Charges Against Trump Have Been Dropped

Kind of had a feeling this might happen. Only a few days before the election, the charges from the woman claiming Trump raped her, have been dropped.

The woman who alleged that Donald Trump sexually assaulted her at billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's notorious 'sex parties' in 1994 when she was a 13-year-old has dropped the civil lawsuit that was filed against him.

www.dailymail.co.uk... ml

a reply to: JinMI

The Dems don't follow through with their false allegations they like to just imply rape or impropriety without actually having to come up with proof. Usually making false claims is enough. See Julian Assange.

a reply to: JinMI

Well, well, well...

Vindicated yet AGAIN.

S & F OP nice work.

Trump 2016 MAGA

a reply to: JinMI

Why aren't there Democrats asking for this lady's resignation, or at least prosecution, for interfering with an election? Oh because it hurts Trump and not Hillary...

This was predicted also... Hillary is infamous for getting people to make false rape claims against her enemies.

So I either the death threats got to much for her or she made up the story. Fantastic this clears up nothing.

hahahahaaaaaaa,,,, wonder if her lawyer was the same superdelegate that represented the dozen lying women that said Trump tried to hit on them.

a reply to: Pyle

Death threats against whom? Her identity has been kept very secret.

originally posted by: beeeyotch
hahahahaaaaaaa,,,, wonder if her lawyer was the same superdelegate that represented the dozen lying women that said Trump tried to hit on them.

Her daughter, I'm not kidding.

Not shocking, as most of us already knew this allegation was a farce.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

So , the only pedophile perverts in the race are the Clintons ?

originally posted by: beeeyotch
hahahahaaaaaaa,,,, wonder if her lawyer was the same superdelegate that represented the dozen lying women that said Trump tried to hit on them.

Funny enough it was actually her daughter.

a reply to: JinMI

The ones her attorney claimed she received. I dont have the information on how they got to her. But if I had to guess they could have come through her publicly known attorney or posted openly on social media.

a reply to: JinMI

So we can file this one under a repeat of "false allegations to destroy reputation" of someone who has angered the Controllers.

Now WJC's relationship to Epstein stands out far more boldly and disturbingly.

a reply to: JinMI

Thanks for finding and posting this information JinMI. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are moving in opposite directions. All good for Donald. All bad for Hillary.

They should put bars on the windows of the White House to keep the criminals from coming out into public. Presidents already have armed escorts, civil Service, around them to make sure they do not escape in public.

You guys didn't really think that those armed guards were there to protect the president did you? These are some of the biggest cons in the world.

originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: JinMI

The Dems don't follow through with their false allegations they like to just imply rape or impropriety without actually having to come up with proof. Usually making false claims is enough. See Julian Assange.

The woman in Assanges case hasnt withdrawn her complaint.

a reply to: rickymouse

President Harry S. Truman would agree with you. He once commented that the oval office was the crown jewel of the American penal system.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: rickymouse

President Harry S. Truman would agree with you. He once commented that the oval office was the crown jewel of the American penal system.

Many thanks, Xcathdra, for reminding us of that quote.

Now if only the criminals who have held the oval office (or desire to hold it) could be prosecuted and excoriated.

I am surprised theantediluvian and the usual trump haters didn't post this hours ago.

They seemed obsessed with this case and couldn't stop posting about it before.

Now they suddenly seem to have lost all interest.

originally posted by: Kapriti
a reply to: JinMI

So we can file this one under a repeat of "false allegations to destroy reputation" of someone who has angered the Controllers.

Now WJC's relationship to Epstein stands out far more boldly and disturbingly.

As I have been saying since the beginning this was just a fake lawsuit that was designed to stop Trump from bringing up Epstein in the campaign. If he brought it up Hillary could simply say oh you mean the same Jeffery Epstein whose party you were at when you had sex with a 13 year old.

These Clintons are as dirty as it gets and know all the tactics for keeping their crimes quiet. This does not surprise me at all.