Useless SJW gives the finger to the wrong dude.

originally posted by: Bobaganoosh
a reply to: InTheLight

This is not the only message board with this story. Though, this thread is by far the most objective and accurate.

You also keep coming back to my "mislabeling" her as a "useless SJW", but that label too is accurate. If you will look at the comments on various sites running this video, you will see actual SJW's begging her to drop it and move on. The Tararist is a real martyr without a cause, as in the realm of public opinion, almost nobody wishes for her support. Nobody is buying her vicarious suffering.

Nobody will hire her. She is indeed useless. Her toxicity is recognized even by those she claims as allies.

Your point is moot.

The label is only accurate to you as you made it up from your beliefs and not facts. But, you are right, my points are moot here, not because they are incorrect, just because you believe they are incorrect.

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: Bobaganoosh
a reply to: InTheLight

This is not the only message board with this story. Though, this thread is by far the most objective and accurate.

You also keep coming back to my "mislabeling" her as a "useless SJW", but that label too is accurate. If you will look at the comments on various sites running this video, you will see actual SJW's begging her to drop it and move on. The Tararist is a real martyr without a cause, as in the realm of public opinion, almost nobody wishes for her support. Nobody is buying her vicarious suffering.

Nobody will hire her. She is indeed useless. Her toxicity is recognized even by those she claims as allies.

Your point is moot.

The label is only accurate to you as you made it up from your beliefs and not facts. But, you are right, my points are moot here, not because they are incorrect, just because you believe they are incorrect.

You argue, but you don't provide any facts or evidence to back up your position, which I may say is weak and has nothing to do about politics.

I just read the most recent comments on that xojane article she wrote. Almost no one is supporting her, not even the insufferable third wave feminists of xojane.... Quite telling

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: EvillerBob

originally posted by: InTheLight
a reply to: Bobaganoosh

You have already judged her without a trial, and a non-compassionate one at that.

She put the victim on trial in the worst possible way - in a court of opinion where she is the prosecutor AND the judge, and the only person allowed to adduce evidence or make arguments.

If that is true, then she is doing what all of you are doing here...kettle/pot.

What people often forget about that saying is that, yes, the pot may be calling the kettle black, but the pot is still absolutely correct.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: Bobaganoosh
a reply to: InTheLight

This is not the only message board with this story. Though, this thread is by far the most objective and accurate.

You also keep coming back to my "mislabeling" her as a "useless SJW", but that label too is accurate. If you will look at the comments on various sites running this video, you will see actual SJW's begging her to drop it and move on. The Tararist is a real martyr without a cause, as in the realm of public opinion, almost nobody wishes for her support. Nobody is buying her vicarious suffering.

Nobody will hire her. She is indeed useless. Her toxicity is recognized even by those she claims as allies.

Your point is moot.

The label is only accurate to you as you made it up from your beliefs and not facts. But, you are right, my points are moot here, not because they are incorrect, just because you believe they are incorrect.

You argue, but you don't provide any facts or evidence to back up your position, which I may say is weak and has nothing to do about politics.

Nor does anyone else here have any real facts, just conjecture. Hopefully, somebody can obtain a copy of the court transcript, where we will read an admission to being a 'useless SJW', or a triggered political activist, or a mentally troubled person unable to cope with opposing political freedoms of speech.

a reply to: InTheLight

Nor does anyone else here have any real facts

Er, yes we do.

We have the facts of how she described the encounter while waiting on the cop. We have her words when talking to the cop. We have her admission of her actions on that day. We have her own tweets. We have her essay. We have verification that she has been served with court papers. We have the words of her supporters and her detractors.

Those are facts.

You are giving opinions.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: Bobaganoosh
a reply to: InTheLight

This is not the only message board with this story. Though, this thread is by far the most objective and accurate.

You also keep coming back to my "mislabeling" her as a "useless SJW", but that label too is accurate. If you will look at the comments on various sites running this video, you will see actual SJW's begging her to drop it and move on. The Tararist is a real martyr without a cause, as in the realm of public opinion, almost nobody wishes for her support. Nobody is buying her vicarious suffering.

Nobody will hire her. She is indeed useless. Her toxicity is recognized even by those she claims as allies.

Your point is moot.

The label is only accurate to you as you made it up from your beliefs and not facts. But, you are right, my points are moot here, not because they are incorrect, just because you believe they are incorrect.

You argue, but you don't provide any facts or evidence to back up your position, which I may say is weak and has nothing to do about politics.

Nor does anyone else here have any real facts, just conjecture. Hopefully, somebody can obtain a copy of the court transcript, where we will read an admission to being a 'useless SJW', or a triggered political activist, or a mentally troubled person unable to cope with opposing political freedoms of speech.

If you bothered to read her own Tweets here as well as the other evidence you'll see most of what the court will, minus the surveillance footage. The surveillance footage has been described, by someone who's already seen it, to show her out of the car several times, at first harassing his girlfriend and later him. I'm comfortable waiting to see the court verdict…are you?

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: Bobaganoosh
a reply to: InTheLight

This is not the only message board with this story. Though, this thread is by far the most objective and accurate.

You also keep coming back to my "mislabeling" her as a "useless SJW", but that label too is accurate. If you will look at the comments on various sites running this video, you will see actual SJW's begging her to drop it and move on. The Tararist is a real martyr without a cause, as in the realm of public opinion, almost nobody wishes for her support. Nobody is buying her vicarious suffering.

Nobody will hire her. She is indeed useless. Her toxicity is recognized even by those she claims as allies.

Your point is moot.

The label is only accurate to you as you made it up from your beliefs and not facts. But, you are right, my points are moot here, not because they are incorrect, just because you believe they are incorrect.

You argue, but you don't provide any facts or evidence to back up your position, which I may say is weak and has nothing to do about politics.

Nor does anyone else here have any real facts, just conjecture. Hopefully, somebody can obtain a copy of the court transcript, where we will read an admission to being a 'useless SJW', or a triggered political activist, or a mentally troubled person unable to cope with opposing political freedoms of speech.

The court has already issued a Temporary Restraining order on Tara Dublin based upon the facts. So yes, you see the evidence here that matches the courts considerations. Evidence you seem to reject out of a distinct BIAS. If she's done nothing you can't get a Restraining Order over nothing. She's in trouble and the thread here is a discussion of the situation and the evidence. Tara, by her own admission, wanted the video shared and discussed.

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: InTheLight

Nor does anyone else here have any real facts

Er, yes we do.

We have the facts of how she described the encounter while waiting on the cop. We have her words when talking to the cop. We have her admission of her actions on that day. We have her own tweets. We have her essay. We have verification that she has been served with court papers. We have the words of her supporters and her detractors.

Those are facts.

You are giving opinions.

TheRedneck

Nobody here has any facts on what motivated her actions in the first place. But, it seems, nobody really wants to discuss the underlying issues of why people act out in situations such as these; just a feel good berating thread is all that is needed and desired, as par the course here.

It will be interesting to me to find out exactly what the court case findings will turn up.

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: InTheLight

Nor does anyone else here have any real facts

Er, yes we do.

We have the facts of how she described the encounter while waiting on the cop. We have her words when talking to the cop. We have her admission of her actions on that day. We have her own tweets. We have her essay. We have verification that she has been served with court papers. We have the words of her supporters and her detractors.

Those are facts.

You are giving opinions.

TheRedneck

Nobody here has any facts on what motivated her actions in the first place. But, it seems, nobody really wants to discuss the underlying issues of why people act out in situations such as these; just a feel good berating thread is all that is needed and desired, as par the course here.

It will be interesting to me to find out exactly what the court case findings will turn up.

False. Plenty of discussion if you'd bothered to read it was about motivations. What are you here for? Enlighten us as to your OPINION on her motivation?

a reply to: thepixelpusher

I don't claim she did nothing wrong, I am wondering as to her mental health. And as for the court case, I doubt she will have a compassionate hearing or a judge that has training in this type of political activism taken too far due to anger issues or mental issues.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: InTheLight

Nor does anyone else here have any real facts

Er, yes we do.

We have the facts of how she described the encounter while waiting on the cop. We have her words when talking to the cop. We have her admission of her actions on that day. We have her own tweets. We have her essay. We have verification that she has been served with court papers. We have the words of her supporters and her detractors.

Those are facts.

You are giving opinions.

TheRedneck

Nobody here has any facts on what motivated her actions in the first place. But, it seems, nobody really wants to discuss the underlying issues of why people act out in situations such as these; just a feel good berating thread is all that is needed and desired, as par the course here.

It will be interesting to me to find out exactly what the court case findings will turn up.

False. Plenty of discussion if you'd bothered to read it was about motivations. What are you here for? Enlighten us as to your OPINION on her motivation?

We can only guess as to motivation without knowing her mental state at the time of the confrontation with sign guy. I only jumped in here because one of your visitors posted that violence was the answer to this woman's non-violent actions, which someone replied 'pathetic', and to which I agree - pathetic.

I also noticed that you have succeeded in swaying the easily led public opinion here with incorrect labels, adjectives and assumptions, and this makes me wonder what is your motivation.

originally posted by: InTheLight
a reply to: thepixelpusher

I don't claim she did nothing wrong, I am wondering as to her mental health. And as for the court case, I doubt she will have a compassionate hearing or a judge that has training in this type of political activism taken too far due to anger issues or mental issues.

Why do you ASSUME the judge has no compassion or experience in handling this? Basically, it comes down to laws broken and responsibility. If she had shot him you'd think the judge should judge her based upon some compassion to her feelings or motivations about this election!??

I'm content to judge all this by facts and the court decision. Fact is, the court already issued a restraining order. FACT, not OPINION. Look it up if you don't believe me.

ATS members are not easily swayed and that has never been my intention or motivation. Just plain discussion of the FACTS and situation and it's effects, like all the discussions on this board.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: InTheLight
a reply to: thepixelpusher

I don't claim she did nothing wrong, I am wondering as to her mental health. And as for the court case, I doubt she will have a compassionate hearing or a judge that has training in this type of political activism taken too far due to anger issues or mental issues.

Why do you ASSUME the judge has no compassion or experience in handling this? Basically, it comes down to laws broken and responsibility. If she had shot him you'd think the judge should judge her based upon some compassion to her feelings or motivations about this election!??

Because I have worked in courtrooms and I know that the majority of the mentally ill fall through the cracks and end up in jail/prison, or are released back into society with a warning. Unless it is blatantly obvious that a person is suffering from delusions or the like in front of the judge, the legal process will move along swiftly as the law dictates. So, with that fact, none of us should be content with the legal system.

Some here are easily swayed, depending on their berating mood.

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: InTheLight
a reply to: thepixelpusher

I don't claim she did nothing wrong, I am wondering as to her mental health. And as for the court case, I doubt she will have a compassionate hearing or a judge that has training in this type of political activism taken too far due to anger issues or mental issues.

Why do you ASSUME the judge has no compassion or experience in handling this? Basically, it comes down to laws broken and responsibility. If she had shot him you'd think the judge should judge her based upon some compassion to her feelings or motivations about this election!??

Because I have worked in courtrooms and I know that the majority of the mentally ill fall through the cracks and end up in jail/prison, or are released back into society with a warning. Unless it is blatantly obvious that a person is suffering from delusions or the like in front of the judge, the legal process will move along swiftly as the law dictates.

I would hope you are wrong and that she gets the attention she needs in mental health if that is judged to be the case. That requires a psychological review. If you bothered to read the whole thread I have voiced support for her getting mental health treatment and hoped she'd stop from getting herself too far into legal jeopardy. She didn't stop and that is why this discussion goes on. READ the thread!!

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: InTheLight
a reply to: thepixelpusher

I don't claim she did nothing wrong, I am wondering as to her mental health. And as for the court case, I doubt she will have a compassionate hearing or a judge that has training in this type of political activism taken too far due to anger issues or mental issues.

Why do you ASSUME the judge has no compassion or experience in handling this? Basically, it comes down to laws broken and responsibility. If she had shot him you'd think the judge should judge her based upon some compassion to her feelings or motivations about this election!??

Because I have worked in courtrooms and I know that the majority of the mentally ill fall through the cracks and end up in jail/prison, or are released back into society with a warning. Unless it is blatantly obvious that a person is suffering from delusions or the like in front of the judge, the legal process will move along swiftly as the law dictates.

I would hope you are wrong and that she gets the attention she needs in mental health if that is judged to be the case. That requires a psychological review. If you bothered to read the whole thread I have voiced support for her getting mental health treatment and hoped she's stop from getting herself too far into legal jeopardy. READ the thread!!

You may see that, and I may see that, but the OP and many others do not. So, it bears repeating.

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: InTheLight
a reply to: thepixelpusher

I don't claim she did nothing wrong, I am wondering as to her mental health. And as for the court case, I doubt she will have a compassionate hearing or a judge that has training in this type of political activism taken too far due to anger issues or mental issues.

Why do you ASSUME the judge has no compassion or experience in handling this? Basically, it comes down to laws broken and responsibility. If she had shot him you'd think the judge should judge her based upon some compassion to her feelings or motivations about this election!??

Because I have worked in courtrooms and I know that the majority of the mentally ill fall through the cracks and end up in jail/prison, or are released back into society with a warning. Unless it is blatantly obvious that a person is suffering from delusions or the like in front of the judge, the legal process will move along swiftly as the law dictates.

I would hope you are wrong and that she gets the attention she needs in mental health if that is judged to be the case. That requires a psychological review. If you bothered to read the whole thread I have voiced support for her getting mental health treatment and hoped she's stop from getting herself too far into legal jeopardy. READ the thread!!

You may see that, and I may see that, but the OP and many others do not. So, it bears repeating.

Did you discuss this with each poster here!? How would you know from the limited comments exactly what each person here believes!!!??? Most of the commenters discerned her lies and felt the guy was getting a bum rap from her publicly. And I mean PUBLICLY INTO THE DIRT.

Can somebody please mute The Light or segregate her obfuscation to a different thread? This obfuscation is derailing the thread. That she constantly spam replies does not help either.

a reply to: InTheLight

I see it, I just said that I don't care. Droning on about it isn't going to make me care. I am only speaking for myself.

Sorry I cannot muster up any compassion for the Tararist.

I didn't make the thread for people to feel sorry for her.

Is there anyone here that thinks she will walk out of court without any consequences when she already has a retraining order against her? If the judges decides she has no blame, I'll accept it. Though, the thread FACTS discussed already don't seem to support her getting out of this without any legal jeopardy. It is sad, but seemingly self inflicted. Unless the guy abducted her and made her tweet the crazy crap she was tweeting.