It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Encryptor
It would be worth putting some dollars on Trump.
If he wins, I win some extra bucks. If he loses we will all be vaporized by nuclear war anyway thanks to the insane satanic piece of filth, Hillary Clinton.
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: Encryptor
I passively want trump to win, i just don't believe he will
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Encryptor
It would be worth putting some dollars on Trump.
If he wins, I win some extra bucks. If he loses we will all be vaporized by nuclear war anyway thanks to the insane satanic piece of filth, Hillary Clinton.
Hey , Remember the 69 Mets ? 100 to 1 to Win the World Series that year . Anything is Possible .
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Encryptor
I used to be really big in sports gambling. Often times they make weird odds to confuse people, especially when they are afraid they are going to take a hit. Odds are to be taken with a grain of salt. They do know what they are doing, seeing as they're still in business. But the odds only mean something after the result.
originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: Encryptor
Problem is, you have to filter in the fraud from the dems plus the altered voting machines and those who dare to vote via internet. Otherwise, I am all in.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Encryptor
What I don't understand is how there can be such big differences amongst "experts" who have such a sterling track record of accuracy. Take for instance Nate Silver. He had Donald Trump winning back in August. Today, he has Hillary winning by a LANDSLIDE. Nate's chart movements are crazy up and down, for both candidates.
Ref: projects.fivethirtyeight.com...