It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
It's not just the policies alone. It's the rhetoric and policies combined that may appeal to racists.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: introvert
It's not just the policies alone. It's the rhetoric and policies combined that may appeal to racists.
HA!!!!!
Ok, then I find Hillary's rhetoric and policies appeal to people that hate men. For god sakes, one of her biggest claims is vote for me cause I am a woman. Clearly this would appeal to man haters.
So you agree that she should be called out for appealing to man haters, right?
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: ketsuko
There is a difference between rhetoric and a campaign slogan.
Not really.
Then you need to learn the difference.
That is not my problem.
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: UKTruth
I don't think that is the whole of the meaning when Trump says it, but he knows what a certain segment of the population that like him will hear.
When Clinton said it, I don't think he was trying to reach that particular demographic . Just a hunch. Clinton said it once and he probably didn't even write the ad. It is Trump's slogan.
Oh yes, there are many more times Bill Clinton used that SAME phrase.
For more than two decades the Clintons have been issuing calls to make America great, great, great again. They offer a simple recipe for restoring lost national greatness: elect one of them president.
In 2007, presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton wrote in a piece for The New York Times (excerpted from a Foreign Affairs article) that the United States had been losing influence in the world. We needed to be guided by the goodness of “the American idea. If we can live up to that idea, if we can exercise our power wisely and well, we can make America great again.”
Bill Clinton pitched in several months later in South Carolina, where his wife was on the verge of a humiliating defeat by surging rival Barack Obama, according to a January 27, 2008 report in the Chicago Tribune. In a radio ad to what had once been a friendly Democratic electorate, Bill Clinton said, “We created more than 22 million new jobs, moved 8 million people out of poverty and turned our economy around. It’s time for another comeback; time to make America great again.”
It wasn’t the first time Bill Clinton had bemoaned American decline. His 1992 campaign was salted with promises of national greatness. He’d begun that improbably successful campaign against Republican incumbent George H. W. Bush with this: “Together we can make America great again, and with your help, your heart, your devotion, and your efforts, we can build a community of hope that will inspire the world.” www.insidesources.com...
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: ketsuko
There is a difference between rhetoric and a campaign slogan.
Not really.
Then you need to learn the difference.
That is not my problem.
Using it as rhetoric carries much more meaning than using it as a slogan.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: introvert
It's not just the policies alone. It's the rhetoric and policies combined that may appeal to racists.
HA!!!!!
Ok, then I find Hillary's rhetoric and policies appeal to people that hate men. For god sakes, one of her biggest claims is vote for me cause I am a woman. Clearly this would appeal to man haters.
So you agree that she should be called out for appealing to man haters, right?
Sure. Call her out all you like.
If you think discussing unequal pay between sexes to be hateful towards men and is equal to racism, there is nothing I can do to change your mind.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: ketsuko
There is a difference between rhetoric and a campaign slogan.
Not really.
Then you need to learn the difference.
That is not my problem.
Using it as rhetoric carries much more meaning than using it as a slogan.
Exactly my point.
Thanks!
But you are just asserting that he is racist.
Nice tactic, but I am pretty sure those reading can see the squirming you are doing.