11th Woman Accuses Trump of Sexual Misconduct - Porn Star and Sex Educator

a reply to: windword

This is a true statement. Trump is being accused.
And for that statement I raise you a star.🙄

a reply to: windword

You already stated that you don't think it's prostitution which is why I asked you to clarify what prostitution is.

I'm sure the script for "c**t sucking sluts 7" was as brilliant as the first 6 which is why she couldn't turn down the part, but that still doesn't answer my question. Perhaps if I watch "Jessica Drake AKA Filthy Whore" that would clarify her position a little more. Maybe "Outdoor Hookers 8 & 9" could help, but then I'd probably have to watch the first 7 so I understand the story.

The title of that series of films you alluded to, would in the singular, apply nicely to another woman that is in the news a great deal right now, according to certain sources. a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

a reply to: Sillyolme

Or she is looking to promote her new website

Donald Trump’s latest sex accuser has launched her own online store to sell adult videos, toys, and sexual equipment. She announced the opening of the store one day before going public with her Trump allegations.

breitbart

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

I'm sure the script for "c**t sucking sluts 7" was as brilliant as the first 6 which is why she couldn't turn down the part, but that still doesn't answer my question. Perhaps if I watch "Jessica Drake AKA Filthy Whore" that would clarify her position a little more. Maybe "Outdoor Hookers 8 & 9" could help, but then I'd probably have to watch the first 7 so I understand the story.

You want to take a moral high ground, and say this woman has no right to expose Trump for breaking the law, disrespecting her right to say no, and believing that she was property that he could rent or purchase, because she did pornographic movies and educated people on sexuality.

a reply to: CulturalResilience

If that is the case, more power to her.

originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Sillyolme

Or she is looking to promote her new website

Donald Trump’s latest sex accuser has launched her own online store to sell adult videos, toys, and sexual equipment. She announced the opening of the store one day before going public with her Trump allegations.

breitbart

Anything except considering the possibility that Trump is a serial abuser, right?

This would be more funny if it weren't so sad.

a reply to: windword

No I don't. I never said that either.

I believe he sleazed on to her and gave her a job offer which she declined.

Anything except considering the possibility that Trump is a serial abuser, right?

This would be more funny if it weren't so sad.

11 women accuse him the month prior to the election? Seems legit....Keep those blinkers on, you have a race to win.

originally posted by: ghostrager

Anything except considering the possibility that Trump is a serial abuser, right?

This would be more funny if it weren't so sad.

11 women accuse him the month prior to the election? Seems legit....Keep those blinkers on, you have a race to win.

Blinders? That's funny coming from a Trump apologist.

These 11 women (and the more that will follow) aren't doing that much to alter the election, merely confirming what some have known all along.

originally posted by: windword

You want to take a moral high ground, and say this woman has no right to expose Trump for breaking the law, disrespecting her right to say no, and believing that she was property that he could rent or purchase, because she did pornographic movies and educated people on sexuality.

Let's break this down. Just to clarify my position here...

"You want to take a moral high ground, and say this woman has no right to expose Trump for breaking the law"
Illegal prostitution just makes the oldest profession a lot more dangerous so I don't consider that an issue as it's a silly law. Silly laws should be ignored.

"disrespecting her right to say no"
She didn't say no when he kissed her, only when he propositioned. And he respected her right to say no.

"and believing that she was property that he could rent or purchase, because she did pornographic movies and educated people on sexuality."
She isn't property, she's a person providing a service. A service that can be rented/purchased when a camera is rolling.
Would it be morally bankrupt to assume I could pay Judy Dench to read lines with me?

reminds me of an old joke.....

lets update it to make it current:

Trump asks a young lady...."Would you sleep with me for a million dollars?"

She says... "why of course...."

Trump asks the same young lady..."Would you sleep with me for 10 dollars?"

She says... "Hell No. What do you think I am?'

Trump says..."We have already established what you are... now we are negotiating a price."


Bada bing bada bang

These 11 women (and the more that will follow) aren't doing that much to alter the election, merely confirming what some have known all along.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Blinders are blinkers.

Your joking right? The allegations will continue through the election and have a massive effect on the election - they're about as setup as the protests at Trump rallies, and probably by the same people.

a reply to: ghostrager

Trump is an admitted germaphobe. He doesn't even like shaking hands.

These women will be sued like all the rest of them.

originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar
a reply to: windword

No I don't. I never said that either.

I believe he sleazed on to her and gave her a job offer which she declined.

A movie role would have been a job offer. Soliciting her for sexual favors in exchange for $10,000 is illegal.

a reply to: windword

I clarified my position on that already. Still waiting on your clarification.
Perhaps an apology for assuming I consider any woman who chooses what she does with her body as property wouldn't hurt either.

Its not something I would pay to watch.

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

I've made my position clear.

Trump broke the law when he solicited sexual favors in exchange for money. The porn star actress, on the other hand, broke no laws.

a reply to: windword

Not really, I asked for your definition of prostitution and you insulted me.

The only thing I can be clear on is that you don't think that considering women as property is a bad thing.
Otherwise you would have realised how insulting that was and apologised.

a reply to: windword

Actually I may owe you an apology.
Your signature suggests you are christian so you may not believe it to be as insulting as I do to regard women as chattel.

Apologies if that is the case, I don't want to insult your religious beliefs (not here anyway).