BREAKING: Early Voters Report Voting Machine Manipulation In Texas!

Buck

a reply to: BlueAjah

That's assuming an awful lot. I'm not even going to ask for a source.

There's just no end to the fraud, everywhere you look.



denver.cbslocal.com...

www.zerohedge.com...

Buck

a reply to: flatbush71

Oh the claims are there only the actual proof is not. Trump damaging our democratic process .
Awful.

originally posted by: Flatcoat

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Flatcoat

originally posted by: Sillyolme

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: shawmanfromny

The only way for old Hillary to win is to cheat, steal and add to the body count...

Or run against Donald Trump.

She couldn't have asked for an easier opponent.

Right....and she's still having a bloody hard time beating him.....

Yeah, I guess a 97 to 3% likely margin of victory is a "bloody hard time."

This gets more ridiculous by the post.

Link? ..Or are you just making stuff up....

What link would you believe?

Why would I waste time on posting a link only to have you say "oh, that's a biased poll."

So, what polls do you believe in?

originally posted by: shawmanfromny
a reply to: Gryphon66

OOPS, me bad. I made a mistake. I'm so sorry, I'm not a perfect know it all like you. I shouldn't of said "linked to" instead of "owned". Does that make your thin skin feel better bud?

Making mistakes is fine; I do it all the time.

Somehow I'm betting you don't learn from your mistakes, or, based on the remainder of what I've seen from you, oh freshly-minted ATSer, that you don't really care about the accuracy of what you post, as long as it fits your agenda.

Soros is not "linked" to Smartmatic except in the minds of right-wing believers.

Bud.

a reply to: shawmanfromny

I'm not your pal. Yes I read everything.
The opinions expressed in my posts are wholly my own.
Thank you for your inquiry.

originally posted by: flatbush71
There's just no end to the fraud, everywhere you look.



denver.cbslocal.com...

www.zerohedge.com...

Buck

Dead voters in a State database.

Are they voting? That would be voter fraud.

Folks showing up as registered in more than one state.

Are they voting in more than one state? That would be voter fraud.

originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: Gryphon66

Every time he loses a state, or it even appears he might lose a state, there will be a thread about it claiming voter fraud. Hey, it's all they've got. They do what they can to keep the drama going.

Yes.

Sadly, as is usual with right-wing/alt-right hysteria and dishonesty, the real important issues here are being diverted from and diffused by lies and ignorance.

There is an issue with electronic voting in this country; and it needs to be solved. However, using it to blame every Republican loss on is both pathetic and absurd.

All 11 accusations of voting machine manipulations in Texas were investigated by the State of Texas (a very red state) and all were dismissed as false accusations. NO wrong doing or errors were found.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Flatcoat

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Flatcoat

originally posted by: Sillyolme

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: shawmanfromny

The only way for old Hillary to win is to cheat, steal and add to the body count...

Or run against Donald Trump.

She couldn't have asked for an easier opponent.

Right....and she's still having a bloody hard time beating him.....

Yeah, I guess a 97 to 3% likely margin of victory is a "bloody hard time."

This gets more ridiculous by the post.

Link? ..Or are you just making stuff up....

What link would you believe?

Why would I waste time on posting a link only to have you say "oh, that's a biased poll."

So, what polls do you believe in?

So....you did make it up then.

originally posted by: Flatcoat

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Flatcoat

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Flatcoat

originally posted by: Sillyolme

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: shawmanfromny

The only way for old Hillary to win is to cheat, steal and add to the body count...

Or run against Donald Trump.

She couldn't have asked for an easier opponent.

Right....and she's still having a bloody hard time beating him.....

Yeah, I guess a 97 to 3% likely margin of victory is a "bloody hard time."

This gets more ridiculous by the post.

Link? ..Or are you just making stuff up....

What link would you believe?

Why would I waste time on posting a link only to have you say "oh, that's a biased poll."

So, what polls do you believe in?

So....you did make it up then.

Can't answer a simple question? Enough deflection.

Trump sycophants are notorious for picking and choosing what polls they will observe on what day.

ETA: &$%# it, I can answer and then I'll be done with you. There's a lot of different models that predict a wide margin between Clinton and Trump:

New York Times: Clinton 92%, Trump 8%

CNN Political Prediction Market Clinton 95%, Trump 5%

Nate Silver's Most Conservative Poll Aggregate Clinton 82.6% Trump 17.3%

So ... perhaps I was off by 2% in my sidebar this morning. The point is, Trump is losing BADLY.

Now, damn the sources, wave your fetishes, or whatever other foolishness suits you to prove that Trump is really winning; couldn't care less.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Following up on this, I ran across an interesting tweet:

me & my friends are wondering why a company that supplies 50% of voting machines 2 America donates $ to #ClintonFoundation

a reply to: usernameconspiracy

Issues with voting machines are enough to have doubts about legitimate results.

Nearly a year after Fairfax County scrapped its touch-screen voting machines, state officials are recommending decertification of the WinVote system used in 20 percent of Virginia’s precincts.

The investigation has raised concerns about the credibility and integrity of upcoming elections throughout the swing state.

Investigation casts cloud over Virginia voting machines

This one is from 2014, but it still is reported in various areas:

Illinois Republican state representative candidate Jim Moynihan went to the Schaumburg Public Library last Monday to vote for himself. “Instead, it cast the vote for my opponent,” Moynihan told Watchdog.org.

“Voting machines that switch Republican votes to Democrats are being reported in Maryland.

“When I first selected my candidate on the electronic machine, it would not put the ‘x’ on the candidate I chose — a Republican — but it would put the ‘x’ on the Democrat candidate above it,” Donna Hamilton said.
...
You could imagine my surprise as the same thing happened with a number of races when I tried to vote for a Republican and the machine registered a vote for a Democrat,” Moynihan said.

He notified the election judge at his polling place and demonstrated that it continued to cast a vote for the opposing candidate’s party. Moynihan was eventually allowed to vote for Republican candidates, including his own race.

‘Calibration issue’ pops up on Maryland voting machines

The same companies which supplied the voting machines for the troublesome 2000 presidential election are continuing to sell machines across the country.

Video: Florida’s voting machine curse continues

You can see the issues with various machines still in use here, and its VERY concerning:

(This one is used in my state)
www.verifiedvoting.org...

Misleading Activation When the Advantage is not activated to vote a valid ballot, it will still go through the motions in a way that will confuse voters into thinking that they ballot was cast. It even goes as far as to say, “Vote recorded — thank you!”, despite the fact that it couldn’t have recorded the ballot since it was not activated to do so.

(In addition to many other issues with these machines.)

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

That connection makes perfect sense.

The Delian Project's mission statement:

The Delian Project is a Non-Governmental Organization dedicated to helping jurisdictions implement positive change in the democratic voting process through the application of technology.

What the Clinton Foundation does:

The Clinton Foundation builds partnerships of great purpose between businesses, governments, NGOs, and individuals to work faster, better, and leaner; to find solutions that last; and to transform lives and communities from what they are today to what they can be, tomorrow.

Nothing nefarious there.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Following up on this, I ran across an interesting tweet:

me & my friends are wondering why a company that supplies 50% of voting machines 2 America donates $ to #ClintonFoundation

Wow, that is pretty interesting and somewhat worrying. You should get that information to the Trump campaign.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

That connection makes perfect sense.

The Delian Project's mission statement:

The Delian Project is a Non-Governmental Organization dedicated to helping jurisdictions implement positive change in the democratic voting process through the application of technology.

What the Clinton Foundation does:

The Clinton Foundation builds partnerships of great purpose between businesses, governments, NGOs, and individuals to work faster, better, and leaner; to find solutions that last; and to transform lives and communities from what they are today to what they can be, tomorrow.

Nothing nefarious there.

Thanks for your judgement on the matter - everyone can rest easy now.

For what it is worth, 600 in 22 states doesn't sound like 50%.

There 254 counties in Texas alone.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: eXia7

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Soros doesn't own US voting machines.

Period.

Hmm.. a billionaire who can manipulate all kinds of policy, groups, and governments, but can't have a stake in a company that provides voting machines.

#mindblown

Do you know George Soros personally?

If not, then your statement is not better than mine.

He doesn't.

I'm not talking about "could be" "might be" "I imagine that" ... I'm talking about REALITY.

George Soros doesn't own voting machines.

edit on 10/26/2016 by eXia7 because: (no reason given)

a reply to: Gryphon66

Yeah,like i'm going to intentionally break the T&C of a website where I hve been lurking for well over a decade and get a lot of my information from.IF this is a fake,see how easy it is to manipulate the process.