Hillary Needed Help During The CIC Forum, Had Ear Piece

a reply to: UnBreakable

I think Hillary should reinvent herself again as the black widow. She could put on a Spider-Man like Hood which would hide her cross eyes lacerated tongue ear pieces and twitches.

originally posted by: kosmicjack
If it was actually an ear piece, don't you guys think someone would have noticed it, in the moment/live, and asked about it? It astounds me that, this many years later, the internet is still this gullible.

If it was flesh colored and embedded in her ear, who would've noticed? Matt Lauer was the only "someone" closest to her to have noticed. So you're saying Matt should have noticed.

Hillary's campaign staff told Fox News today that she did not wear an earpiece to The Forum last night. So, I guess we can put this to rest.

my bold below:

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: Junkheap

I think you do, cause you're clearly either delusional or some weird freaky mutant.

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Junkheap
Some of you people need to check your own ears out in a mirror.

There's nothing there.

You may want to try a new tactic on this one. There is clearly an ear piece being worn.

Why don't you just say its a hearing aid, or perhaps an ear piece just for security concerns? That would at least be far more credible than the strategy you are currently employing.

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: Grambler

This is why they have no credibility. They stick one hundred percent to denial on indisputable facts. If you refuse to accept basic undeniable clear as day reality, there's no reason for anyone to do anything but laugh them off.

Hmmm maybe that's the idea, "See look we are defending you master" but purposely doing it poorly cause in truth they are terrified same as the rest of us of her winning. This is my secret hope.

Everyone makes mistakes. People get snowed by hoaxes frequently, even those among us who do have informed, considered opinions, who give critical thought to what we read and do value intellectual honesty. Hell when I saw the picture in the OP I wasn't sure what I was seeing either. Look at the pictures I posted that didn't come from an "enhanced video" on Twitter.

Do you see an earpiece? I don't.

In fact, the only other "evidence" is an alleged anonymous NYPD source from a "news blog" I've never even heard of and I spend a lot of time reading far-right news blogs if for no other reason than to prove some of our ATS friends wrong.

I think we can all agree that credibility is important. You can't have an honest debate with somebody who will knowingly lie or simply refuse to concede a point when their own argument has become untenable so I can understand your frustration.

However, in this instance, I think you've both fallen for a hoax. I could be wrong but I sincerely believe that I'm not. I hope you'll reconsider your positions.

originally posted by: carewemust
Hillary's campaign staff told Fox News today that she did not wear an earpiece to The Forum last night. So, I guess we can put this to rest.

As long as the question is "What does Hillary's campaign have to say about her wearing an earpiece last night?".

originally posted by: carewemust
Hillary's campaign staff told Fox News today that she did not wear an earpiece to The Forum last night. So, I guess we can put this to rest.

Although Huma has alluded to her earpiece previously.

a reply to: sirlancelot
What about the regular debates? Will she be allowed to use an ear piece then? Will they check her ears?...probably see Trump at the podium...snark

a reply to: UnBreakable

Notice the date of the supposed email?

a reply to: UnBreakable

She wore an earpiece in 2009 therefore she was wearing an earpiece last night even though several images from a variety of credible sources don't show it and her campaign unequivocably denied it:

Fox News - Buzz about a 'bud': Clinton camp denies claims she wore earpiece at forum

The issue is whether or not she wore an earpiece last night. The only "evidence" comes from an "enhanced video" posted to Twitter and far-right news blog claiming to have an anonymous NYPD source claiming that she was wearing an earpiece.

This is a straight up hoax. Don't believe me. Go look for images from credible sources yourself.

I took some screen grabs from this video

As much as I'd like to see Hillary exposed for lying and cheating, I think the "ear piece" is some sort of camera anomaly due to the lights shining off her earrings. In the last screen grab the reflection/anomaly is outside of her ear.



watch the video clip toward the end and you'll see what I mean. An ear piece shouldn't hop around her ear like that.

originally posted by: xstealth
a reply to: theantediluvian

Hillary Clinton supporters have been photoshopping the ear piece from the popular photos out of it and saying it's the original.

I guess I'll have to watch on my HD TV.

Absolute rubbish sir,a Google search will reveal untouched images from the media involved in the event

I admit I wanted this to be true, and was pretty sure it was, but I just watched a clip from last night and I now think it was a reflection in this particular instance.

There's a video in the link below posted by Thomas Paine.

Watch the beginning to see that you can see what would be the earpiece.

At 35 seconds, she turns her head and you can very clearly see inside her ear and you see nothing, then she turns back and it returns. I think this closes the case for this instance, but I can't wait to see the debates.

www.infowars.com... piece-during-last-nights-presidential-forum/

ETA: Direct link to video
twitter.com...

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: UnBreakable

Notice the date of the supposed email?

Yes. Did you notice I used the word 'previously'?

a reply to: UnBreakable

I just hope "previously" means 7 years ago and not last night.

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: UnBreakable

Notice the date of the supposed email?

Yes and we wouldn't have to use 'supposed' in talking about emails if Hillary hadn't deleted and BleachBit them.

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: UnBreakable

I just hope "previously" means 7 years ago and not last night.

Yes, 7 years ago is previous. Thanks for making my point. It shows Hillary has used earpieces for at least seven years then.

When the first debate happens.....

Trump walks onto stage,

points in Hillary's direction,

says "check her ears"

Landslide, debates over.

a reply to: UnBreakable

No it doesn't. It may prove that 7 years ago she used an ear piece.

Don't they know that there are high res cameras everywhere? People aren't unaware nor un-observant. It's 2016 FFS.

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: UnBreakable

She wore an earpiece in 2009 therefore she was wearing an earpiece last night even though several images from a variety of credible sources don't show it and her campaign unequivocably denied it:

Fox News - Buzz about a 'bud': Clinton camp denies claims she wore earpiece at forum

The issue is whether or not she wore an earpiece last night. The only "evidence" comes from an "enhanced video" posted to Twitter and far-right news blog claiming to have an anonymous NYPD source claiming that she was wearing an earpiece.

This is a straight up hoax. Don't believe me. Go look for images from credible sources yourself.

I'm not saying she wore one last night, I only pointed out that she obviously has a history with earpieces as pointed out by Huma.

Credible sources? What do you consider 'credible' sources nowadays? Her campaign? Fox?