Donald Trump refuses to say whether he'll accept election results

a reply to: Krazysh0t

AGAIN. He ALSO wasn't trying to disrupt the flow of government and tear it apart because he lost.

Who is suggesting to disrupt the flow of government and tear it apart ?

Funny how the first Clinton campaign was presided during one of our biggest economic gains in history as well as ended with a budget surplus, but yep they accomplished nothing. TOTALLY.

Bill Clinton helped seal Nafta and outsourcing which we the middle class is still paying for . He was president between 93-01 which allowed him to benefit from the dot com bubble .

That is like giving credit to Bush for the boom real estate market during his first term.

originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Who is suggesting to disrupt the flow of government and tear it apart ?

Trump. He can't accept that he is losing and blaming everyone but himself which is going a long way to tearing apart our government and will contribute to further government dysfunction after the election as people's biases prevent them from supporting anything Hillary decides to implement or push.

Bernie on the other hand knows that he can do more good by not breaking the system but working within it and changing minds. The peaceful way that we've always done it.

Bill Clinton helped seal Nafta and outsourcing which we the middle class is still paying for . He was president between 93-01 which allowed him to benefit from the dot com bubble .

That is like giving credit to Bush for the boom real estate market during his first term.

Ah I see. So if it is something that is good we can't give credit to the President for it, but if it's bad it's ALWAYS the President's fault. At least that's the narrative I see here on ATS, and you aren't doing a lot to dispel it here. Clearly this is an unwinnable argument for me if Bill can't take credit for the positive things that happened during his Presidency.

a reply to: kruphix

Finally, Trump said something I can agree with.

I think Trump figured he would be president and it would propel him to greater fame and power. Now he is realizing that a loss will hurt his ego and possibly his power status as well.

He will probably lose by a landslide and look like an idiot for not accepting the results of the election. I think that will keep his mouth shut.

a reply to: kruphix

He is the first Presidential Candidate to publicly refuse to say that he will accept the results of the election.

Thats the spin the media put on what he said. What he implied is h'ell wait and see the election results, not polls.

F*** the main stream media.

originally posted by: darkbake
He will probably lose by a landslide and look like an idiot for not accepting the results of the election. I think that will keep his mouth shut.

The electoral college system, read that the power structure, delegates and super delegates will back Hillary. The popular vote (the vote that no longer matters) will side with Trump. Not because Trump is a particularly good selection but people will vote for anyone besides Queen of Rome.

If any of you watched his speech or the highlights from today you would know why this is happening and why he said it.

If, in 1999, if Gore and Bush we asked to concede, and they agreed, there would not have been a hanging chad issue. In 2004. 'Ohio" was handed to Bush....remember? I do not remember that question that year....or any other for that matter.

So, if you step back and look at it, it is not like there is no fraud and anyone would be crazy to not reserve the right to question the election...as has happened many, many times.

High probability is that if he loses, he'll whine and claims fraud for 10 years, maybe the rest of his life. Trump always wins, he can't lose without losing face.

No surprise his daughter just stated her father would never lie to the American people. I guess she hasn't seen the tapes from the last few months. He's forgetting what lies he is telling.

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: iTruthSeeker
a reply to: kruphix

So he should roll over an accept a defeat based on fraud and corruption, knowing full well he is the one who really won?

And how would he know he really won?

You see, this is the issue...Trump and his supporters have already decided he won...so if he loses, it's rigged.

This is just crazy.

Today he clarified and said that he will accept the outcome - if he wins.

The dude is trying to turn a great tradition into a reality TV show. What a dufus.

He's an odd fellow. Why would he want to have it repeatedly jammed in his face that he lost by one of the largest margins in election history? Trump is going to be humiliated and he wants another taste of reality? Be my guest lol. Most decent folk wouldn't let a person like him sit at their dinner table let alone allow him to be America's leader. This whole website and it's Trump fanatics are going to be crying next month. Too bad it'll be all too real and there's nothing anyone here can do about it. All the conspiracy threads in the world won't matter when Hillary is elected president by a wide majority of voters. I'm not voting, but it's obvious what's happening here. The real question is, will Xenchuen still continue to add smiley faces to every post he makes after he realizes he spent endless hours posting about millions of Trump votes only to find out his entire reality is a lie. Hope he doesn't jump off a roof or something.

On the outside chance that Trump wins, maybe they should just refuse to swear him in as pres. and send him home.

It works both ways....

He can take his ball and go home. The oversized child. No one but a crazy ass 35% of voters care what this buffoon does anymore.

In the off chance that Trump wins that means the Democrats are free to call shenanigans, scream allegations of voter fraud, challenge the results with every legal means on the books and the right will just quietly sit on their hands for the whole show. Right?

originally posted by: iTruthSeeker
a reply to: kruphix

A look at the rallies, the internet, people in public, etc he is overwhelmingly wanted over her. It is clear who America "prefers".

Worked out real well for Ron Paul...

originally posted by: mobiusmale
a reply to: matafuchs

Right...and by the way, what was Hillary's response to this question?

Oh...that's right...she wasn't asked, and she wasn't required to answer if she would support Donald Trump when he is elected President.

If she had been, she would have had to choke on her own (lying) words to say the Politically expedient thing...that she would bow to him as POTUS - because she knows full well that (as Trump promised in the last debate), he will appoint a Special Prosecutor to look into her Private Server and the Clinton Foundation corruption. She will go from Presidential candidate to inmate if Trump is elected.

All of this false outrage is really quite astonishing!

Maybe she wasn't asked because she hasn't been going on record saying the election is rigged? Naw, that doesn't make any sense.

a reply to: kruphix

An odd question don't you think ??

Does the loser HAVE to accept it for it to go through ????

It is the most loser question a moderator can ask, do you ask anyone else in the world if they "Accept Losing".

LOL.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Trump. He can't accept that he is losing and blaming everyone but himself which is going a long way to tearing apart our government and will contribute to further government dysfunction after the election as people's biases prevent them from supporting anything Hillary decides to implement or push.

I think Trump is full of BS but so is that statement.
Trump , the Princeton Study, and Larry Lessig Harvard law professor pointing out that the System is corrupt is NOT tearing apart the gov't.

Its the right thing to do , so we can fix it versus acting like its all OK and let it keep getting worse as our politicians rob us blind and tack our freedoms away.

Ah I see. So if it is something that is good we can't give credit to the President for it, but if it's bad it's ALWAYS the President's fault.

Never said that , just stating that the dot com era had more todo with the economy blowing up than the POTUS. Unless ofcourse Bill helped Al Gore invent the internet.

a reply to: AceWombat04

A massacre ?

I starred your post but you are living terrified which I find amusing to say the least.

I do not think you are looking far enough, as to what is going to happen when a certain energy is released by scums such as these, they are going to be erased and something unprecedented will fill the void, the massacre will be directed to the ones who think they can never be destroyed.........

Trump answered this bait question exactly as he should have.

If he had said he would blindly accept the results, it would have given Dems a free ticket to commit fraud with the belief that Trump was going to keep his mouth shut and accept what he was dealt, just like good little soldier Sanders did when there was fraud against him in the primaries.

Now they know that Trump and his supporters are going to be watching closely, and are going to be questioning any signs of impropriety. At least it should keep election officials on alert that they had better be sure that everything goes smoothly and can be verified.

It is not like there has never been election fraud in this country. There were many problems with the 2016 primaries. Locations where exit polls showed that Bernie should have one were somehow far off from the election results. There were purged voter registrations, missing log books in areas where Bernie was a favorite, etc. But Bernie did not do anything about it.

That is how our new leaders want it. They want us all to shut up and bow down and play the game how we are told. We finally have someone standing up to that. We should be thanking Mr. Trump.

As Americans we have a right to question our government. When they start telling you to keep your mouth shut and accept the leaders they assign to you, then we become just another China. It's terrifying that Clinton is telling us that we have a duty to accept whatever happens without question.