It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: thepixelpusher
This thread title is click bait, riffing off the election unease.
so why is it so different from all the other posts "riffing off the election unease"? I've seen far more about the violence against the trump supporters, but hardly anything about the harassment that's been going on against the minority groups by the trump supporters. although, I do know there are some....
Because the thread title is false and misleading. The woman states she needed no attention or hospital visit and the police noticed no signs of injury, yet the OP states she was viciously beaten. Huh? Threads discussing the election topics typically have better evidence and arguments than this one.
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
originally posted by: muzzleflash
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: muzzleflash
There is too much to be sceptical about in these stories. The political stuff seems tacked on, no license plate, no pictures, no video, no credit card, and in a "liberal bubble".
Keep us posted on the outcome.
I understand.
But skepticism aside, my main message, I believe, stands strong:
Our political turmoil has gone too far and the violence is unacceptable.
I agree, but can you convince the Hillary supporters to stop beating the crap out of Trump supporters who to this day have hundreds of youtube videos showing them getting mauled by roving gangs of SJWs.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: thepixelpusher
some do, many don't!!
let's see, we have someone who personally knows the women, the op...
we have three newspaper articles about it, that includes a governors statement on it. a whole crapload of comments on the restaurants facebook page commenting on it...
the most recent thread I've seen about the evil demonstrators went something like this...
it had a video, and kind of a gleeful, hey look at this, anti-trump demonstrator gets maced when he tries to steal pro-trump sign!!!
only the video didn't show him taking any sign and the lady that maced him didn't have a sign...
so, there was no evidence of that one...
and now it's gone...
it seems like there is a tad bit more evidence for this one... I can't help it that it's not coming from fox news or some other ones on your approved media lists. most of the local news media isn't on your list and quite frankly they are probably the most accurate sources, since they are catering to the area where the even happened and are more at risk of being called out if the story isn't accurate by a witness to the event.
originally posted by: Godabove09
a reply to: dawnstar
Yeah...well I find the idea of sharing this world with whining, divisive, immature little bullies who have the temerity to call themselves "liberals", when they are about as intolerant and irrational as it gets, a chore too...so we agree on something.
It seems the logical inference is to go our separate ways?
America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand, all infecred by cancerous leftist agitators.
So let's break away into two parts, each nation divided into those who espouse Marxist drivel and those who, despite the right wing label, are the silent, moderate, majority.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Darkphoenix77
I think the problem is that I think that if this story was present with the exact same fact, only the players were the other way around....
they'd all be accepting it as fact!! I'd be perfectly happy to admit that there are crazies on both sides doing stupid things but the idea that unless the story supports my view of the world, well it's just fake.. is just getting to be too much for me I guess. or maybe it's that I think that as long as we go thinking we all so perfect and you guys are just demons in disguise, well, this is just gonna escalate till we are all under martial law, and I don't think any of us really want that.
originally posted by: Godabove09
a reply to: muzzleflash
You "don't believe this incident should have a political side or slant"...is that right?
Why is it in the political section with the heading "Female viciously beaten by man over Trump argument at Brooklyn restaurant"?
You really are so transparent and grubby.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: thepixelpusher
and.... where's the evidence on that story??
And so - just as in Ferguson and Charlotte - we see what appears to be professional agitators popping up at key times to encourage social unrest (which as we recently detailed were funded from George Soros' MoveOn.org), all of which perhaps explains why these 'professionals' were so adamant not be filmed or 'caught on tape' as GatewayPundit reports, reporters in Portland, Oregon were attacked by anti-Trump rioters Sunday night, according to Portland Police. The protesters also handed out leaflets warning people to not record the riots.
originally posted by: anonfamily
She hates Trump, probably supports Clinton. Knowing Clinton supporters, she probably instigated the entire thing and is now playing the victim.
She is probably upset over Clinton's loss. Got in the guys face and raged thinking she is a woman and he can't touch her. Then when he snapped, she instantly went into the victim role.
I'd put my money on it.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: thepixelpusher
and.... where's the evidence on that story??
www.washingtontimes.com...