Reddit post apparently related to Clintons email coverup

Oh man. 9 pages in and not one peep from the usual suspects. This must have them them hiding like a turtle in their shells.

Good work on the Reddit community for bringing this to light. But, sadly, nothing, yet again, will come of this in a legal sense. But, to quote Xuenchen, Trump just gained 2 million new votes.

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
a reply to: sputniksteve

So... if we accept your narration of the reddit community, the built in anonymity along with some decent resources to handle tech centric dilemmas ...

Why in the hell did this guy scramble to ERASE his internet footprint associated with the nomiker stonetear

It doesn't add up... no matter the spin/deflection attempted... the folks aren't as SHEEPLE as they think they are...

Revenge of the SHEEPLE.. in progress... and I love it

I don't mean to say that it is beyond reproach or anything, rock solid. All I am saying that the defense of they couldn't possibly be that stupid isn't much a defense. Or to act like Reddit is incapable of giving good advice is just silly. On top of that is it honestly that outlandish to someone that a person could overlook something like that as one day coming back to hurt them?

Or (since we are on a conspiracy board) I suppose it could be that he knew exactly what he was doing. Could be he knew he couldn't testify even with immunity because someone might still do him harm but he thought he could still white knight the world and play it off like an accident?

I can't believe we are discussing this. So bizarre either way. What has our nation come to?

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: EchoesInTime

A coverup is evidence of a guilty conscience and can be used to prove intent.

Would the DOJ/FBI reopen the investigation? I don't know. I suppose if Congress refers it back to the FBI, it could be reopened.

This story is starting to grow wings and fly. US News, CNBC, and The Hill, are covering it prominently. What's the next level up for exposure?

a reply to: Agit8dChop

From what I read, this I.T. guy isn't as computer savvy as we are! He might even be Team Leader of the group that "protected" the DNC's e-mail and communications systems. No wonder Assange said that hacking the DNC was VERY easy.

It's just a smoke screen. The real question is why go with a personal privately owned server as opposed to a legal government server?

The evidence is clearly laid out in the FBI report... the State Department built not 1, but 2 different SCIFs in her residences for her use as SoS.

They built her 2 SCIF"S.... designed to handle classified information according to the standards set forth by NSA.

Al she had to do was do it the right way.......... she chose another path.


She is reaping the benefits of the seeds she has sown. Looks like her crop is going south at this point.

originally posted by: RickinVa
It's just a smoke screen. The real question is why go with a personal privately owned server as opposed to a legal government server?

It shows consciousness of guilt.

a reply to: Agit8dChop

Well, I'm not seeing how the witch can't wiggle out of this one. I mean, the way it's worded, it was just the email address they wanted to change, and the way he said it makes it appear that he didn't want people to know the email address. He could just say that he didn't want Pickles to have to respond to a bunch of emails from the hoi polloi.

Now, don't get me wrong. I want Pickles in jail just as much as anyone, but it's because of the corruption, the graft, the mysterious murders of so many around her, and her general lying disposition and arrogance. It all comes down to a tainted DoJ. And the DoJ has been corrupted for DECADES, going way back to Jackson days. They ain't gonna prosecute anyone if they don't 'want to'. And there's not a danged thing in the Constitution that I know of that will solve this. It's not like the Legislative branch has shown any desire at all to really get down to brass tacks on a single scandal in the 20th and 21st centuries. And if you think the Iran-Contra or Watergate were 'in-depth' investigations, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn I'm lookin to sell...

originally posted by: FlyingFox

originally posted by: RickinVa
It's just a smoke screen. The real question is why go with a personal privately owned server as opposed to a legal government server?

It shows consciousness of guilt.

The consciousness of guilt was previously shown by her decision to bypass secure government methods in favor of her own nonsecure server.

It would be nice if this turns out to be true. Kudos to who ever found it.

originally posted by: queenofswords
The problem I see in this mess (Chaffetz was right. This is the largest breach of security in State history) is that it is up to the FBI and the DOJ to take this investigation all the way and to leave no stone unturned., and to prosecute those that are covering up vital pieces of information that could help congress resolve this.

There is too much evidence to show something very wrong took place against the American people.

Why, why, why are the FBI and DOJ not doing their due diligence?

What are they afraid of?

Something is seriously wrong in this admiistration....seriously wrong!

I hope Chaffetz and Trey Gowdy keep pursuing this no matter what. We The People have a right to know how criminal the woman running for POTUS really is.

If you are honestly asking 'why, why why?', you haven't been doing much research on what the FBI is truly about. It was started by a guy who was easily blackmailed because he was homosexual. And the mafia took advantage of that and blackmailed him for decades. Hoover used to get up in front of Congress and swear under oath that there was no 'Cosa Nostra' or nationally organized crime in this country. And he KNEW he was lying. You can *start* there.

Then look at Mena Airport and the Iran-Contra scandal that never uncovered the coc aine trafficking the CIA was doing there. The FBI was asked to look into it, and sent special agents from DC. Unfortunately, these were CORRUPT agents sent by the FBI to make sure NOTHING was revealed. As was proven by many statements from threatened witnesses.

Then move ahead to the Franklin Scandal, where FBI agents specifically targeted the innocent child victims and threatened them AND their families to stay quiet. They even railroaded a young girl who had been RAPED by the chief of police when she refused to stay quiet and got her 16 years (FOR PERJURY!!!) for something she was telling the truth about!

Then when Gary Caradori and his 11 year old son were flying back from Chicago with PROOF of the elite child trafficking and porn, and their plane mysteriously blew up, it was the FBI who showed up in some remote farmer's field within 15 minutes (!!!) of the explosion and picked up all the dirty pictures that were strewn over the field (this is according to the farmer).

So stop with the 'I can't believe the FBI is not doing anything'! All of our gov't agencies are completely corrupted and have been for decades. It ain't just Obama. It's Bush II, and Clinton and Bush 1 and Ford and Nixon and Carter. And it's because you don't DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. I've called my congressmen and they don't do jack squat. But perhaps yours are more honest than mine and not already bought and paid for. The fact is that the gov't has gone completely amok.

a reply to: intrptr

Not weird for IT pros to interact with each other online to get things done. In fact, I would say that it's basically all IT people do. It's impossible to have all the answers, but looks real good if you at least know where to find them.

a reply to: nomoredemsorreps

Begs the question, what more can one do?

Whoever randomly remembered this reddit thread and exposed it, you're awesome! And thanks OP for the thread. Mostly commenting to keep tabs on the development of things.

The IT company was served a subpoena on July 23rd. He was asking for help to modify entries on July 24th.

Which means the email archive was in an undeleted and whole state, and was deleted in a panic after ordered to reveal.

This is huge, and Combetta may lose his immunity. Let's just hope he doesn't decide to commit suicide with 2 shots to the back of the head.

Jill Stein on Twitter: If it's true that #StoneTear is Clinton's IT specialist Paul Combetta, would that demonstrate *intent* to destroy evidence? #HillarysEmails

A lot of evidence coming out. Let me guess... Comcast is now having a late night record shredding session right about now.

Next post on Reddit... How do we destroy our records of a Very VIP's account without it looking, you know suspicious?? ::VIA Comcast Tech Support::.

LOL How far will this corruption go??

So much for the FBI.

I almost feel like this is another leak from an insider who doesn't like what's going on.

Seems as if there are a lot of people who have been involved that don't like whats going on because things just keep coming to the surface it's incredible.

originally posted by: Springer
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Correct, immunity deals are usually very specific in the hope of gaining more info and/or copping a conviction which always makes the intel fellas look good. Considering how BAD the top brass of the FBI looks in this deal I'd say his immunity deal in dire straits...

Go get 'em Reddit!

Took the words out of my mouth.

If this gets some real legs I would say there is going to be some resignations, at the FBI, and quite possibly criminal prosecution of high ups.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical

This dude's goose is well and truly cooked. If he didn't inform the FBI of this because he forgot, or didn't want to face the music, his immunity deal is likely null and void; Pagliano only had limited immunity, I imagine this guy is the same.

Other charges not directly related the immunity deal can still be brought.

And, Stonetear/Combetta was busy destroying evidence, just yesterday. Deleting his comments & posts was a bad idea.

That's partly why I don't think he told the FBI about it. If he did and they ignored it, I think they would have already been deleted before now.

ETA: Another thought...I'd think the first thing Combetta would have done is call his attorney after discovering what 'Katica' & the other redditors had put together.

Did he do that? Did his attorney advise him to delete his posts & comments? If so, that is very serious for the attorney, too.

I believe I read that the Clintons were paying for that attorney.

Just reading some of his post, Paul Combetta reminds me of Jonathan Gruber -

Obamacare Lie

Anyone else getting that vibe?

Ok, so we know at least one outlet has asked for a comment from the Clinton camp:

The Clinton campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Link

That story is 15 hours old.

It sure is taking the Clinton camp a long time to come up with a response. I don't see how they can run with a hoax/hacking response. I get the sense they are at a loss here to explain it.

And I am sure they aren't the only one who have asked for a comment. They just happened to run with the story without waiting for a response.

Info:
Immunity deal given to a person is extremely specific and if the person has not disclosed all infractions (think church confession), then their immunity is null and void. Period. Combetta will be charged if he didn't tell the FBI about this.

Hope he's in a safe house!