It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: MotherMayEye
I recall this potion:
"Our team concluded that what he was trying to do was when they produced emails not have the actual address but have some name or placeholder instead of the actual dot-com address in the 'From:' line," Comey said.
And I remember thinking of your post pointing out the fact that by this time, Hillary's email address was already known so that excuse would not hold up to scrutiny. We will have to wait until an official transcript of the hearing is posted in order to get a better idea of the context.
My point is isn't just putting this placeholder in considered tampering with evidence? If congress asked me for records, I don't get to go in and decide to replace my email address or other such things for my convenience, even if I have no nefarious reason to do that.
Congress wanted the records totally as is. Seeing Hillary's email exactly as it was on these documents could have been important to their inquiry. For example, if they thought that these documents could have been hacked, they would want to know exactly what addresses the hackers got.
And again, keep in mind Comey fully admitted he thinks the they in the reddit post to Combetta is Mills. So why would Mills be telling Combetta the day after these records were requested by congress to put in a place holder for her email. Was she worried congress would see Clintons actual email. Why would this be the case?
This proves Mills wanted more than just a placeholder put in, she wanted Hillary off of the list altogether. When they couldn't accomplish this, they used bleach bit to delete them all.
So Comeys excuse makes no sense. They knew Mills asked Combetta to break the law, and they didn't pursue it.
They say they gave Combetta immunity to get to bigger fish, and they knew about this reddit thread, so why in gods name couldn't they get Mills?
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
Ok. Is there any evidence, at all, that the FBI knew about the Stonetear posts before Katica discovered them?
Anything?
As Comey would say...So & So's story is credible absent any evidence to prove the contrary.
Comey didn't even have a story or facts. All he committed to was what "he thought" and what he was "not sure" about. So is there any evidence...because Comey's attempt at feigning a story is not credible.
I've listened to a good portion of the hearing again, and Comey was careful not to state anything pertaining to the FBI's alleged investigation into the Reddit story as fact. Red. Flag.
No one in the committee pinned him down, either, forcing him to state with certainty anything about the FBI's conclusions & investigation into the Reddit story.
It's all a red flag.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
Ok. Is there any evidence, at all, that the FBI knew about the Stonetear posts before Katica discovered them?
Anything?
As Comey would say...So & So's story is credible absent any evidence to prove the contrary.
Comey didn't even have a story or facts. All he committed to was what "he thought" and what he was "not sure" about. So is there any evidence...because Comey's attempt at feigning a story is not credible.
I've listened to a good portion of the hearing again, and Comey was careful not to state anything pertaining to the FBI's alleged investigation into the Reddit story as fact. Red. Flag.
No one in the committee pinned him down, either, forcing him to state with certainty anything about the FBI's conclusions & investigation into the Reddit story.
It's all a red flag.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
Ok. Is there any evidence, at all, that the FBI knew about the Stonetear posts before Katica discovered them?
Anything?
As Comey would say...So & So's story is credible absent any evidence to prove the contrary.
Comey didn't even have a story or facts. All he committed to was what "he thought" and what he was "not sure" about. So is there any evidence...because Comey's attempt at feigning a story is not credible.
I've listened to a good portion of the hearing again, and Comey was careful not to state anything pertaining to the FBI's alleged investigation into the Reddit story as fact. Red. Flag.
No one in the committee pinned him down, either, forcing him to state with certainty anything about the FBI's conclusions & investigation into the Reddit story.
It's all a red flag.
If the FBI knew about Combetta's Reddit posts before...WHY didn't they subpoena/request all files from Reddit at the time?
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
Ok. Is there any evidence, at all, that the FBI knew about the Stonetear posts before Katica discovered them?
Anything?
As Comey would say...So & So's story is credible absent any evidence to prove the contrary.
Comey didn't even have a story or facts. All he committed to was what "he thought" and what he was "not sure" about. So is there any evidence...because Comey's attempt at feigning a story is not credible.
I've listened to a good portion of the hearing again, and Comey was careful not to state anything pertaining to the FBI's alleged investigation into the Reddit story as fact. Red. Flag.
No one in the committee pinned him down, either, forcing him to state with certainty anything about the FBI's conclusions & investigation into the Reddit story.
It's all a red flag.
If the FBI knew about Combetta's Reddit posts before...WHY didn't they subpoena/request all files from Reddit at the time?
That is a great point I hadn't thought of! Do we know that they didn't?
Also, was it the FBI or the oversight committee that requested the reddit files this week?
Is there any evidence, at all, that the FBI knew about the Stonetear posts before Katica discovered them?
originally posted by: alomaha
Maybe I am too naive but I don't think that members of Oversight Committee hadn't pinned Comey down on purpose, I think you are giving thgem too much credit. I just think they were not up to the challenge. Comey simple outplayed them. I really think that they are not smart enough to come to all these conclusions that you guys are coming to. If they could just somehow read some of your posts...although I know there's very little chance for that...
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: alomaha
Maybe I am too naive but I don't think that members of Oversight Committee hadn't pinned Comey down on purpose, I think you are giving thgem too much credit. I just think they were not up to the challenge. Comey simple outplayed them. I really think that they are not smart enough to come to all these conclusions that you guys are coming to. If they could just somehow read some of your posts...although I know there's very little chance for that...
Ha, well I'm admittedly cynical, like Comey.
Everyone but my spouse is a liar.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: alomaha
Maybe I am too naive but I don't think that members of Oversight Committee hadn't pinned Comey down on purpose, I think you are giving thgem too much credit. I just think they were not up to the challenge. Comey simple outplayed them. I really think that they are not smart enough to come to all these conclusions that you guys are coming to. If they could just somehow read some of your posts...although I know there's very little chance for that...
Ha, well I'm admittedly cynical, like Comey.
Everyone but my spouse is a liar.
HEY! Who are you calling a liar?