It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RedMenace16
Good, thank you bush for exposing to millions what a lot of us already knew.
Trump is not only a racist coward, a con artist traitor and fraud, a serial liar and a tax evader, but he's also a pedophile and rapist. I wouldn't let my kids and specially daughter around this disgusting perverted disgrace of a human being.
Low energy Jeb Bush just endorsed a man he truly hates, Lyin’ Ted Cruz. Honestly, I can’t blame Jeb in that I drove him into oblivion! - Donnie Trump
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
originally posted by: aethertek
a reply to: Zanti Misfit
The " Free Love " Bunch all of a sudden have become Puritans . Talk about Transparency ..........
& talk about failing to understand the difference between consensual relations & sexual assault.
K~
Where was a Sexual Assault Committed ? You sure do like making accusations against Mr. Trump , but Fail to Offer any Conclusive Evidence to Any of them . Did you even View the Video ? Mr. Trump talks , did you see any Molesting in it ? GTFOOH......
originally posted by: ghostrager
Possibly Assange. Rumor has it that some future Wikileaks might blow the lid on major election rigging since George W Bush. Supposedly they include collusion of all major media outlets, both parties, rigged polls, fraud, etc.
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
For this theory to be true, it means they've been sitting on these tapes for the last 10+ years.
If so, why didn't they release them when Jeb was running against Trump? It would've made a lot more sense then.
A Rothschild came out against Trump too
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: audubon
Whether Poppy Bush would really vote for Clinton or not is sort of beside the point. He announced he would do so in order to signal to Republicans (mainly of his own generation, but not exclusively) that Trump must not win in the name of his party.
If Trump wins under the GOP brand label, it will be the end of the GOP as we know it. Some might say that would be a good thing, but that's not how it looks to the grandees and grey eminences of the right. Whether or not the party could reformulate itself after a Trump presidency is neither here nor there as far as they are concerned. (And it would survive and adapt -- the Republicans freed the slaves, the Democrats were the party associated with deep southern racists as recently as 50 years ago).
Whatever else one might think about Trump, he is a threat to the Republican power structure.
No!
Trump is a threat to the elites plan of a NWO. The UN has came out against Trump, China has came out against Trump, and FYI? China has already been primed for their Yuan to take over as the dominate currency as soon as the elite like Soros has admitted to slowly declining the value of the dollar!
If you are a US citizen are you looking forward to living in a 3rd world country? Because that is what it is all about!
You do realize that if Hillary get in the effect it will have on the Constitution by her appointing more Marxist judges to the Supreme Court?
originally posted by: Swills
It was a Bush who brought him down and his first name is Billy, no relation to George (AFAIK).
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
With all this back and forth rhetoric, I've yet to see a post that analyzes the big picture here.
Trump has just as many if not more supporters than Hillary.
The party he's associated with does not want him representing them to the point that they're helping his opponent succeed.
Thus, by trying to disqualify Trump the Republican party is essentially saying to half of the voters "We don't care who you want, our interests come first."
And somehow this is democracy? Why even pretend anymore?
originally posted by: ssenerawa
A Rothschild came out against Trump too
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: audubon
Whether Poppy Bush would really vote for Clinton or not is sort of beside the point. He announced he would do so in order to signal to Republicans (mainly of his own generation, but not exclusively) that Trump must not win in the name of his party.
If Trump wins under the GOP brand label, it will be the end of the GOP as we know it. Some might say that would be a good thing, but that's not how it looks to the grandees and grey eminences of the right. Whether or not the party could reformulate itself after a Trump presidency is neither here nor there as far as they are concerned. (And it would survive and adapt -- the Republicans freed the slaves, the Democrats were the party associated with deep southern racists as recently as 50 years ago).
Whatever else one might think about Trump, he is a threat to the Republican power structure.
No!
Trump is a threat to the elites plan of a NWO. The UN has came out against Trump, China has came out against Trump, and FYI? China has already been primed for their Yuan to take over as the dominate currency as soon as the elite like Soros has admitted to slowly declining the value of the dollar!
If you are a US citizen are you looking forward to living in a 3rd world country? Because that is what it is all about!
You do realize that if Hillary get in the effect it will have on the Constitution by her appointing more Marxist judges to the Supreme Court?
Mr. Trump talks
It was a Bush who brought him down and his first name is Billy, no relation to George (AFAIK).
Do you guys really believe if Trump was dumped they'd put Jeb up? Lmao!
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
With all this back and forth rhetoric, I've yet to see a post that analyzes the big picture here.
Trump has just as many if not more supporters than Hillary.
The party he's associated with does not want him representing them to the point that they're helping his opponent succeed.
Thus, by trying to disqualify Trump the Republican party is essentially saying to half of the voters "We don't care who you want, our interests come first."
And somehow this is democracy? Why even pretend anymore?
And that would likely elicit a collective yawn and a channel change. I don't think it would come as a big shock to anyone, and there isn't much to be done about it now. 3 months after the next degenerate is inaugurated, everyone will be on to something else. Gay wedding cakes or anthem kneelers or Confederate flags or something.