Keith Lamont Scott record...multiple armed felonies but yeah...lets protest.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Not outside a courtroom to determine if that person should be executed or not.

a reply to: TinfoilTP

Don't hide behind words, Just say it.

a reply to: kruphix

People need to justify their opinions when they know they are ridiculous...this is how people do it with communities being assaulted and looted by rioters.

They try to dig up something that may have happened to one member of the special interest group rioting and say "See,one of their own got the shaft so the entirety of the group has an excuse to act like jackasses". It's makes them feel better, when what they really think is "Yeah, eff the system! We're gonna get ours, too. Life owes me because, goddamnit, I exist and working to earn this stuff is hard".

a reply to: burdman30ott6

Is someone defending the looters?

a reply to: kruphix

I'd say offering excuses for their behavior and trying to deflect attention away from it is a form of defense, so yeah, yeah people are.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

Who's offering excuses for the looters behavior?

Examples would be nice.

originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Not outside a courtroom to determine if that person should be executed or not.

Ok, so lets play this scenario out...outside of the shooting that happened that is.

A. Convicted Felon in possession of a gun surrenders and police take him quietly. He is sentenced to the 10 year mandatory minimum. 10 years at the average cost for an inmate in NC being roughly $30K per year charged to tax payers. So roughly $300k for the 10 years assuming that is all he got. He has 7 children for which he is responsible whom all have to now go on welfare. I don't have time to check out the figures on this but I am sure for a family of 7 for 10 years it is not cheap for the tax payers.

Anywho...that is BEST case scenario

B. Suspect aims and shoots and officer, maybe even kills the officer, at which point officers fire back either ending with the same outcome we already have or wounding him and him ending up in prison longer, costing the taxpayers even more money.

So, a person who has already cost taxpayers PLENTY and had NUMEROUS chances yet chooses to AGAIN break the law is someone I am supposed to feel bad for when they get shot AGAIN breaking the law? And I am supposed to make the police feel bad for this?

He was a WASTE of breath and proved it for over 25 years. I am still waiting to see what his "disability" was that is being claimed by his family. I am betting it was a fraudulent disability claim so he could get free money.

Sorry....not willing to give a multi time convicted criminal the benefit of the doubt....that is just plain idiocy.

Now had he been an upstanding local citizen that had no record....sure I would be saying something completely different.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

After you said all that...the simple fact still remains the same.

You are attempting to justify a murder of someone you deem not worth living, outside our justice system provided by the Constitution.

Further, it is clear to see what major factor is playing a role in your enjoyment of this murder.

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
multiple felony convictions

So, Scott was convicted of a misdemeanor 12 years ago, driving under the influence last year, charged with some other stuff 25 years ago, was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon (a felony) served his time, and was released 5 years ago.

Where are the "multiple" felony convictions? I see one, for which he served his time. So, are you saying that if a person is convicted of a felony and serve their time, their killing can be justified, even when the cops don't know who it is they're shooting or what his past history is?

Sure, some of the shootings can't be justified, but this one is NOT one of those.

People need to justify their opinions when they know they are vile...this is how people do it with minorities being killed by cops.

They try to dig up something about their past and say "See,he was a bad person and deserved to be executed without a judge or jury". It's makes them feel better, when what they really think is "He was black, probably was a bad person anyway, he deserved to die".

No it is showing a pattern of behavior that may have led to him acting in such a way that justified the shooting. The family said he had no gun and only a book. Police report saids otherwise at the moment. The background favors the police action, due to the fact if he was caught with the firearm he was going back to prison. He probably saw them coming. Tried to get rid of the piece and ended putting himself in the middle of the situation because of it. Granted that is speculation on my part but it at least fits logically with what we know officially so far.

originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: Vasa Croe

After you said all that...the simple fact still remains the same.

You are attempting to justify a murder of someone you deem not worth living, outside our justice system provided by the Constitution.

Further, it is clear to see what major factor is playing a role in your enjoyment of this murder.

Ok...assault on a minor under the age of 12 and assault with a deadly weapon in his past....yes, please lets just give him ONE more chance.

Sorry...they guy was just living on borrowed time.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

You are still just trying to justify murder.

What if someone looks into your past, and decides by their own opinion/values (outside the justice system) that something you did in the past makes you not worth living?

originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: Vasa Croe

You are still just trying to justify murder.

What if someone looks into your past, and decides by their own opinion/values (outside the justice system) that something you did in the past makes you not worth living?

Well...there's my point...they couldn't. I have no criminal record nor have I done anything to harm anyone else.

His actions were those that can be recorded by the justice system and have been.

So your thought is that someone may think any action I have ever done may be deemed death worthy regardless of any laws about it?

Something along the lines of a religious zealot saying my being divorced is death worthy? I think that's a bit different than what we are looking at here.

OP, thanks for this. Brilliant work.
It is truly amazing that the MSM with all their money have failed to find this out and are pressing on with the doting father who picks up his son daily narrative.

Seems like another very embarrassing episode for BLM and the agitators.

a reply to: UKTruth

Seems like another very embarrassing episode for BLM and the agitators.

how?

originally posted by: stinkelbaum
a reply to: UKTruth

Seems like another very embarrassing episode for BLM and the agitators.

how?

Really?
They riot, beat up and loot before any facts have come out, except that the guy had a gun and had previous.
Doesn't help their cause much, does it.
Why should anyone ever believe their bull# narrative again, after the whole "hands up don't shoot" episode and now this?

They are showing the world it's they who are racist thugs.

originally posted by: YenSid
a reply to: TinfoilTP

Don't hide behind words, Just say it.

That his record shows he was a thug? I pointed this obvious fact out many times.

originally posted by: UKTruth
OP, thanks for this. Brilliant work.
It is truly amazing that the MSM with all their money have failed to find this out and are pressing on with the doting father who picks up his son daily narrative.

Seems like another very embarrassing episode for BLM and the agitators.

Its been obvious for a long time that MSM is only about portraying the victim side versus those the "Victim" actually victimized themselves.

A career criminal being a loving father is not really that shocking. As portrayed by most gang/mob stories/biographies, their families were always very fond of them....they were just criminals for a living.

There is a report here:

pjmedia.com...

that claims the DOJ are actually involved in agitating against the police and stirring up the riots.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Vasa Croe

This is going to continue until the feds step in and create a federal police force.

State, local cops will be a thing of the past.

Imagine armed TSA agents at every street corner.

And remember the outcry over Arizona wanting to check for citizenship? Yeah, when we get that Federal police force, they'll likely do it and everyone will like it. There will be no, but it's illegal then. And the irony will be that the biggest ones arguing that it's bad to have to have your "Papers, please," will be the biggest cheerleaders of the new measure "for the children!"

originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: Vasa Croe

You are still just trying to justify murder.

What if someone looks into your past, and decides by their own opinion/values (outside the justice system) that something you did in the past makes you not worth living?

Simple question:

Did he comply with the cops' orders? If not and he was armed, then he made his own bed, record in his past or not.