It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: beeeyotch
Funny part is that it backfired this time. They provoked and insulted citizens throughout the country. Everytime a Hollywood actor would make a joke and say that's why Trump will never be president, millions of people would see that and think " ok we'll see smartass". Everytime they said "the uneducated' , Im like hello? minorities have some uneducated people too, Im sure they take offense. But then again some people cant see that stuff like some of us can.
I see racial harmony as all of us having good jobs and working together, being able to buy nice cars and a nice house and all have out own goals and plans. We will be working together and the work place can create bonds like no other. I don't think the liberal media will stand for that, for some reason they need racial division. Now to be fair, fox news only reports cop on black incidences as well. No wonder black people think the cops are after them and why cops are getting shot, that's all they report in the media is cop on black, never cop on white incidences.
Tonight they are focusing on the protests and riots, the guest are saying " its gonna grow too in every city",," its not going to stop" etc, inciting and provoking people into thinking that has a purpose. Once again, it wont work, just because the media says it will grow doesn't mean it will, haven't they learned their lesson yet ? I feel sorry for these people that cant handle loss, ive handles it lots in my life and it sucks but like death, theres nothing you can do about it.
originally posted by: EternalShadow
Maybe the FEMA camps are for them.
That would be a twist...
originally posted by: Hefficide
... And even then I realize that everything - all of it could be misleading or untrue anyway.
originally posted by: Hefficide
a reply to: alphabetaone
My approach would be the old adage about never believing anything you hear and only half of what you see.
In practical terms I suppose that would imply an approach that avoids absolutist behaviors. An off the wall example - and one that hopefully won't trigger anyone...
I'm vaguely aware that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are divorcing. I'm also vaguely aware that Pitt supposedly had anger issues that led to the divorce. Working from that information I could potentially conclude that Pitt is a monster, or that Jolie is a lying manipulator out to smear an innocent man for nefarious purposes...
Or I could filter the information I have with my own life experiences and conclude that I don't know much about it and that chances are there are two sides and that both probably have their own merits and their own shortcomings.