Trump easily wins 2nd debate MSM trying to spin it against him.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Oh. I didn't know it was his daughter.

Perhaps you should take heed that if you didn't know that, you probably don't know enough other things to make a judgment about anything, or to advise anyone else.

Do your homework, "Doctor," before unleashing your phalanges in the vicinity of your keyboard.

Maybe you should do a little homework on this before you vote for your own demise.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Thanks, but --- I'm all caught up. And I've never said I was voting for her. I will say, however, that I will never vote for that madman.


(see below for visual)

I'm voting for Trump. I believe Trump is on the United States side and will not undermine US citizens. Plus he won't screw other countries over as well. The world will be a better place.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

I'm voting for Trump. I believe Trump is on the United States side and will not undermine US citizens. Plus he won't screw other countries over as well. The world will be a better place.

sad

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Doctor Smith

I'm voting for Trump. I believe Trump is on the United States side and will not undermine US citizens. Plus he won't screw other countries over as well. The world will be a better place.

sad

what's wrong with you? Why are you sad?

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Because she votes with her emotions, and not facts.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Doctor Smith

I'm voting for Trump. I believe Trump is on the United States side and will not undermine US citizens. Plus he won't screw other countries over as well. The world will be a better place.

sad

I agree.

I still don't get how anyone can vote for Trump.

I don't know if it's just me but Trump keeps sniffing like his nose has broken down through overuse of certain white powders.

He's almost painful to watch.

originally posted by: studio500
I don't know if it's just me but Trump keeps sniffing like his nose has broken down through overuse of certain white powders.

He's almost painful to watch.

That's what it looks like to me as well....

a reply to: olaru12

a reply to: Doctor Smith

I'm sad that there are so many imbeciles in this country. I'm sad that my kids have a future that looks so bleak. I'm sad that I might never get to enjoy grandkids. I'm sad that my mother is depressed and hopeless over this disaster - this debacle - this absolutely dismal surreality that people are calling an "election."

I'm sad that Bernie isn't on that stage, and that Trump is allowed out of his "tower," when he should be in an asylum.

I'm sad that a fourth grader could do a better job. Hell - a goldfish...a goldfish could do a better job than Trump would do.

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

Don't be sad. Just remember to vote on November 28th.

I support Trump. But the second debate was 50/50. I had had to pick a winner. I would say trump. But no one did really great or really bad. I think he should skip the next one. Not a lot to win or lose. Not many people watched second debate.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

The purpose of a debate is to make a better argument while sticking to the truth. Fact checking afterwards shows that almost no truth came out of Trump. To lie in a debate is essentially cheating and if you have to cheat to make your point, you've lost the debate.

I understand that you want to keep the Trump momentum going, but if he can't be trusted to tell the truth for most of the issues in a debate, then why would he deserve to be president?

Sure, Hillary has her own set of baggage, but for the most part, she kept to the facts. She could have said nothing and that would have won her the debate.

a reply to: Phage


Mishandling classified documents.

www.fbi.gov... -a-personal-e-mail-system

"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

www.law.cornell.edu...

Under US Code He admitted she was guilty of this. As for what punishment that would up to the prosecutor, but saying no prosecution? Under standard rules it would have been a slam dunk case. Also under the rules; the most that would probably have happened is she would of lost her clearance.

a reply to: grahag

The purpose of a debate is to make a better argument while sticking to the truth. Fact checking afterwards shows that almost no truth came out of Trump. To lie in a debate is essentially cheating and if you have to cheat to make your point, you've lost the debate.

And HRC lied all night. She said she did nothing wrong with the emails or example. She lost big. The sad thing is her indoctrinated unwitting victims will just vote for her, no matter what the facts. They'll go into denial and be robbed blind.

a reply to: dismanrc

Whoever knowingly and willfully...

www.law.cornell.edu...