It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: mOjOm
No, she called Trump supporters deplorable and then defined deplorable as bigots. There's a difference.
Do you need to hear her speech again?
originally posted by: TheRedneck
When did I point my finger at the Mexican government, other than to indicate they are not providing well for their citizens?
She clearly isn't calling all Trump supporters Deplorable.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: TheRedneck
Putting all but "some who I suppose are good people" Mexicans into a criminal basket is deplorable. Defending such stereotyping is deplorable.
So if you're not one of those things being defined there, then she's not talking about you.
Trump provided his own wiggle room by saying some border jumpers are good hardworking people.
That covers anyone who defends Donald Trump.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
I know, it's very racist of me to say that, isn't it?
Yeah! "Sending" isn't an accidental verb. "Sending" is a thought out process that involves a plan.
Also, I don't think I called you personally deplorable, but if the shoe fits, wear it with pride!
originally posted by: TheRedneck
Or did you think I would suddenly realize how deplorable I was acting and start supporting Clinton?
Is what she did any different from Trump, who says "we have a problem with Group A, but I'm sure some are good hard working people." repeatedly PLAYING both sides. It's basic politics, first you call people bad apples, but then you say not everyone is a bad apple, in hopes of snaring poor suckers who fear being seen as bad apples. Simple.