Trump easily wins 2nd debate MSM trying to spin it against him.

Clinton rape victim post debate getting YUGE media coverage on Clinton assaults This is going to crush Clinton, mark my words. I actually feel sick.

Before you get all excited about Kathleen Willey ("I actually feel sick" — yeaaaah sure you do), you might actually want to do a little homework. According to Linda Tripp, Willey sought out an affair with Clinton and was "excited" after their alleged encounter.

Kathleen Willey got busted lying to investigators and was forced to admit that she'd lied and so her testimony was left out of the final report.

She wrote several letters to Clinton afterward, including letters where she was trying to get a meeting with him. That was all published.

So her story was pretty much blown out of the water completely. Now with GOP harpy Paula Jones, she tries to make a living off of Clinton bashing. Which is why she wrote a book that was published in 2007 by WND, just in time for that election.

Oh and did I mention that Donald Trump is paying her? That's according to Roger Stone back in May.

So don't get yourself too fake sick over it.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Wardaddy454

So you did not say

Yes. I said I watched the whole thing even though I had to pee.

So I said maybe it was a really long pee, and you said that I missed the part where you didn't take a pee.

I guess this depends (ha) on what your definition of pee is?

Having to pee can be very distracting.

Back teeth start to float and one can miss a conversation trying not to think about waterfalls.

I don't think CNN brought Anderson Cooper up to the "spin room" to have post-debate analysis with Wulf Blister tonight.

originally posted by: theantediluvian

Clinton rape victim post debate getting YUGE media coverage on Clinton assaults This is going to crush Clinton, mark my words. I actually feel sick.

Before you get all excited about Kathleen Willey ("I actually feel sick" — yeaaaah sure you do), you might actually want to do a little homework. According to Linda Tripp, Willey sought out an affair with Clinton and was "excited" after their alleged encounter.

Kathleen Willey got busted lying to investigators and was forced to admit that she'd lied and so her testimony was left out of the final report.

She wrote several letters to Clinton afterward, including letters where she was trying to get a meeting with him. That was all published.

So her story was pretty much blown out of the water completely. Now with GOP harpy Paula Jones, she tries to make a living off of Clinton bashing. Which is why she wrote a book that was published in 2007 by WND, just in time for that election.

Oh and did I mention that Donald Trump is paying her? That's according to Roger Stone back in May.

So don't get yourself too fake sick over it.

But even if that is all true there are still several questions.

First, the main stream media has no problem making excuses in other cases when it turns out that the alleged victims change testimony or continue to hang out with attackers, yet the are silent on this. They attacked cosby (rightfully so) and gave his accusers a serious platform even after many of them were silent for years and changed stories.

They stuck with the Dukde lacrosse story when it started to go to shambles, and the UVA rape story. I wasn't until is was proven without a shadow of a doubt that these were hoaxes that they let the story go.

And thats brings us to the next point. Even when these stories were admitted hoaxers, many on the left and the main stream media were quick to say we still shouldn't go after the alleged victims. That would be wrong.

yet that is exactly what Hillary did. She hired private investigators to dig in these womens lives, and to harrass and intimidate them. She said vile things about them.

Now anyone could understand Hillary being mad at these women, but to go that far seems ridiculous. Now why is the media silent on this when in every other case they are quick to decry any victim shaming?

rather or not these women were raped by Bill seems unimportant to the issue of electing Hillary. The issue that matters is how did Hillary treat these alleged victims? She attacked them in a manner that the MSM and dems usually would shout down, and yet Hillary gets a pass.

a reply to: FrontRunner

Honest question. You want Hillary as president?

No.

Donald Trump goes from receiving "last rites" on Friday to being removed from Life Support by Sunday evening.

RE: www.politico.com...

"Swing-state Republicans are breathing a sigh of relief, convinced that embattled GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump successfully took the fight to Hillary Clinton in Sunday night’s acrimonious town-hall debate."

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: jhn7537

And Trump has settled lawsuit for groping and a lawsuit right now for allegedly raping a 13 year-old girl at three of Epstein's parties.

How many 13 year-old girls is Clinton alleged to have raped? I mean, if you want to do the whole tit-for-tat thing.

That's the latest scam of the Clinton's. Bill Clinton is the one known to hang out with Epstein on pedophile island . Now Epstein has immunity along with unidentified witnesses who are now going to slander Trump, right before the election. No charges will be filed and it will be dropped after the election. Will be interesting to see if this will backfire on the Clinton's.

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: jhn7537

And Trump has settled lawsuit for groping and a lawsuit right now for allegedly raping a 13 year-old girl at three of Epstein's parties.

How many 13 year-old girls is Clinton alleged to have raped? I mean, if you want to do the whole tit-for-tat thing.

Groping and rape are not apples to apples, and if information is presented showing Trump did in fact rape a 13 year old girl, I would hope some form of instant karma would come back his way.

I just don't understand why you Hillary supporters seem to treat Bill and Hillary separate? They are married, they've been together for decades, and if you elect Hillary, that means you're putting a former President who was essentially impeached back into the White House, not to mention a former President who seems to have loads of skeletons in his closet... I want Hillary to answer on these claims, because it's her husband and she should either accept or deny the claims against her husband.... It speaks to her character that she stayed with this sick man if the claims against him are in fact true.. I dont want that lady running this country, just like how I wouldn't want Trump running it if the claims he raped a young child are true as well.

a reply to: carewemust

From your link:

Three quarters of GOP insiders said Trump did the better job on Sunday night, but more than nine-in-10 Democrats said Clinton was the winner.

Oh, dear.

originally posted by: Willtell

I was waiting for him to grab Hillary's breast or P___y

I find myself saying this just about every time I make a point about one side or the other, just so I'm not accused of being a Hillarite or, in this case a Trumper, that being said...

I see so many Hillarites repeating this, if you really expected Trump to make an inappropriate grab for Clinton then you are a complete idiot of staggering proportions. If you don't actually believe he would do that, don't say it, you'll save face thar way.

Now you can go on about arguing which of your potential Candidates will FAQ the World up the least, (that is what you're doing, all I hear is, "I'm coming for Hillary because Donald Trump..." or "I'm voting for Donald because Hillary Clinton..."), this whole mess makes me weep for humanity, if you are voting Trump or Clinton then you should hang your head and be thoroughly ashamed of yourself...

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Doctor Smith

I agree he won, but he won the same way a foul child wins an argument against their parent. He didn't have substance instead he was simply more vicious and obstinant. While he didn't have any policies her policies were lacking in every regard.

The whole thing was shameful to the extreme and it wasn't just him it was both of them. I am certain that it did very little to sway needed voters for either side. I came away from it despising both of them far more than I ever thought I could.

The next 4 years we are destined to be under the worst presidential administration in US history regardless of which of them win.

Actually Luntz focus group moved toward trump. A lot.
Pre debate it was
Hillary: 8
Trump : 9

Post debate it was

Hillary: 3
Trump: 14

a reply to: Dfairlite

What is the sampling method?

a reply to: Phage



Ummm...wow dude...why are you trolling so hard...?

It's really pathetic...I had more respect for you...but it's like your character assassinating yourself...and that particular version of self flagelation is never pretty...

It's painful to watch...in a vicarious kind of way...




YouSir

Wow! Trump pulled it off. If he can do that for one more debate and keep himself from stepping on his own toes...he will have done the best he possibly could.

I'm impressed

originally posted by: Phage
Cool. He's going to circumvent the legal system and jail Hillary.

Awesome.

Who else?

Your a fool if you think the DOJ even remotely served justice towards Clinton.

It was a complete white wash from top to bottom and you're going to fault Trump

for trying to have someone actually investigate this? Sad.

It seems to me from England that your media (and ours actually) want Hillary to win and are skewed towards her.

I'd imagine that they therefore skewed the audience to have more Hillary supporters than Trump supporters, since if people at home hear the majority of the audience applauding HC and booing DT, then subconsciously those who follow the herd will vote HC.

So it surprised me when DT made that comment about "you'd be in jail" - just how loud the audience cheered. The referee had to tell the audience to stop cheering from then on.

Maybe people generally are just sick of the system and people like HC obviously doing sh*tty things and just getting away with it over and over again.

I think it's like the Brexit vote here, when there is so much ill feeling from ordinary people, when they feel like they aren't being listened to or are being treated unfairly they protest by voting against the system.

HC is 100% system so I think Trump is going to appeal to a lot more people than most think he will.

I expect he'll increase the attacks focusing on Crooked Hillary and her misdeeds, and I think it will work for him.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Grambler

But Hillary is admitting to our face that she lies to the public.

Where?

Wow. You said you watched the debate, but did you have the audio on?

Hillary admitted she had a public stance and a different private stance. Two faced. She compared herself to Abe Lincoln using two different arguments for two different political groups.

She also admitted that her bad handling of classified information was a mistake and she said she was "sorry". She should go to jail based on that alone, nevermind intent.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Dfairlite

What is the sampling method?

17 people. Duh.

Selected at random from a Trump viewing rally.

a reply to: Phage

No he said she will be investigated? Then said if I was president you would be in jail. You came up with that assumption.

Trump should win any debate by default. The leak that Clinton has a fake public policy and a real behind closed doors policy should make anything she says in these irrelevant.