engineer. Get off your high horse.

The only person talking about a 2 point IQ difference between men and women is you. You brought it up and you're the only person talking about it. It's completely irrelevant to anything.

originally posted by: DeadMoonJester
a reply to: imjack

This is no gap that I have mentioned and nothing you say has any bearing on what I've been saying. All my points still stand..

I also don't know why you are talking about engineers.. acting as if I am one?

It is time for you to stop acting delusionally now. I have no horse, and if I had one it certainly wouldn't be doing drugs.

I also expect you to apologise immediately for having the temerity to call me an engineer. I don't take kindly to such slander.

My IQ is 152, and I'm an Engineer btw. You would understand the relevance if you read the thread I guess? Good luck(in life and stuff).

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: darkbake
Yes, this is definitely a thing I was just reading an article about unions having hotlines to report mansplaining. I think it is going too far. Glenn Beck was on CNN the other day, and he was talking about how all the false claims of racism (think micro-aggressions) made us forget about the real racists out there.

If you say something to someone and they get offended.

Why not apologize and ask them to explain why it was offensive.

Sometimes, you really don't know why.

The better question is why don't you educate them on micro-aggression and how by them being offended first, is offensive? Sheeeeesh.

I mean you expect them to care about YOUR feelings, when you hurt their feelings, and they respond!?

What selfish people! How else would I go around telling people to suck my ****! It's like where are my rights man? I'm constantly oppressed!

originally posted by: RedDragon

originally posted by: imjack

originally posted by: DeadMoonJester
a reply to: imjack

You're talking gibberish.

No gas has been closed.

I assume you mean 'gap'. Yes there is/was a gap that's been closing. It was at 5 points difference for like 100 years, however the test itself had methodology changes to help curb this. Now it's vague and people like RedDragon quote 2% as if it's statistically relevant at all. It's not.

In other words, the IQ test itself was sexist for a long time.

It also doesn't take genius level IQ to be an Engineer. Get off your high horse.

The only person talking about a 2 point IQ difference between men and women is you. You brought it up and you're the only person talking about it. It's completely irrelevant to anything.

2 point? you can't even read the post you quoted, that says percent. I think we can end the detective game there if we're both so "bad" at it.

originally posted by: imjack

originally posted by: DeadMoonJester
a reply to: imjack

This is no gap that I have mentioned and nothing you say has any bearing on what I've been saying. All my points still stand..

I also don't know why you are talking about engineers.. acting as if I am one?

It is time for you to stop acting delusionally now. I have no horse, and if I had one it certainly wouldn't be doing drugs.

I also expect you to apologise immediately for having the temerity to call me an engineer. I don't take kindly to such slander.

My IQ is 152, and I'm an Engineer btw. You would understand the relevance if you read the thread I guess? Good luck(in life and stuff).

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: darkbake
Yes, this is definitely a thing I was just reading an article about unions having hotlines to report mansplaining. I think it is going too far. Glenn Beck was on CNN the other day, and he was talking about how all the false claims of racism (think micro-aggressions) made us forget about the real racists out there.

If you say something to someone and they get offended.

Why not apologize and ask them to explain why it was offensive.

Sometimes, you really don't know why.

The better question is why don't you educate them on micro-aggression and how by them being offended first, is offensive? Sheeeeesh.

I mean you expect them to care about YOUR feelings, when you hurt their feelings, and they respond!?

What selfish people! How else would I go around telling people to suck my ****! It's like where are my rights man? I'm constantly oppressed!

I prefer to start at the beginning.

The beginning is - - why are you offended.

Hopefully, they're open to further discussion.

EDIT: Wait, I'm supposed to be offended - - because they're offended?

Man is that ever a "one upmanship" disaster waiting to escalate. What's the point? My ego?

a reply to: imjack

Yes, and you're still wrong and you still haven't refuted anything I've said.

You're an engineer? Pfft... Ok, at least that explains it.

Only 152? That low? Pfft... At least you're funny.