HUGE Supporter Of Trump Donates 1.25 Million, Look What He Owns !

originally posted by: theantediluvian
Lol. This is the state of "conspiracy theory." Now you're fawning over the co-founder of a CIA funded big data company that services the entire intelligence apparatus and facilitates domestic spying.

The irony is just too much. Here let me "remind" you of something.

Here's The Secret Document That Banks And Other Big Organizations Are Using To Prepare For Wikileaks

You didn't know that Planatir was involved in a plot to take out WikiLeaks?

Here's one page from the leaked Planatir document:

Potential Proactive Tactics

Feed the fuel between the feuding groups. Disinformation. Create messages around actions to sabotage or discredit the opposing organization. Submit fake documents and then call out the error.

Create concern over the security of the infrastructure. Create exposure stories. If the process is believed to not be secure they are done.

Cyber attacks against the infrastructure to get data on document submitters. This would kill the project. Since the servers are now in Sweden and France putting a team together to get access is more straightforward.

Media campaignto push the radical and reckless nature of wikileaks activies. Sustained pressure. Does nothing for the fanatics, but creates concern and doubt amongst moderates.

Search for leaks. Use social media to profile and identify risky behavior of employees.

So, then wouldn't he have donated to Clinton? Not really sure what you're trying to prove, other than that OP is right and he has access to information that leads him to believe Trump will win. Seems like this is backfiring on you Ant.

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: CulturalResilience

originally posted by: underwerks
Another person fleeced by Trump. Color me surprised.

If the choice does turn out to be between a con artist or a murder sanctioning psychotic which do you think would be the best candidate? if you don't mind my asking.

Neither really. Depends on who the con artist and the murder sanctioning psychotic is I guess. If Trump was only a con artist, to me he wouldn't be different from any other candidate. The more volatile and arrogant a person is the easier they are to control by the people around them. One of the basic rules of power. And when you vote for Trump, you aren't voting for his ideas on anything, you're voting for the ideas of the advisors he surrounds himself with. That in itself makes him more dangerous than whatever kind of psychotic you believe Hillary is.

Thank you for the response. Are you saying you believe Hillary Clinton is less controlled than Trump?, (That would seem an odd stand point considering she was the one wearing an earpiece and using a teleprompter during the live debates.) and that the fact that she is less controlled makes her less dangerous?

originally posted by: CulturalResilience
Thank you for the response. Are you saying you believe Hillary Clinton is less controlled than Trump?, (That would seem an odd stand point considering she was the one wearing an earpiece and using a teleprompter during the live debates.) and that the fact that she is less controlled makes her less dangerous?

How on earth could she be using a teleprompter during the debates without Trump and his group even noticing? Ditto earpiece.

Who said Trump and his group never noticed? a reply to: Byrd

a reply to: CulturalResilience

Ok what this all about



twitter.com...

maybe planatir is the company the gets to rig the voting machines and vote counting for this election?

originally posted by: Trillium
a reply to: CulturalResilience

Ok what this all about

twitter.com...

How is this relevant to the question of whether Trump and his group did not notice that Clinton was using an earpiece and teleprompter?