It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RickinVa
I guess Fox news is still a unreliable news source.
Even though they announced Trump as President prior to CNN.
The end result of all of this?
Fox news comes out way on top as being the most truthful reporting site covering the election than all other news site combined.
originally posted by: JetBlackStare
a reply to: Greggers
That's easy for them to leak post-coverage. Convenient.
Their own media critic has been blasting their coverage for a while now, especially post-Brazille.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Good thread. Here's a pompous Van Jones virtue-signalling to America.
originally posted by: JetBlackStare
a reply to: Greggers
Regardless, convenient narrative. I really like Smerconish but he is nonetheless employed by CNN.
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: RickinVa
I guess Fox news is still a unreliable news source.
Even though they announced Trump as President prior to CNN.
The end result of all of this?
Fox news comes out way on top as being the most truthful reporting site covering the election than all other news site combined.
On his show this morning, Michael Smirconish discussed CNN's "late call" for Trump.
He said there was a phone call to all the reporters from the guy in charge, very early in the day (back when Clinton was still expected to win) when he told everyone it was more important that CNN makes the call correctly than that they make it first.
He didn't care if they got scooped. But he didn't want them to be embarrassed by calling a state wrong.
So, that's why the late call.
Most other media outlets beat CNN on making that call.
Although, if you watched CNN, they made it pretty darn clear Hillary was going to lose long before the call was made. King kept going back through PA county by county saying that he didn't see where Hillary could get the votes.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: RickinVa
I guess Fox news is still a unreliable news source.
Even though they announced Trump as President prior to CNN.
The end result of all of this?
Fox news comes out way on top as being the most truthful reporting site covering the election than all other news site combined.
On his show this morning, Michael Smirconish discussed CNN's "late call" for Trump.
He said there was a phone call to all the reporters from the guy in charge, very early in the day (back when Clinton was still expected to win) when he told everyone it was more important that CNN makes the call correctly than that they make it first.
He didn't care if they got scooped. But he didn't want them to be embarrassed by calling a state wrong.
So, that's why the late call.
Most other media outlets beat CNN on making that call.
Although, if you watched CNN, they made it pretty darn clear Hillary was going to lose long before the call was made. King kept going back through PA county by county saying that he didn't see where Hillary could get the votes.
CNN and the mainstream media have lots of problems that they need to be held accountable for.
However, I agree with their decision to not call a state until they were absolutely certain. To me, that is what good journalism should be.
However, CNN still sucks.
Cabal ASSETS based in entertainment where they hold the most public sway or we should say USED TO HOLD SUCH SWAY....lol.