Trump Child Rape Accuser to Speak Today

The woman suing Donald Trump for alleged child rape will speak publicly on Wednesday afternoon, her lawyer announced. The woman accuses Trump of raping her at a 1994 sex party when she was 13 years old. The party was allegedly at the home of Jeffrey Epstein, a sex offender who has pleaded guilty to soliciting sex from underage girls.

The woman will be making a public appearance with a new lawyer, Lisa Bloom, her law firm announced in a statement. (Bloom is the daughter of Gloria Allred, the high-powered feminist lawyer representing several of Trump’s sexual-harassment accusers.) They will make their appearance at 3 p.m. PT at the firm’s Los Angeles office.

The Daily Beast

Coincidently, she is deciding to speak just 6 days before the election. This looks more like a propaganda tool every day they try to make this accuser valid. By having an person accuse Trump of raping her at Epsteins house, they've eliminated the option for Trump to point out the obvious facts that Bill Clinton(and possibly Hillary) were deeply involved with Epstein.

Now, if this wasn't in the midst of an election I would give the accuser much more support. But this is all just too conveniently timed. I'd love to know how much coverage this has received from the MSM vs. Clintons ties to Epstein. The woman that was Epsteins recruiter has called Bill Clinton a "Good friend" as recently as a few years ago and was at Chelseas wedding, Ghislaine Maxwell.

If Trump makes a counter statement, I think we can expect him to go all in and expose WJC's escapades on Epsteins plane and island.

Either way, I look forward to hearing what the alleged victim has to say and I'll do so with an open mind.

Ghost

a reply to: ghostrager

I wonder if all those bemoaning Comey's announcement will bemoan this as potentially influencing the election?

Probably not.

I shared some of this on another thread but I'll share here as well. I have a background in litigation.

It is very, very, very, very easy for any Joe Blow off the street to file a civil lawsuit against anyone with deep pockets, regardless of how ridiculous the lawsuit is. And there are hardly ever any repercussions to the frivolous suer for doing so. It is very easy in this country to file a baseless lawsuit, either by finding a lawyer simply looking for dollar signs or if a lawyer won't touch it with a 10 foot pole, as your own pro se attorney.

Also, in rape-type cases, it almost always tends to be "he said-she said". And in civil cases, for the most part, you only have to prove a preponderance of the evidence in your favor i.e. 51% chance you are right. Throw in the fact that I don't believe there is a statute of limitations for filing civil child rape cases (could be wrong on this) so if you file it 20 years later who cares, and a need to seriously deflect away from Hillary's corruption, and you have a recipe for some home cooking here to try to influence the election.

There are only 2 possible options here. Either he really did rape her, or HRC is paying her a TON of money to make up this lie knowing very well that she likely won't face any consequences whatsoever if she loses a baseless lawsuit. The whole timing of this seems waaay too convenient for the first option.

Statue of limitations. Some states got rid of them on rape but I don't think the home was in those states. Even still, almost impossible to prove after 22 years. Should have told mommy when it happened instead of waiting until she was almost 40 and 6 days before an election holding a bucket for those crocodile tears.

What was a 13 year old doing at a"SexParty"?Where we're her parents,

Clinton's people must be seriously terrified to keep pulling these lame attempts.

Hope their site doesn't go down.
Internet has been really glitchy lately.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Clinton's people must be seriously terrified to keep pulling these lame attempts.

As are Trump's people with all the "Hillary is a lesbian pedophile taking advantage of a sex-trafficking ring with child sex slaves".

Up until now she went by "Jane Doe" and would never let her face be shown in the media.

I can't help but wonder how much they paid her to speak publicly now.

Well, what if, just what if she's not lying or paid by the Clinton's? Apparently Trump met this woman when she was 13 via a shared pedo billionaire friend of Bill Clinton's. You guys know who I'm talking about, he has the plane with the catchy name! Yes, that same man is also friends with your dear leader.

So if Bill is guilty by association with the pedo billionaire, according to conservatives, then so is Trump.

Guess we'll just have to wait until the trial is over. It begins in November and has been scheduled for some time now.

originally posted by: Swills
So if Bill is guilty by association with the pedo billionaire, according to conservatives, then so is Trump.

No, Bill is not guilty just by association. There are flight logs showing he boarded the Lolita Express 26 times.

Where are the flight logs showing Trump boarded Epstein's jet?

a reply to: BlueShaman

Trump has been that man's friend for years and years. Maybe you should read up on it.

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: BlueShaman

Trump has been that man's friend for years and years. Maybe you should read up on it.

Yes, I am aware of it.

Now produce the flight logs.

originally posted by: ghostrager
If Trump makes a counter statement, I think we can expect him to go all in and expose WJC's escapades on Epsteins plane and island.

Cant do that without incriminating himself.

"I should know, I was there doing the same thing" isn't really the best comeback

This case isnt new.. its been out almost a year so dont give me the "timing" B.S.

If you were raped as a kid.. were paid for it and held it in your whole life, and gotten passed it.. moved on...

Then you see.. 20 years later.. the man that did it on TV... possibly getting near the presidency.. dont you think It might make you want to do what you can to stop him? Even kf it means drumming up.repressed memories... to make sure evil doesnt prevail?

I really hate the "concienient timing" argument... the timing supports the act more than derails it. Yiu wouldnt want your rapist achieving the presidency

Well, now...

Rape lawsuits against Donald Trump linked to former TV producer

Lawsuits accusing Donald Trump of sexually assaulting a child in the 1990s appear to have been orchestrated by an eccentric anti-Trump campaigner with a record of making outlandish claims about celebrities.

Norm Lubow, a former producer on the Jerry Springer TV show, has previously been involved with disputed allegations that OJ Simpson bought illegal drugs on the day Simpson’s wife was murdered, and that Kurt Cobain’s widow had the Nirvana frontman killed.

Court filings in California and New York against Trump, purportedly on behalf of a woman using the name Katie Johnson, have in recent weeks alleged that the presumptive Republican presidential nominee raped Johnson when she was 13. Trump vehemently denies the allegations.

A publicist using the pseudonym “Al Taylor” is acting as a representative for Johnson, and has been shopping around to media outlets a video of a woman who wears a disguise while recounting the allegations against Trump. “Taylor” said in telephone calls last month that he was seeking $1m for the tape. Jezebel has published a segment of the video along with a detailed account of how the allegations against Trump were being pushed to reporters.

FULL ARTICLE:
www.theguardian.com...

Another Hillary well=paid shill in the same light as Khan....

a reply to: BlueShaman

Flight logs? What does that have to do with anything? So if no flight logs exist then Trump is totally innocent? What kind of logic is that? Trump supporter logic!

So you're aware Trump has been friends with a pedo for years and you don't hold it against him? Shocking! Now this woman is suing Trump for rape and it was that same pedo who introduced them and you don't hold it against Trump and not only that, you attack the rape victim. Deplorable!

a reply to: Swills

Guess we'll just have to wait until the trial is over. It begins in November and has been scheduled for some time now.

It hasn't even reached a trial phase yet, Swills.

What's happening in November is a judge is assigned to review the case and decide whether or not to proceed. Trump doesn't even have to be there.

Let's deflect deflect deflect from the Epstein/Bill connection and just focus on how someone claiming to be raped by Trump more than 20 years ago waited until now and 6 days before the election to come forward with her case.

originally posted by: TDawg61
What was a 13 year old doing at a"SexParty"?Where we're her parents,

I understand what you are saying but it's irrelevant in this case