It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: butcherguy
There is no proof that the clowns are sinister.
They probably are sinister (they are clowns luring children), but there is no proof of it.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: butcherguy
There is no proof that the clowns are sinister.
They probably are sinister (they are clowns luring children), but there is no proof of it.
There's no proof of luring anything, anywhere.
originally posted by: gunshooter
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: butcherguy
There is no proof that the clowns are sinister.
They probably are sinister (they are clowns luring children), but there is no proof of it.
There's no proof of luring anything, anywhere.
you mind trying to explain what you mean by that. It read in the article that they were enticing kids with cash. How is that not luring?
originally posted by: SentientCentenarian
Cash?! What happened to good ol'fashioned candy and balloons?
What's this world coming to?
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: gunshooter
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: butcherguy
There is no proof that the clowns are sinister.
They probably are sinister (they are clowns luring children), but there is no proof of it.
There's no proof of luring anything, anywhere.
you mind trying to explain what you mean by that. It read in the article that they were enticing kids with cash. How is that not luring?
Yeah sure.
There's photos of clowns posing, there's text about clowns enticing kids into the woods,
Photos of clowns and text relating to luring/enticing/abducting children isn't actual proof of anything luring/enticing/abducting children.
Does that make sense?
originally posted by: Atsbhct
Perhaps these kids saw a preview for the new "It" series and imaginations ran wild, as they do.
originally posted by: gunshooter
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: gunshooter
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: butcherguy
There is no proof that the clowns are sinister.
They probably are sinister (they are clowns luring children), but there is no proof of it.
There's no proof of luring anything, anywhere.
you mind trying to explain what you mean by that. It read in the article that they were enticing kids with cash. How is that not luring?
Yeah sure.
There's photos of clowns posing, there's text about clowns enticing kids into the woods,
Photos of clowns and text relating to luring/enticing/abducting children isn't actual proof of anything luring/enticing/abducting children.
Does that make sense?
(According to the deputy, several children from Fleetwood Manor told him several clowns have been appearing in the woods behind one of the buildings and trying to persuade them to enter the woods by waving large amounts of money.)
this is straight from the article, this doesn't sound like a text to me.