It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JesusXst
a reply to: 3danimator2014
With all due respect, it does bother me when people 'mis label' me. A bit racist of you isn't it, to expect me not to speak out about this when there are other colored people speaking out for their heritage.
Or are the only ones allowed to speak out about their heritage those from the BLM movement and illegal immigrants? Then it's ok right?
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: JesusXst
Anglo-Saxon is an even less accurate way of describing whites though..
originally posted by: digital01anarchy
Additionally, we now know our species first appeared in Africa, so the biology isn’t any good either.
Lol the out of africa theory is a theory not proven fact. It is not racist. LOL pretty soon black history revisionist will say its racist that most of white population had colored eyes and blond hair and that in actuality it was always black people to have blue eyes and blond hair first.
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: JesusXst
a reply to: 3danimator2014
With all due respect, it does bother me when people 'mis label' me. A bit racist of you isn't it, to expect me not to speak out about this when there are other colored people speaking out for their heritage.
Or are the only ones allowed to speak out about their heritage those from the BLM movement and illegal immigrants? Then it's ok right?
Did I say ANYTHING about what you just mentioned? No. I didn't. But your whiny reply to me says it all.
Personally, I think it's ridiculous to be proud of something you had zero control or influence over, namely your skin colour and where you come from. And yes, I do think that about proud blacks too. Happy?
originally posted by: JesusXst
a reply to: TrueBrit
Those are good examples for anglo saxons
however i really hate being called a cock asian.
Nell Painter combines the discursive meanings of scholarship with the visual meaning of painting, to answer, literally, why white people are called 'Caucasian,' what that looks like, and how they all relate to our ideas about personal beauty. Series: "UC Berkeley Graduate Council Lectures" [Humanities]
originally posted by: odzeandennz
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: JesusXst
a reply to: 3danimator2014
With all due respect, it does bother me when people 'mis label' me. A bit racist of you isn't it, to expect me not to speak out about this when there are other colored people speaking out for their heritage.
Or are the only ones allowed to speak out about their heritage those from the BLM movement and illegal immigrants? Then it's ok right?
Did I say ANYTHING about what you just mentioned? No. I didn't. But your whiny reply to me says it all.
Personally, I think it's ridiculous to be proud of something you had zero control or influence over, namely your skin colour and where you come from. And yes, I do think that about proud blacks too. Happy?
its obvious this is what this thread was all about; it was never about lineage, or anthropology.
waaa
originally posted by: peskyhumans
originally posted by: digital01anarchy
Additionally, we now know our species first appeared in Africa, so the biology isn’t any good either.
Lol the out of africa theory is a theory not proven fact. It is not racist. LOL pretty soon black history revisionist will say its racist that most of white population had colored eyes and blond hair and that in actuality it was always black people to have blue eyes and blond hair first.
Blue eyes are a recessive trait, while brown eyes are a dominate trait. If one parent has blue eyes and the other has brown eyes, the child will have brown eyes. Whites are the only race with blue or green eyes. How can whites have originated in Africa when Africans don't have blue eyes? How does this explain whites having blue eyes?
The same with blonde and red hair. Whites are the only race with blonde and red hair.
You can't say it came from Neanderthal, because studies have shown that Asians also have Neanderthal DNA. Whites just have a slightly higher concentration of it. Yet the vast majority of Asians have black hair and brown eyes.
Yet most posters here will say I'm racist, or ignorant, or "aliens".
New research shows that people with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor. Scientists have tracked down a genetic mutation which took place 6,000-10,000 years ago and is the cause of the eye color of all blue-eyed humans alive on the planet today.
originally posted by: peskyhumans
a reply to: redhorse
That doesn't make any sense. If they can prove genetically that there is 1 ancestor where blue eyes originated, and that gene is recessive, then that 1 person mating with all the brown eyed people in the world would see his mutation vanish after only a few generations. The trait just wouldn't take off.
However if we assume that humanity originated in Europe, and that humans started with these recessive traits and then acquired more dominant traits (such as brown eyes) as they migrated elsewhere, the relatively large population of Europeans with blue eyes makes sense.