It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: liammc
A scientific poll?
originally posted by: Greggers
When Trump loses, will you come back and acknowledge that scientifically conducted polls use reliable methodology, while Facebook polls have no statistical relevance?
Do you mean a complicated poll? There is no science needed in a #ing vote haha.
originally posted by: starlitestarbrite
Hillary Clinton is losing plain and simple I stated this before we work among the community in NE PA
there is no one voting for her out of at least 250 people that we know of in our area. This is odd because at least more then 75% of them have
voted democratic in the past ...PA has always been a liberal state ... theres a huge change where we live. This is a movement like no other and if you choose to deny it you are fools!
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: imjack
a reply to: Greggers
Who needs complicated science when you have Eternal Salvation in the Kingdom of Heaven?
Jesus 2016
You mean Cheetoh Jesus?
originally posted by: Rezlooper
You guys keep preaching about these "scientific" polls and that's the only thing we should believe.
originally posted by: Elepheagle
This thread (and all the crap like it, whether written, spoken) is why I've thrown up my hands, said **** it, and am voting for Clinton, who I detest with a passion. I simply can no longer placate the greater stupidity & ignorance, which is heavily concentrated on the Drumpf side.
Dear god, one doesn't even need to take a probability and statistics course to gain a basic understanding of how random sampling works. Confirmation bias, might want to look into that too.
This all said, we've got some soul-searching to do.