It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: tetra50
Thank you. Not enough ppl are talking about it. I know it has been an age long struggle but something happened with the introduction of some of these new long acting medications. Doctors were told this is the answer! The potential for abuse is less and this will help chronic pain people, which they do I know. But how doctors could believe the potential for abuse was low I find hard to believe. Even if it's true they prescribe so widely for every and any condition...this is epidemic proportions now and it's perfect because those involved don't want to publicly talk about it and anyway who would listen to them? Junkies...drug seekers...depression caused from how these drugs alter your brain makes ppl believe they are the lowest of the low. With so many in this position the only answer would be mass rehab and an entire shift to change the way we see addiction. We could do it...we could use funds from new legalized weed sales. Canada says they will. How many will be dead before this happens from this mysterious appeareance of killer heroin? Will it happen? Highly doubtful. It's a sad slope. I'm glad you have found a way to survive the pain for all these years and are OK. Or as you can be. I understand it very well it's a battle and coming back from brain changes after meds is a battle I know too...opiates and things like Lyrica! ! My neurologist said to me we have no idea what Lyrica does to your brain and in combination WITH opiates hahaha. That was a great response. In any case thanks for your reply and hope you stay as well as possible
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: tiredoflooking
Who isn't? The pushers? Of course they're using it on purpose. It's cheap and plentiful. Gives the users an awesome rush. They'll be back, if they survive. If they don't, the pusher don't care.
They certainly aren't using it on purpose so WHERE is it coming from??
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: tiredoflooking
Those "problems" have been around for a long time. "Getting rid" of them would never really be a problem. There are poisons other than opiods which would have been used long ago if that were the solution.
You cannot buy heroin with a prescription. You can only buy it on the street. And it never (never) has been what you were being sold. You may blame doctors for much, but don't blame them for that. That is pushers victimizing addicts.
Chronic pain not caused by cancer is among the most prevalent and debilitating medical conditions but also among the most controversial and complex to manage. The urgency of patients’ needs, the demonstrated effectiveness of opioid analgesics for the management of acute pain, and the limited therapeutic alternatives for chronic pain have combined to produce an overreliance on opioid medications in the United States, with associated alarming increases in diversion, overdose, and addiction. Given the lack of clinical consensus and research-supported guidance, physicians understandably have questions about whether, when, and how to prescribe opioid analgesics for chronic pain without increasing public health risks. Here, we draw on recent research to address common misconceptions regarding the abuse-related risks of opioid analgesics and highlight strategies to minimize those risks.
SOURCE OF THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC
More than 30% of Americans have some form of acute or chronic pain.1,2 Among older adults, the prevalence of chronic pain is more than 40%.2 Given the prevalence of chronic pain and its often disabling effects, it is not surprising that opioid analgesics are now the most commonly prescribed class of medications in the United States.3 In 2014 alone, U.S. retail pharmacies dispensed 245 million prescriptions for opioid pain relievers.4,5 Of these prescriptions, 65% were for short-term therapy (
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: tetra50
I provided a clear definition, with no implications.
Was my definition inaccurate? Would "dealer" have been less offensive?
originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: tetra50
I do get what you are trying to say. I can understand even more than I can express living with chronic pain. I do as well. I guess I skimmed quickly over that subject as it wasn't really what I was writing about. I guess I sort of almost take it for granted as silly as that is...for me it's been since my car accident in 2008. I absolutely believe ppl in pain do not even experience a " high" from these meds as it is eaten by ones pain and is just a part of daily survival. I guess when I say I blame the doctors it might be true that I am actually more a little resentful at their lack of understanding and that is probably , just as you say, because they do not suffer from chronic pain themselves. My focus with this post was sort of more narrowly directed at these current heroin overdoses and how and why they are happening. You are absolutely right that there is a much bigger picture here that desperately needs to be talked about.
originally posted by: tetra50
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: tetra50
I provided a clear definition, with no implications.
Was my definition inaccurate? Would "dealer" have been less offensive?
Actually, I think it was me that provided a very clear definition of both. Yes, "dealer" would be much less offensive.
We currently have an ecomnomy that disenfranchises many. If you were an uneducated, lacking in options, having grown up in poverty, young man who can make $200 to $400 a day dealing, or work at Wendy's, flipping burgers for less than a $100 a day, supporting children, mothers, what would you do and what would you prefer to be called?
Are you actually pushing something on folks that aren't seeking the same, or supplying them with what they demand?
It's actually quite a different thing when viewed through that scope, is it not?
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: tetra50
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: tetra50
I provided a clear definition, with no implications.
Was my definition inaccurate? Would "dealer" have been less offensive?
Actually, I think it was me that provided a very clear definition of both. Yes, "dealer" would be much less offensive.
We currently have an ecomnomy that disenfranchises many. If you were an uneducated, lacking in options, having grown up in poverty, young man who can make $200 to $400 a day dealing, or work at Wendy's, flipping burgers for less than a $100 a day, supporting children, mothers, what would you do and what would you prefer to be called?
Are you actually pushing something on folks that aren't seeking the same, or supplying them with what they demand?
It's actually quite a different thing when viewed through that scope, is it not?
I apologize for jumping in on a conversation, pretty sure anyone who has had a good look at where we are today can see that it is far from fair, so far so that to work at one of the multi nationals corporations in the U.S apparently you are not even payed a living wage.....this goes to show how far we are gone in this failed system.....Phage may be a bit of an enigma, he is NOT devoid of feeling however
You cannot buy heroin with a prescription. You can only buy it on the street. And it never (never) has been what you were being sold. You may blame doctors for much, but don't blame them for that. That is pushers victimizing addicts.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Phage
You cannot buy heroin with a prescription. You can only buy it on the street. And it never (never) has been what you were being sold. You may blame doctors for much, but don't blame them for that. That is pushers victimizing addicts.
Drug addicts blame anyone and everyone as long as it takes away the blame from themselves.....btw i am not writing this for your benefit....
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: tetra50
He needs no explanation .....from my point of view he comes across quite robotic in his thinking,(assuming he or she is male ?)
OK robotic is harsh...linear perhaps ??......blunt even....regardless he is a smart cookie and has some unique insight and no matter how you feel about that, it is much better to listen and learn than to write off....