It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nucleardoom
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: DrogoTheNorman
Uhhh not if hes endorsing a 3rd party or writing in a candidate.......
Trump supporters REALLY dont know how elections work do they?
They at least understand that even if hell freezes over those 3rd party candidates have no chance to win in the general election much less the electoral college.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
whats more sickening is that people on this thread are still droning on about Beck being a turn coat and selling out, even when its been proven that the OP isnt true....
Even when its proven that hes probably going to go third party......
Whats clear is that Trump supporters are so pissed off that he didnt fawn over Trump they just cant get the taste out of their mouths....
Whats clear is that it makes Beck look like an actual conservative rather then drinking the Trump Koolaid
Im sure they are very upset that he didnt sell out like Brietbart and Drudge did to Trump, yet they are calling him a sell out for not falling in line with Trump and the GOP
You Trump supporters sure have lost touch with reality and absolutely TWISTED what conservatism really is to fit into the voting booth of your Strongman Trump
Talk about selling out....thanks for propping up the two party system for another year
originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
What's clear is the fact that "Scary Trump" keeps you awake at night, and despite claiming to be against the two party system, you'll just bury your head in the pillow, or in this case a bowl of cheetos, and let the political mafia run rampant for another 4 years.
originally posted by: DrogoTheNorman
Show me a third party candidate who can win, and I will gladly vote for that person if he/she stops Hillary from being president.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: DrogoTheNorman
Show me a third party candidate who can win, and I will gladly vote for that person if he/she stops Hillary from being president.
That misses the point. Every time you vote third party, you give it more national exposure and higher polling. You also help it get matching funds and easier ballot access for the next election.
You could say that about anyone. Show me a person that can run a 4 minute mile. Show me a women who's going to get the right to vote. Show me a leader that will stop British rule in India. Show me a minority leader that can help get anti discrimination laws passed. Show me a president that can help end Slavery. Etc.
It has to start somewhere.
originally posted by: DrogoTheNorman
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: DrogoTheNorman
Show me a third party candidate who can win, and I will gladly vote for that person if he/she stops Hillary from being president.
That misses the point. Every time you vote third party, you give it more national exposure and higher polling. You also help it get matching funds and easier ballot access for the next election.
You could say that about anyone. Show me a person that can run a 4 minute mile. Show me a women who's going to get the right to vote. Show me a leader that will stop British rule in India. Show me a minority leader that can help get anti discrimination laws passed. Show me a president that can help end Slavery. Etc.
It has to start somewhere.
For me, it will have to start with the poll numbers.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
What's clear is the fact that "Scary Trump" keeps you awake at night, and despite claiming to be against the two party system, you'll just bury your head in the pillow, or in this case a bowl of cheetos, and let the political mafia run rampant for another 4 years.
That's why voting third party is so important, it stops the two party Mafia in it's tracks, yes?
I personally will have to swallow hard to vote for him in November, but the prospect of Hillary Clinton appointing SCOTUS judges who could vote that the Second Amendment is not an individual right will get me to vote for him.
I Am Neither Endorsing Nor Voting for Hillary Clinton By Glenn Updated 10/11/2016 | 3:50 PM EDT Share This Tweet This It has been widely reported I am either endorsing or voting for Hillary Clinton as president, and I stated that voting for Hillary is the ‘the moral and ethical’ choice. Let me be clear (and thankfully this is an easy one to dispel): None of this is true. I am firmly against both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton as potential presidents of the United States of America. I believe that neither candidate has the values, decency or principles to be the leader of the free world. And for the millionth time (though I presume not the last), I reject the notion of a binary choice. I will not vote for the ‘lesser of two evils.’ My Facebook post included in these reports is very clear: If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice. The ‘moral, ethical’ reference is not directed towards Hilllary Clinton, but rather my decision to stand for and on my principles against the candidacy of Donald Trump. If other people share this principle and hence, Clinton is elected, at least my choice of sticking to my principles is, to me, moral and ethical. Any attempt at putting words in my mouth or distorting this very clear statement is unfortunate and yet, not surprising. I challenge any objective reader to read my statement and come to a different conclusion. Because of my appearance last night on VICE News Tonight, what I said was conflated to make it seem like I was endorsing someone who I have opposed for nearly 30 years. On VICE, I was asked if I considered voting for Hillary Clinton. I said that I had. I also said (which was included in the clip) that I could never vote for her. As someone who believes that Donald Trump is wholly unfit for office, I have considered every alternative to his candidacy. I admit, I spent a moment thinking that if it is a binary choice as everyone claims, and I will not support Donald Trump, does that mean I should vote for Hillary Clinton? But my conclusion (that took me very little time – think nano seconds) was that voting for Hillary would still be in the camp of voting for the ‘lesser of two evils.’ And frankly, I don’t know who will be worse for our country or for conservatism (whatever that word means today). Neither candidate is even close to what I expect and, as a citizen, demand from our leadership. I am not endorsing anyone in this presidential cycle. If the election were today, I would vote for Darrell Castle of the Constitution Party – BUT – that is a) Not an endorsement and b) Subject to change.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
a reply to: DrogoTheNorman
Uhhh not if hes endorsing a 3rd party or writing in a candidate.......
Trump supporters REALLY dont know how elections work do they?
originally posted by: Nucleardoom
They at least understand that even if hell freezes over those 3rd party candidates have no chance to win in the general election much less the electoral college.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
Doesnt matter, you still vote for whoever you have the most confidence in to win, if neither of those are of the two party system you go third party......
Your line of thinking is exactly why the two party system reigns supreme....
No one can fault Beck or anyone else for doing this
originally posted by: introvert
Opposing Trump does not mean he endorses Clinton. He could be voting for Johnson.
originally posted by: DrogoTheNorman
Full disclosure: my purpose for starting this thread was not to prop up Trump, but to send a wake up call to conservatives who support Glenn Beck that maybe he is not the true conservative he claims to be.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
But even your pro-trump article there doesn't have Beck endorsing Clinton. It looks like he is just saying "Don't vote for Trump and we'll just have to cut our losses if Clinton wins." Maybe that's because Beck has pulled back far enough away from the conspiracy theory abyss to remember that there will be another election 4 years from now where the Republicans can try again to get the White House.
originally posted by: DrogoTheNorman
The bottom line is: How could a self-proclaimed conservative like Glenn Beck give any kind of positive reinforcement to the idea of voting for Hillary Clinton, who would be worse than Obama as far as advancing a left-wing agenda?