It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: UKTruth
whilst any normal human being aware of the case has already dismissed the notion that he did anything wrong
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Greggers
From the ego that the public has seen, I would certainly see that to be true. However, would it be worth it?
If he is innocent, yes it would be worth it. He would stop her from coming forward again, for starters. Also, it would show the allegations for what they truly were.
The allegation shave already been shown for what they were, multiple times.
Not really.
At this point, it's all just speculation. A lawsuit would solidify it with details and carve it permanently into the public record.
LOL, a case with no evidence has been dropped.
There are no details.
We'll never know whether there was sufficient evidence because the evidence was never presented.
Let go of the propaganda. Free yourself.
As Voltaire said, "man is free at the moment he wishes to be"
I'm not pushing propaganda. I'm acknowledging that evidence -- if it exists -- will not be presented since there isn't going to be a trial.
Bummer.
Charges dropped a second time.
It's over.
Not unless Trump sues her, as she can always pop up later.
You do realise that anyone, and I mean anyone, can start a case against Trump and get it to the exact same point.
It can happen at any time, even today. Nothing other than the willingness to make things up is required.
Yes, I do realize that. And since this particular woman has shown a propensity to do this (twice now), I would fully expect Trump to take legal action to stop her.
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: UKTruth
whilst any normal human being aware of the case has already dismissed the notion that he did anything wrong
I doubt that.
And besides, the Trump we know would come after her, whether it was smart or not.
We'll never know whether there was sufficient evidence because the evidence was never presented.
originally posted by: MysticMadman
Ruh-roh...back to "release his taxes" and "he said he gropes pussies" for you Hitlery supporters.
Meanwhile..back at the Satanic Child slavery money laundering/racketeering operation the Clintons are running......
originally posted by: Dutchowl
There is a well known and by now blatantly predictable tactic used by the Clinton camp. If you're guilty of something and going to be accused of it, accuse your opponent of it to get as much of a smoke screen as possible. Trump and ties to Putin. That was said after Hillary was revealed as engineering a uranium sale to Russia. They tried to spin Trump's health as being bad when she was falling down and having seizures. Trump's a liar when she got nailed on giving false testimony on the emails. Now this.