It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: Vasa Croe
It's pretty simple though. What different perspective is needed? When Mr White and Mr Black leave the house the odds are 3 times greater that Mr Black won't come home compared to Mr White. Simple.
I don't recall anyone specifying certain cops....seems they want them all gone.
originally posted by: searcherfortruth
originally posted by: searcherfortruth
Kneeling - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Kneeling is a basic human position where one or both knees touch the ground. It is used as a resting position, during childbirth and as an expression of reverence and submission. It is possible to kneel with one leg and assume another position (such as squatting) with the other leg.
They kneel for Royalty, they kneel for the Pope, they kneel to pray, so why is kneeling for the National Anthem a sign of disrespect? Is it actually a law that we must stand for it? No. I think this whole broohaha over these people kneeling is ridiculous.
No where did I mention anything about color or cops, I pointed out something that has been completely overlooked. Kneeling regardless of the intention is NOT a show of disrespect. If you take the literal translation of the definition it is simply a submissive sign of respect. And no where is it written that a person can not kneel during the National Anthem and still respect the flag or country.
He may have done it in protest, but he, also, did what was his right to do, freedom of speech does not stop at the locker room door and last I looked that is a protected right under the Constitution, or does that just get selectively applied when it suits ones purpose, like the right to bear arms?
You say there are more important issues to focus on and guess what you may be right, the stupid debates and political nonsense? How about global warming and chemtrails? Sure I guess the killing of innocent people with their arms in the air is not really all that important, dropping bombs on innocent civilians certainly is a bigger issue, but not many people care about that either, and guess what I bet those people that were killed in the Middle East this past 30 years were all kneeling when they said goodbye.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Your original statement appears to be talking about more people than just Kaepernick though.
I don't recall anyone specifying certain cops....seems they want them all gone.
You don't tend to use those bolded pronouns when talking about just one guy.
Either way....let me know which specific countrymen I should be getting on to for oppressing blacks as the statement made was "entire country".
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Well I SPECIFICALLY quoted the post I was responding to, so why would you assume I was talking about a different post?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Vasa Croe
My POINT was that you are lumping all with the few based on one guy's opinion, and you are presuming to speak for a group (negatively and biased against them I might add) that you don't represent.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
I'm kind of disappointed the media is giving this guy so much attention. Let him kneel, and move on.
In purely unrelated news NFL ratings are taking a pretty sizable hit this year.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Vasa Croe
My POINT was that you are lumping all with the few based on one guy's opinion, and you are presuming to speak for a group (negatively and biased against them I might add) that you don't represent.
Ah...got it now. So let them lump all police together and because I'm white I shouldn't speak. Understood.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Vasa Croe
My POINT was that you are lumping all with the few based on one guy's opinion, and you are presuming to speak for a group (negatively and biased against them I might add) that you don't represent.
Ah...got it now. So let them lump all police together and because I'm white I shouldn't speak. Understood.
Now you are speaking for me. Where did I mention your skin color?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Vasa Croe
So the only group other than "black" is "white" in your book? Interesting...
Anywho...carry on with the bias.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Anywho...carry on with the bias.
Says the person who just got called out for several strawmans, speaking for another group, AND for speaking for the person she was speaking to. Though I don't expect you to admit your wrongness. So don't worry you can smugly pretend you were right. I don't care.