It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: bender151
a reply to: Greggers
You somehow believe those with the most resources will stick around if they're forced to pay more? That's the real foundation of trickle down economics, because without it there are zero jobs.
Trickle down economics doesn't work. When rich people get tax breaks, they have an opportunity to save it. Often, they do. When poor people get tax breaks, they dump it right back into the economy because they have to.
But that's neither here nor there.
Whether they will stay here is a question worth asking. It depends upon how their assets are tied up. Some things are easier to move than others. It also depends upon to what extent globalization has eroded our ability to prevent them from moving all their capital out of the country sans taxation, which of course is one of the reasons why the wealthy elite pushed for globalization to begin with.
Globalization allows the elite to move their capital freely without consequence without any regard for the welfare of those in the country where their money was earned.
So it might not be as easy as simply levying a new tax.
Unraveling 30 years or runaway power/money consolidation is harder than that.
I work for a multinational multi billion dollar company who pays for our insurance. Year before last, my insurance premiums went up as well as our plan. We paid a minimal flat fee and everything was taken care of. Last year, this changed. Now we pay a fee and 20% and a premium.
originally posted by: avgguy
a reply to: kruphix
I get insurance through my work and it's gone up a crazy amount in both my premiums and my max out of pocket.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: Greggers
ACA is accelerating us to THAT a reality.
THAT is why I wanted Carson.
I can BUT LAUGH if it happens, THEN you ALL can get screwed like VETS!
AND STILL PAY for it!
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: bender151
a reply to: Greggers
You somehow believe those with the most resources will stick around if they're forced to pay more? That's the real foundation of trickle down economics, because without it there are zero jobs.
Trickle down economics doesn't work. When rich people get tax breaks, they have an opportunity to save it. Often, they do. When poor people get tax breaks, they dump it right back into the economy because they have to.
But that's neither here nor there.
Whether they will stay here is a question worth asking. It depends upon how their assets are tied up. Some things are easier to move than others. It also depends upon to what extent globalization has eroded our ability to prevent them from moving all their capital out of the country sans taxation, which of course is one of the reasons why the wealthy elite pushed for globalization to begin with.
Globalization allows the elite to move their capital freely without consequence without any regard for the welfare of those in the country where their money was earned.
So it might not be as easy as simply levying a new tax.
Unraveling 30 years or runaway power/money consolidation is harder than that.
Trickle down doesn't work but either does taxing big businesses out the wazoo. They just pass the buck to the consumer and we all lose.
A little more equity is in order. That's all I'm saying.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: Mr Headshot
a reply to: kruphix
Kinda going to spin off that, but isn't it funny that that is the argument being made by the left now? The poor and disaffected who don't get the insurance through their work (basically the people who were invoked to pass the bill) are going to, now, take the brunt of the hikes.
Of course they will because they're the ones on the exchanges.
One thing Hillary would like to do is provide more federal funding to get younger people signed up, to lower the risk pool and in turn lower premiums.
Of course, the Republicans won't work with her on it because "OBAMACARE," so who knows.
I guess everyone is holding out for single payer, which is the inevitable result once the insurance industry collapses under the high cost of medical treatment.
yes, the young ones who are also making minimum wage or close. If they make any money at all, they will miss the subsidies and be paying the $500 to $800 a month the rest of us have to pay.
The way it was before Obamacare was much much better for everyone except the one's with pre-existing conditions.
It's a shame we couldn't have someone who was smart enough to grasp that. Then they could have just tried to fix that tiny slice of the population instead of jamming a broomstick up the rest of us.
originally posted by: StargateSG7
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: Mr Headshot
a reply to: kruphix
Kinda going to spin off that, but isn't it funny that that is the argument being made by the left now? The poor and disaffected who don't get the insurance through their work (basically the people who were invoked to pass the bill) are going to, now, take the brunt of the hikes.
Of course they will because they're the ones on the exchanges.
One thing Hillary would like to do is provide more federal funding to get younger people signed up, to lower the risk pool and in turn lower premiums.
Of course, the Republicans won't work with her on it because "OBAMACARE," so who knows.
I guess everyone is holding out for single payer, which is the inevitable result once the insurance industry collapses under the high cost of medical treatment.
yes, the young ones who are also making minimum wage or close. If they make any money at all, they will miss the subsidies and be paying the $500 to $800 a month the rest of us have to pay.
The way it was before Obamacare was much much better for everyone except the one's with pre-existing conditions.
It's a shame we couldn't have someone who was smart enough to grasp that. Then they could have just tried to fix that tiny slice of the population instead of jamming a broomstick up the rest of us.
===
The problem is out of 330 million people in the Unites States almost
133 million Americans or 45% of the population have AT LEAST ONE
chronic health condition which makes insurance for them automatically
nearly unaffordable. They are paying $300 to THOUSANDS of dollars a month
to manage the conditions either directly OUT OF POCKET or from Employer Insurance.
Of that 133 Million over 40 Million (CDC - Centre for Disease Control
and National Health Council statistics 2015) CANNOT get insurance
of ANY KIND because NO INSURANCE COMPANY will offer insurance
to them PERIOD !!!!!!
So 40 million IS NO SMALL SLICE so while Obamacare had the RIGHT INTENTION,
it's execution was a farce and a travesty because NO ability to negotiate prices
with drug providers or medical services companies was put into the legislation
due to GOP and Insurance Industry lobbying and pressure.
A single player system with BULK discounts and a SINGLE POINT of
computerized patient management is needed.
Up here in Vancouver, Canada where I live, as part of
Medicare (it's open to EVERYONE of not just those over 65!)
I have a single point of patient management! I can choose
ANY doctor to I want see or goto any hospital I desire
WITHOUT having to check if the doctor or hospital
is affiliated with a specific HMO plan or insurance policy!
So no matter where I am in the Province of British Columbia
(which is much larger in geographic size than Texas!), any doctor
or clinic can pull up my medical records and view it digitally
and any Xrays and imaging is sent digitally to anywhere needed!
My prescriptions are the same as I can got ANY pharmacy
IN CANADA to get any meds needed quick and fast.
It also means the GOVERNMENT has the negotiating power
to ensure good prices with drug manufacturers.
So instead of my dad paying an Amercian hospital bill
of $75,000 for two hip replacements, it only cost him
his normal Canadian monthly medicare premium of $120
or so and maybe $300 worth of non-covered items such
as a new multi-feature walker.
In the US, if you get Type-2 diabetes in your 40's
and work at a low-wage McJob at $11/hour,
in ten years or less you will be DEAD from the
glucose intolerance damage done to your body
(i.e. Kidney failure, nerve damage, and blindness)
because you CANNOT afford the $1000/month
for Insulin and Copays needed for Type-2 management!
No insurance company would cover you because
it would be considered a pre-existing condition.
Under Canada's single payer system,
you'd get insulation medication
and an education program
to manage your medical conditions.
Again, in the USA you will DIE!
So while it's your choice America,
it's sad to see that 290 million of you
are saying "Screw You" to 40 million
uninsured children and young or old workers!
originally posted by: drewlander
a reply to: Greggers
Not only I read it, I quoted it.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
A little more equity is in order. That's all I'm saying.
lol equity
is that what the dems call communism now ? Equity thats a laff riot!
originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: mobiusmale
Most people get their insurance through their work, the next largest segment has Medicare/Medicaid. Those that get their insurance through the exchanges, not all of them are experiencing a large premium hike.
The people you are talking about that are effected by these premium hikes are a small minority that won't tilt the election one way or another.
But go ahead and think this will change blue states to red.