It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: underwerks
Is there a specific law that says that once a concession is offered its over?
originally posted by: Ohanka
a reply to: underwerks
They're not going to pull anything.
Most of them can't by law, and even if they did, there would be an ungodly uproar.
The majority of states voted for Trump, electors represent their state and will vote in line with how the people of their state voted.
I hear they're all by the book kind of guys. Except that one person who said he wouldn't vote for Hillary even if she won his state I guess.
originally posted by: Ohanka
a reply to: underwerks
Numerous states do in fact have laws that bind electoral votes.
Some void them if they are faithless votes.
Faithless electors are very rare indeed. Only 175 in the past 300 years and however many elections that is (38 I think)
originally posted by: theantediluvian
Nobody on this site is more anti-Trump than me, it stings knowing that the person you voted for won the popular vote and lost the electoral college — and this is twice in 16 years —
originally posted by: Tardacus
you don`t get to be elector by being wishy washy, the electors are all die hard party loyalists there`s no way a republican elector will cast their vote for Hillary.
originally posted by: burntheships
This is premature speculation...at this point even CNN projects
Trump with the majority of the popular vote, and electoral votes.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: burntheships
This is premature speculation...at this point even CNN projects
Trump with the majority of the popular vote, and electoral votes.
Not anymore. CNN is not projecting either one to win the popular vote, right now.
Link
I keep feeling like another shoe is going to drop.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: underwerks
29 states have laws preventing faithless electors from ruining the will of their state's voters. Of the 21 which do not have such laws, only PA and NH were close contests (In fact, Trump took over 50% of the vote in 25 of the states he won... that's in a 4 candidate race). In all likelihood, Trump has won Michigan and their 16 electoral votes, pushing him to 306... So let's say all 20 of PA's electors go rogue. Still leaves Trump at 286. Let's say Utah's 6 make a religious statement and vote for McMullin... Trump still at 280. The rest of the states without laws blocking faithless electors are all very large wins for Trump or states Clinton won. I can tell you this, if an elector from one of the states where he won big voted against him and swung the election, that elector probably would be wise to not set foot back in their home state because they'd not likely survive to see the next sunrise.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
hillary would need more than 20 republican electorates to change sides. I think historically there has been 1? I have a hard time with the idea that the people who voted for Trump to win those electoral votes sitting quietly while being disenfranchised. You think there are riots now? Wait until this happens...
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
hillary would need more than 20 republican electorates to change sides. I think historically there has been 1? I have a hard time with the idea that the people who voted for Trump to win those electoral votes sitting quietly while being disenfranchised. You think there are riots now? Wait until this happens...
That's what I was thinking as well. Maybe that's the plan.