It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But there is a last, incredible long shot that could still get Hillary Clinton into the White House on Jan. 20 -- a twist in the Electoral College. Clinton led the popular vote by more than 337,000 as of Thursday evening, according to Associated Press results compiled by Google. With the addition of Arizona's late-called race, Trump had 290 Electoral College votes to Clinton’s 228. Only Michigan and New Hampshire remain uncalled. Under the U.S. Constitution, electors will meet in their respective state capitals on Dec. 19. In all states but Maine and Nebraska -- which split their votes by statewide popular results and individual congressional district -- the candidate who wins the popular vote traditionally gains all of that state's electoral votes.
The number of electoral votes per state is determined by the number of congressional districts plus one for each senator, for a total of 538. But there is nothing in the Constitution that prevents any of the electors from refusing to support the candidate who won their state, or from abstaining. Twenty-nine states ban the "faithless elector" practice. A petition on Change.org is pushing for electors to vote for Clinton instead of Trump. It had more than 175,000 signatures as of Thursday morning; by early evening, it had more than 1.3 million.
It seems a petition for the delegates to vote for Hillary has reached 1.3 million signatures:
originally posted by: crisco23
As far as i know they can petition all they want! At the end of the day, she conceeded...therefore fun is fun and Done is DONE. Maybe wrong but dont think so
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: charlyv
What a waste of good paper. Probably bond, as well.
Petitions are all done online, silly.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
Even if she won the two remaining states that are uncalled (Michigan & New Hampshire) she would still have a total electoral vote of less than 270.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
And besides...
If you tally up all the votes that Johnson & Stein received and add them with the votes that Trump received, the combined majority of voters in this country voted against a Hillary Clinton presidency.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
And besides...
If you tally up all the votes that Johnson & Stein received and add them with the votes that Trump received, the combined majority of voters in this country voted against a Hillary Clinton presidency.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: underwerks
Nobody on this site is more anti-Trump than me, it stings knowing that the person you voted for won the popular vote and lost the electoral college — and this is twice in 16 years — but no, I could never support this.
Injecting uncertainty into the transfer of power would damage us as a nation, it would be bad for us as a people and the effects would ripple outward from us.
He won by our system and he will take office. If we want to change the election process, that's a discussion for the future.