It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Tara tweeted this after the order?
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: InTheLight
It will be interesting to know the judge's findings on this type of political social unrest...
The judge will not give a judgement on political social unrest. That's not how it works.
The judge will review the evidence submitted by the attorneys, listen to the arguments made by the attorneys, and consider the testimony of any witnesses during the trial. He will then make a decision based on that information as to whether a law was broken and hand down an applicable verdict. The burden of proof is initially on the plaintiff (the man in this case), then if the judge feels there is sufficient evidence to continue, on the defendant (Tara Dublin in this case). If she can prove her innocence, or disprove the allegations against her, there will be no judgement/conviction; if she cannot, the judge will award damages if the case is civil, or will sentence her if it is criminal.
That's all it is: two people looking to the court to right an alleged wrong. This will not have any consequences toward the election, social attitudes, or anything so wide-ranging. Only the Federal or higher State courts do that.
I can understand how recent Supreme Court decisions can give the impression that this is more than it is, but this is not going before the Federal courts. It's one out-of-control, twitter-addicted, insane woman going off the deep end and attacking a man without reason. That's all, despite what Tara or anyone else wants it to be.
TheRedneck
It will most likely result in the judge telling both parties they behaved badly and start acting like adults.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: InTheLight
It will be interesting to know the judge's findings on this type of political social unrest...
The judge will not give a judgement on political social unrest. That's not how it works.
The judge will review the evidence submitted by the attorneys, listen to the arguments made by the attorneys, and consider the testimony of any witnesses during the trial. He will then make a decision based on that information as to whether a law was broken and hand down an applicable verdict. The burden of proof is initially on the plaintiff (the man in this case), then if the judge feels there is sufficient evidence to continue, on the defendant (Tara Dublin in this case). If she can prove her innocence, or disprove the allegations against her, there will be no judgement/conviction; if she cannot, the judge will award damages if the case is civil, or will sentence her if it is criminal.
That's all it is: two people looking to the court to right an alleged wrong. This will not have any consequences toward the election, social attitudes, or anything so wide-ranging. Only the Federal or higher State courts do that.
I can understand how recent Supreme Court decisions can give the impression that this is more than it is, but this is not going before the Federal courts. It's one out-of-control, twitter-addicted, insane woman going off the deep end and attacking a man without reason. That's all, despite what Tara or anyone else wants it to be.
TheRedneck
It will most likely result in the judge telling both parties they behaved badly and start acting like adults.
There is no equal behaviour here. What this woman did was pathetic and vindictive. She's a moron. The guy did nothing wrong at all and if he has filed suit against her, I hope she gets punished for her anti-social behaviour accordingly. She needs to be taught a lesson - one which I would hope would also let others like her that her behaviour is totally unacceptable.
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: InTheLight
It will be interesting to know the judge's findings on this type of political social unrest...
The judge will not give a judgement on political social unrest. That's not how it works.
The judge will review the evidence submitted by the attorneys, listen to the arguments made by the attorneys, and consider the testimony of any witnesses during the trial. He will then make a decision based on that information as to whether a law was broken and hand down an applicable verdict. The burden of proof is initially on the plaintiff (the man in this case), then if the judge feels there is sufficient evidence to continue, on the defendant (Tara Dublin in this case). If she can prove her innocence, or disprove the allegations against her, there will be no judgement/conviction; if she cannot, the judge will award damages if the case is civil, or will sentence her if it is criminal.
That's all it is: two people looking to the court to right an alleged wrong. This will not have any consequences toward the election, social attitudes, or anything so wide-ranging. Only the Federal or higher State courts do that.
I can understand how recent Supreme Court decisions can give the impression that this is more than it is, but this is not going before the Federal courts. It's one out-of-control, twitter-addicted, insane woman going off the deep end and attacking a man without reason. That's all, despite what Tara or anyone else wants it to be.
TheRedneck
It will most likely result in the judge telling both parties they behaved badly and start acting like adults.
There is no equal behaviour here. What this woman did was pathetic and vindictive. She's a moron. The guy did nothing wrong at all and if he has filed suit against her, I hope she gets punished for her anti-social behaviour accordingly. She needs to be taught a lesson - one which I would hope would also let others like her that her behaviour is totally unacceptable.
How many signs did this guy have out on his lawn?
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Stupid anti-trumper and stupid trumper. But let's just focus on the stupid anti-trumper.
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Stupid anti-trumper and stupid trumper. But let's just focus on the stupid anti-trumper.
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Stupid anti-trumper and stupid trumper. But let's just focus on the stupid anti-trumper.
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Stupid anti-trumper and stupid trumper. But let's just focus on the stupid anti-trumper.
Judge already put Restrainimg order on the only guilty party. The anti-Trumper. So O guess the court has spoken on this. Will you accept that?
She was simply frustrated and angry at a Trump supporter who probably went overboard on his lawn signs -
originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: InTheLight
She was simply frustrated and angry at a Trump supporter who probably went overboard on his lawn signs -
Are you being serious right now!?!
I can put 50 PRO-Trump signs in my yard and YOU or anyone else just has to deal with it.
I think you need to read through this thread before making comments...you are only making yourself look bad!
originally posted by: SprocketUK
a reply to: InTheLight
How many Democrats just drive past yards with Trump signs in and respect the other person's right to show support for a different candidate?
How many Republicans do the same?
Excusing this woman's behaviour is a big part of the problem.
It needs to be called out for the idiotic act of uncivilised intolerance that it is. Any attempt to downplay what she (and other political and social retards) have done is simply foolish. Every one of them needs to be pilloried until they change their ways and act civilised like normal people.
originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: InTheLight
Grow up! That is what is wrong with this world! If you are so easily triggered maybe you shouldn't leave this house.
THIS was his yard by the way. Care to rethink your argument!?!
An you REALLY need to read. She has done SO much more than just "flip someone off"